green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph H. Fleischli
See United States v. Markley, 567 F.2d 523, 527-28 (1st Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978); United States v. Ross, 458 F.2d 1144, 1145 (5th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 868 , 93 S.Ct. 167 , 34 L.Ed.2d 118 (1972); United States v. Morningstar, 456 F.2d 278, 281 (4th Cir.1972), ce rt. denied, 409 U.S. 896 , 93 S.Ct. 135 , 34 L.Ed.2d 153 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Fleischli, Joseph
See United States v. Markley, 567 F.2d 523, 527-28 (1st Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 (1978); United States v. Ross, 458 F.2d 1144, 1145 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 868 (1972); United States v. Morningstar, 456 F.2d 278, 281 (4th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 896 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Waters v. International Precious Metals Corp.
See Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., 559 F.2d 1357, 1361 (8th Cir.1977), cert. den. 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978) (court recognized that loss causation was not based on the price at which the plaintiff bought but that he was induced to buy at all); see also Clayton, 794 F.2d 573 (where plaintiff initiated the trades in his commodities account with defendants, court found that defendants were nevertheless liable because plaintiffs continued participation in trading was induced by misrepresentations by the defendants about the risk of loss therefrom); Rinfret, Inc.…
discussed
Cited "see"
Trimed, Inc. v. Sherwood Medical Co.
See Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., 559 F.2d 1357, 1362 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978) (jury’s failure to follow the trial court’s erroneous instruction is not sufficient ground for a new trial if it is otherwise clear that the verdict is just), citing Lazier Gas Engine Co. v. Du Bois, 130 F. 834 (3rd Cir.1904) (“where the court is convinced and is able to demonstrate that the verdict on the whole was a just one, and that certain instructions as to the measure of damages given by the court to the jury, and apparently disregarded by …
cited
Cited "see"
Gould v. Department of Health & Human Services
See West, 592 F.2d at 492-93 , quoting Hulver v. United States, 562 F.2d 1132, 1134 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1576 , 55 L.Ed.2d 800 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Gould ex rel. Gould v. U.S. Deparment of Health & Human Services
See West, 592 F.2d at 492-93 , quoting Hulver v. United States, 562 F.2d 1132, 1134 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1576 , 55 L.Ed.2d 800 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Gould ex rel. Gould v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
See West, 592 F.2d at 492-93 , quoting Hulver v. United States, 562 F.2d 1132, 1134 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1576 , 55 L.Ed.2d 800 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Gould v. Department of Health & Human Services
See West, 592 F.2d at 492-93 , quoting Hulver v. United States, 562 F.2d 1132, 1134 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1576 , 55 L.Ed.2d 800 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
James K. Campbell, Cross-Appellants v. Shearson/american Express Inc., and J. Gary Morgan, Cross-Appellees
See Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., 559 F.2d 1357, 1360-1361 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 (1978); Chasins v. Smith, Barney & Co., 438 F.2d 1167, 1173 (2nd Cir. 1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terry James and Juha Kokko v. Raymond H. Meinke
See Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., 559 F.2d 1357, 1360-61 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978); Foster v. Financial Technology Inc., 517 F.2d 1068, 1071 (9th Cir.1975); Madigan, Inc. v. Goodman, 498 F.2d 233, 238-39 (7th Cir.1974); Zeller v. Bogue Electric Manufacturing Corp., 476 F.2d 795, 801-03 (2d Cir.1973); deHaas v. Empire Petroleum Co., 435 F.2d 1223, 1228-29 (10th Cir.1970); Bowman & Bourdon, Inc. v. Rohr, 296 F.Supp. 847, 852 , (D.Mass.), aff'd, 417 F.2d 780 (1st Cir.1969).
cited
Cited "see"
LIPIN ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED v. Lee
See U.S. v. Nerone, 563 F.2d 836 , 852, cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1577 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ira Blackwood
See United States v. Nerone, 563 F.2d 836, 852 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Marrapese v. The State of Rhode Island
(2×)
Portis, 483 F.2d at 672 ; accord Hulver v. United States, 562 F.2d 1132, 1137 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1576 , 55 L.Ed.2d 800 (1978); Toal v. United States, 438 F.2d 222 (2d Cir.1971); Girard v. United States, 455 F.Supp. 502 (D.N.H.1978). .
cited
Cited "see"
Boeck v. Logan 480 Dairy Farm
See Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., 559 F.2d 1357 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Willard Crimm v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation
“Where the instructions, considered as a whole, adequately and sufficiently state the generally applicable law, the fact that the instructions are technically imperfect or are not a model of clarity does not render the charge erroneous.” Tribble v. Westinghouse, 669 F.2d at 1197 ; see Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicholaus & Co., 559 F.2d 1357, 1362 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Snyder v. United States
See, Hulver v. United States, 562 F.2d 1132 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1576 , 55 L.Ed.2d 800 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harry O. Stratton, William D. Riggs and Loy Z. Harrell, United States of America v. Samuel S. Smith
United States v. Rone, 598 F.2d 564, 573 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 946 , 100 S.Ct. 1345 , 63 L.Ed.2d 780 (1980); accord, United States v. Nerone, 563 F.2d 836, 850-51 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1577 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978); Vignola, supra, 464 F.Supp. at 1097 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Engl Ex Rel. Plymouth Plaza Associates v. Berg
See United States v. Nerone, 563 F.2d 836 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1577 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978) (insufficient nexus between gambling operation on property of and conducted by principals of mobile home park and affairs of that enterprise, rental of mobile home space and hook ups); United States v. Ladmer, 429 F.Supp. 1231 (E.D.N.Y.1977) (conversion of union funds for personal use does not constitute conduct of union affairs through racketeering activity); United States v. Dennis, 458 F.Supp. 197 (E.D.Mo.1978) (collection of unlawful debts on property of General Mot…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Boffa
See United States v. Nerone, *463 563 F.2d 836 , 851 (C.A.7,1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1577 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978); United States v. Gibson, 486 F.Supp. 1230, 1244 (S.D.Ohio 1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,613 George F. Nye, Gerald J. Sterner, and Thomas E. Mulcahy, Individually and as a Joint Venture Doing Business in the Name of Gerald J. Sterner, Cross-Appellants v. Blyth Eastman Dillon & Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Richard Newham, and Harold Covlin, Cross-Appellees. George F. Nye, Gerald J. Sterner, Thomas E. Mulcahy, Individually and as a Joint Venture Doing Business in the Name of Gerald J. Sterner v. Richard Newham, George F. Nye, Gerald J. Sterner, Thomas E. Mulcahy, Individually and as a Joint Venture Doing Business in the Name of Gerald J. Sterner v. Blyth Eastman Dillon and Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Harold Covlin
See n.7, Supra. 45 It is true that in fashioning an appropriate damage measure in a Rule 10b-5 action, "(the Court's) function is to fashion the remedy best suited to the harm." Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., 559 F.2d 1357, 1360 (8th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nye v. Blyth Eastman Dillon & Co.
See n.7, supra. It is true that in fashioning an appropriate damage measure in a Rule 10b-5 action, “[the Court’s] function is to fashion the remedy best suited to the harm.” Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., 559 F.2d 1357, 1360 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry J. Copus
United States v. Momingstar, 456 F.2d 278 , 280 (4th Cir.) (stating in dictum that devices identified in § 5845(f)(1) “are covered regardless of their intended use”), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 896 , 93 S.Ct. 135 , 34 L.Ed.2d 153 (1972); see also United States v. Markley, 567 F.2d 523, 527 (1st Cir.1977) (concluding that there was sufficient evidence to support a jury finding *273 that the home-made incendiary devices fell within the provisions of § 5845(f)(1) “regardless of their intended purpose”), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,912 in Re Letterman Brothers Energy Securities Litigation. Donald A. Drake v. Letterman Transaction Services, Letterman Brothers Energy Program v. Banctexas Dallas, N.A., Richard J. Stuart v. Letterman Brothers Energy, Defendants-Third Party v. Banctexas Dallas, N.A., Third Party
See Huddleston, 640 F.2d at 554 ; see also Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., 559 F.2d 1357, 1360 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978). 23 A bank, unless it is acting as a broker or in a situation closely analogous to that of a broker, is not within the category of parties against whom recissional damages may be awarded.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Drake v. Letterman Transaction Services
See Huddleston, 640 F.2d at 554 ; see also Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., 559 F.2d 1357, 1360 (8th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryville Academy v. Loeb Rhoades & Co., Inc.
See, e.g., Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., 559 F.2d 1357, 1360 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978) (defendant liable for such damages as naturally and proximately result from the fraud); Globus v. Law Research Service, Inc., 418 F.2d 1276, 1291 (2d Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 913 , 90 S.Ct. 913 , 25 L.Ed.2d 93 (1970) (damages must be a proximate result of misleading statements); Franklin Life Instrument Co. v. Commonwealth Edison Co., 451 F.Supp. 602, 607-08 (S.D.Ill.1978) aff’d, 598 F.2d 1109 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 900 , …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Bolton Arrington
See also United States v. Vice, 562 F.2d 1004 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978) (citing Fryer with implicit approval).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,895 Margaret Morris v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., and Kingsley O. Wright, Sr., Mary A. Braun v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Kingsley O. Wright, and Theodore Menas
See also Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., 559 F.2d 1357, 1363 (8th Cir. 1977), Cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Morris v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co.
See also Garnatz v. Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., 559 F.2d 1357, 1363 (8th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 951 , 98 S.Ct. 1578 , 55 L.Ed.2d 801 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Nicolas Nogueras, Jr.
v.
Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc.
v.
Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc.
77-1034.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 3, 1978.
435 U.S. 951
Published
Nicolas NOGUERAS, Jr., et al., petitioners,
v.
PUERTO RICO INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES, INC., et al
No. 77-1034
Supreme Court of the United States
April 3, 1978
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
1
Denied.