green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
“defendant's right to testify in a criminal proceeding against him so basic to a fair trial that its infraction can never be treated as a harmless error.”
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Jordan v. Hargett
But see Wright v. Estelle, 572 F.2d 1071, 1080-82 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (Godbold, J., dissenting) (suggesting that denial of defendant's right to testify should be reversible per se), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 617 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978).
discussed
Cited "but see"
People v. Curtis
But see Wright v. Estelle, 572 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.) (Godbold, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 617 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978) (dissenting judge argues right to testify is fundamental).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jeffrey Frey v. Timothy Schuetzle
defendant's right to testify in a criminal proceeding against him so basic to a fair trial that its infraction can never be treated as a harmless error.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hampton
See Wright v. Estelle, 572 F.2d 1071, 1073 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 617 (1978) (Thornberry, Clark, Roney, Gee, Hill, J.J., specially concurring).
cited
Cited "see"
Porter v. Singletary
See Wright v. Estelle, 549 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 617 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978) (court found error was harmless because the evidence was overwhelming).
discussed
Cited "see"
LaVigne v. State
See Wright v. Estelle, 549 F.2d 971 (5th Cir.1977), aff'd, 572 F.2d 1071 (5th Cir.1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 617 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978); United States v. Teague, 908 F.2d 752 (11th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lindberg Corp.
See Fitzgerald v. Staats, 429 F.Supp. 933 (D.D.C. 1977), aff'd. 578 F.2d 435 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 616 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978) (two claims under $10,-000 with aggregate over $10,000 allowed where claims were distinct).
discussed
Cited "see"
A. C. Davenport & Son Co. v. United States
See Fitzgerald v. Staats, 429 F.Supp. 933, 935 (D.D.C.), aff’d, 578 F.2d 435 (D.C.Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 616 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978), where the court stated that the fact that a party has two or more claims for $10,000 or less, but aggregating more than $10,000, does not deprive the district court of jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bret v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
See Cooper v. Bell, 628 F.2d 1208, 1213 (9th Cir. 1980), Kirk v. Rockwell International Corporation, 578 F.2d 814 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 616 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978); Mahroom v. Hook, 563 F.2d 1369 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied 436 U.S. 904 , 98 S.Ct. 2234 , 56 L.Ed.2d 402 (1978); Davis v. Valley Distributing Co., 522 F.2d 827 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 429 U.S. 1090 , 97 S.Ct. 1099 , 51 L.Ed.2d 535 (1977); and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wah Chang Albany Corp., 499 F.2d 187, 190 (9th Cir. 1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Theodore S. Cooper v. Griffin B. Bell
See Kirk v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 578 F.2d 814, 823 (9th Cir.) (Hufstedler, J., concurring), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 616 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuel CONERLY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
See Kirk v. Rockwell International Corp., 578 F.2d 814 , 820 n. 19 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 616 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978); Griffin v. Pacific Maritime Ass’n, 478 F.2d 1118, 1119 (9th Cir. 1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William T. Panza, United States of America v. John Tates
(2×)
See generally Wright v. Estelle, 572 F.2d 1071, 1084 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (Godbold, J., dissenting), Cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 617 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978); United States v. Bentvena, 319 F.2d 916, 942-44 (2d Cir.), Cert. denied, 375 U.S. 940 , 84 S.Ct. 345 , 11 L.Ed.2d 271 (1963).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Beshears v. State
See also, Drennon v. State, 581 P.2d 901, 903 (Okl.Cr.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 617 , 58 L.Ed.2d 681 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Emmanuel Charles Whiteside v. David Scurr, Warden
Wilcox v. Johnson, 555 F.2d at 118-19 ; see also Wright v. Estelle, 572 F.2d 1071, 1075-76 (5th Cir.) (Godbold, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 617 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Levon Brown A/K/A Robert Dennis v. United States
See also Wright v. Estelle, 572 F.2d 1071, 1074-84 (5th Cir.) (banc) (Godbold, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 617 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph Marino v. United States
Compare Wright v. Estelle, 5 Cir. 1977, 549 F.2d 971 , aff’d en banc, 1978, 572 F.2d 1071 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 617 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rosillo
See, e.g., Wright v. Estelle, 572 F.2d 1071 (5 Cir.), certiorari denied, 439 U.S. 1004 , 99 S.Ct. 617 , 58 L.Ed.2d 680 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hutter
v.
Lake View Trust & Savings Bank
v.
Lake View Trust & Savings Bank
No. 78-628.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 4, 1978.
439 U.S. 1004
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (1)
App. Ct. Ill., 1st Dist. Certiorari denied.