green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Bennett
courts should avoid adopting an overly restrictive interpretation of the minimization requirement which makes it impossible to use this device in connection with the investigation of organized criminal conspiracies.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arevalo
See United States v. Cox, 567 F.2d 930, 933 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 , 98 S.Ct. 1496 , 55 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978) (an overly restrictive interpretation of the minimization requirement could make it impossible to use this device in connection with the investigation of organized criminal conspiracies).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy Conrad Rehak
See United States v. Speir, 564 F.2d 934, 938 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 (1978); United States v. Jermendy, 544 F.2d 640, 641 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 909 (1976); United States v. Crutchley, 502 F.2d 1195, 1201 (3d Cir. 1974); Denmon, 483 F.2d at 1095 ; United States v. Smith, 489 F.2d 1330, 1333-34 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 994 (1973); United States v. Boyd, 446 F.2d 1267, 1274 (5th Cir. 1971); United States v. Howey, 427 F.2d 1017, 1018 (9th Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rehak
(2×)
See United States v. Speir, 564 F.2d 934, 938 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 , 98 S.Ct. 1495 , 55 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978); United States v. Jermendy, 544 F.2d 640, 641 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 1181 , 51 L.Ed.2d 585 (1977); United States v. Crutchley, 502 F.2d 1195, 1201 (3d Cir.1974); Denmon, 483 F.2d at 1095 ; United States v. Smith, 489 F.2d 1330, 1333-34 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 994 , 94 S.Ct. 2407 , 40 L.Ed.2d 773 (1974); United States v. Boyd, 446 F.2d 1267, 1274 (5th Cir.1971); United States v. Howey, 427 F.2d 1017, 1018 (9th Cir.1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Castillo-Garcia
See United States v. Cox, 567 F.2d 930, 933 (10th Cir.1977) (“Courts should avoid adopting an overly restrictive interpretation of the minimization requirement which makes it impossible to use this device in connection with the investigation of organized criminal conspiracies.”), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 , 98 S.Ct. 1496 , 55 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Duran
See United States v. Masel, 563 F.2d 322, 324 (7th Cir.1977) (concluding that state definition of “assault” did not control the meaning of that term as used in 18 U.S.C. § 351 , the analogue of 18 U.S.C. § 1751 for Members of Congress, the Cabinet, Presidential and Vice-Presidential candidates, and Justices of the United States), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 , 98 S.Ct. 1496 , 55 L.Ed.2d 523 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert D. Scott
See United States v. Cox, 567 F.2d 930, 932 (10th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jackie Dee Willis
See United States v. Cox, 567 F.2d 930, 933 (10th Cir. *1103 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 , 98 S.Ct. 1496 , 55 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978) (an overly restrictive interpretation of the minimization requirement could make it impossible to use this device in connection with the investigation of organized criminal conspiracies).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shirley NULF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL PAPER CO., a New York Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See United States v. Speir, 564 F.2d 934, 938 (10th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 , 98 S.Ct. 1495 , 55 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978); United States v. Walton, 552 F.2d 1354, 1364 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 959 , 97 S.Ct. 2685 , 53 L.Ed.2d 277 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Murrell v. People
See State v. Gaymon, 96 Conn. App. 244 , 899 A.2d 715, 720 (2006) (spitting on officer constitutes a true threat sufficient to sustain conviction for breach of the peace); see also United States v. Masel, 563 F.2d 322, 323 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 , 98 S. Ct. 1496 , 55 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph
See United States v. Redding, 14 USCMA at 244-45 , 34 CMR at 24-25 ; see also United States v. Masel, 563 F.2d 322 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 , 98 S.Ct. 1496 , 55 L.Ed.2d 523 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rasco
See, e.g., United States v. Emler, 570 F.2d 584 (6th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 , 98 S.Ct. 1496 , 55 *346 L.Ed.2d 523 (1978) (holding that an indictment need not allege “unlawful or fraudulent intent” if it identifies § 2314 and charges the accused with transporting a bank check known to be forged or falsely made).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Silverman
(2×)
See also United States v. Dixon, 562 F.2d 1138, 1141 (9th Cir.1977) ("the substantiality of the independent evidence ... need only be slight"), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 927 , 98 S.Ct. 1494 , 55 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Shannon
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-5892.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 20, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: D. Colorado (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.