green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Gerald F. Johnson, United States of America v. Thomas Johnson, United States of America v. Edward T. Wooten
(2×)
But see United States v. Angelini, 565 F.2d 469, 473 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1487 , 55 L.Ed.2d 517 (1978) 59 Weiss & Hecker, The Authentication of Magnetic Tapes: Current Problems and Possible Solutions, in NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE REVIEW OF FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS RELATING TO WIRETAPPING AND ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, COMMISSION STUDIES 216, 237 (1976) 60 Id. at 224; see Lopez v. United States, 373 U.S. 427, 468 , 83 S.Ct. 1381, 1403 , 10 L.Ed.2d 462 (1963) (Brennan, J., dissenting) (electronic surveillance devices "lend themselves to diabolical fakery"); S. DASH…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesus Mejia-Duarte, United States of America v. Francisco Gonzalez
See United States Pierce, 561 F.2d 735 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jonathan D. Korshin v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service
See Frey v. United States, 558 F.2d 270 (5th Cir.1977) (Section 109 allows post-repeal enforcement of tax liability arising under former I.R.C. § 4741 — the marijuana excise tax provision — for pre-repeal taxable marijuana sale), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1487 , 55 L.Ed.2d 517 (1978); see also Hertz, 218 U.S. at 218 , 30 S.Ct. at 624-25 (predecessor of § 109 preserved liability incurred under former federal inheritance tax statute, even though tax statute later repealed). 6 An analysis of the practical effects of Korshin’s position, were it accepted, further supports our re…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Lee Dominguez
See United States v. Moore, 682 F.2d 853, 857 (9th Cir.1982) (the right against self-incrimination does not justify a "blanket refusal to answer any question") (quoting United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735, 741 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 (1978)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James L. Pratt, Jr.
See United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735, 741 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978); North River Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James William Giannetta
See United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735, 739 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978); United States v. Smith, 395 F.Supp. 1155, 1156-57 (W.D.N.Y.1975). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ojeda Rios
See United States v. Angelini, 565 F.2d 469, 471 (7th Cir.1977) (if there is no satisfactory explanation for a sealing delay, court should consider whether statutory purpose of preserving tapes’ integrity was satisfied, whether sealing requirement was deliberately ignored, and, if so, whether any tactical advantage was gained), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1487 , 55 L.Ed.2d 517 (1978); McMillan v. United States, 558 F.2d 877, 879 (8th Cir.1977) (per curiam) (denying habeas relief for federal prisoner, who alleged that sealing requirement had been violated, because integrity of tapes…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ojeda Rios
See United States v. Angelini, 565 F.2d 469, 471 (7th Cir.1977) (if there is no satisfactory explanation for a sealing delay, court should consider whether statutory purpose of preserving tapes' integrity was satisfied, whether sealing requirement was deliberately ignored, and, if so, whether any tactical advantage was gained), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1487 , 55 L.Ed.2d 517 (1978); McMillan v. United States, 558 F.2d 877, 879 (8th Cir.1977) (per curiam) (denying habeas relief for federal prisoner, who alleged that sealing requirement had been violated, because integrity of tapes w…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hector Mora, United States of America v. Franklin Valencia, United States of America v. Jose Alberto Valencia, United States of America v. Luis Fernando Berrio
(2×)
See United States v. Angelini, 565 F.2d 469, 471-72 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1487 , 55 L.Ed.2d 517 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mora
(2×)
See United States v. Angelini, 565 F.2d 469, 471-72 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1487 , 55 L.Ed.2d 517 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Morrell & Company v. Local Union 304a
See National Rejectors Indus. v. United Steelworkers, 562 F.2d 1069, 1075 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 517 (1978), (citing Buffalo Forge, 428 U.S. at 409 , 96 S.Ct. at 3148 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Morrell & Co. v. Local Union 304A of United Food & Commercial Workers
See National Rejectors Indus, v. United Steelworkers, 562 F.2d 1069, 1075 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 517 (1978), (citing Buffalo Forge, 428 U.S. at 409 , 96 S.Ct. at 3148 ).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Steven Miller and Jesus Salvador Zambrano-Mares
See United States v. Graves, 556 F.2d 1319, 1325 (5th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1485 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kim Allen Stanley, John R. Spiczak, Evan N. Leake, Edward Lee Shorr, Russell Greenway, Stanley Dimich, and Clement James Dematto
See United States v. Graves, 556 F.2d 1319 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1485 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wright Contracting Co.
See United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735, 739 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978); United States v. Smith, 414 F.2d 630, 636 (5th Cir.1969), rev’d on other grounds sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Nieves
Accord, United States v. Angelini (7th Cir. 1977), 565 F.2d 469, 471 , cert. denied (1978), 435 U.S. 923 , 55 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mitsubishi International Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad, and Burlington Northern, Inc.
See United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735, 739 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978); United States v. Smith, 414 F.2d 630, 636 (5th Cir. 1969), rev’d on other grounds sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Aaron \Bud\" McCaghren United States of America v. Glen Edward Autry
See United States v. Graves, 556 F.2d 1319 , 1324 & n.7 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1485 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Reaemco, Inc. v. Allegheny Airlines
See REA Express, Inc. v. United States, 568 F.2d 940 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1485 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ralph R. Ross
See also United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735, 742 (9th Cir.1977) (noting that a defendant who asserted his Fifth Amendment right to silence in refusing to answer questions regarding his finances that related to condition of his probation "failed to show that the conditions infringed upon his constitutional rights [and failed to] ... provide[ ] any other justification for his refusal to comply with the condition of probation”), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward O. Messer, Jr.
See also United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735, 738 (9th Cir.1977) (voluntary guilty plea does not waive the right against self-incrimination for all prior activities of the defendant), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William Dale Yater
See also United States v. Graves, 556 F.2d 1319 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1485 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978): " ‘A claim of entrapment on the basis of outrageous government involvement does not present any question for a jury to decide but solely a question of law for the court.’ ” 556 F.2d at 1322 (quoting United States v. Quinn, 543 F.2d 640, 647-48 (8th Cir.1976) (emphasis and citations omitted)). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jeffrey L. Green
See United States v. Merritt, 639 F.2d 254, 256 (5th Cir.1981); United States v. McDonough, 603 F.2d 19, 24 (7th Cir.1979); see also United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735 , 743 n. 3 (9th Cir.1977) (Hufstedler, J., dissenting), ce rt. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Barbara Rodriguez
See also United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735, 738 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978); United States v. Wilcox, 450 F.2d 1131 , 1142 n. 12 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 917 , 92 S.Ct. 941 , 30 L.Ed.2d 787 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Timothy Walter Stine
See also United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735, 739 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978) (“reasonably related” test applies to conditions infringing on constitutional rights); United States v. Tonry, 605 F.2d 144, 150 (5th Cir. 1979) (“probation condition is not necessarily invalid simply because it affects a probationer’s ability to exercise constitutionally protected rights”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William Higdon v. United States
See also United States v. Pierce, 561 F.2d 735, 739 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1486 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978) (explaining and applying Consuelo-Gonzalez).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Board of Education of City School District of City of New York v. Harris
See also REA Express, Inc. v. United States, 568 F.2d 940 , 948-49 n.10 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1485 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978) ("highly dubious" that government agency can be equitably estopped).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Board of Education of City School District of City of New York v. Harris
See also REA Express, Inc. v. United States, 568 F.2d 940 , 948 — 49 n.10 (2d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1485 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 (1978) (“highly dubious” that government agency can be equitably estopped).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oscar McInnis and Patricia Parada
See, e.g., United States v. Graves, 5 Cir. 1977, 556 F.2d 1319 , cert. denied, 1978, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1485 , 55 L.Ed.2d 516 ; United States v. McCord, 1974, 166 U.S.App.D.C. 1, 15-17 , 509 F.2d 334, 348-51 , cert. denied, 1975, 421 U.S. 930 , 95 S.Ct. 1656 , 44 L.Ed.2d 87 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antonio Cruz Vazquez, Benito Luis Cortina, Antonio Gonzalez, Andres Rene Rappard, and Jose De La Fe-Quintas
See also United States v. Angelini, 565 F.2d 469 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1487 , 55 L.Ed.2d 517 (1978) (9-day, 26-day and 38-day delays excused); United States v. Sklaroff, supra, 506 F.2d 837 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cerbo v. Fauver
See, e. g., United States v. Angelini, 565 F.2d 469 (7th Cir. 1977), cert, denied 435 U.S. 923 , 98 S.Ct. 1487 , 55 L.Ed.2d 517 (1978); United States v. Sklaroff, 506 F.2d 837 (5th Cir. 1975), cert, denied 423 U.S. 874 , 96 S.Ct. 142 , 46 L.Ed.2d 105 (1975). 3 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Graves
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-846.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 1978.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.