green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Knotts v. State
he aggravating and mitigating circumstances contained in alabama's new death penalty act are identical to those in the florida act
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Wellmaker v. Dahill
unitive isolation 'is not necessarily unconstitutional....' it is perfectly obvious that every decision to remove a particular inmate from the general prison population for an indeterminate period could not be characterized as cruel and unusual.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Casey
Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. at 143-144, n. 12 , 99 S.Ct. at 430-431, n. 12, 58 L.Ed.2d at 401, n. 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Sutton v. Evans
See Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 693-95 , 98 S.Ct. 2565, 2575-76 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978), reh’g denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979); Quern, 440 U.S. at 344-45 , 99 S.Ct. at 1147 .
cited
Cited "see"
Clemes v. Del Norte County Unified School District
See Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978), reh’g denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979). 19 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lewis
See generally Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 140-50 , 99 S.Ct. 421, 428-34 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), reh. denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979); United States v. Cruz Jimenez, 894 F.2d 1, 5 (1st Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Saldana v. State
(2×)
See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), reh'g denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979); United States v. Waupekenay, 973 F.2d 1533 (10th Cir. 1992).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Doe
See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 140-49 , 99 S.Ct. 421, 428-33 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), reh’g denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dotson v. Chester
See Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 694-700 , 98 S.Ct. 2565, 2575-78 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978), reh'g denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979); McManama v. Lukhard, 464 F.Supp. 38, 42 (W.D.Va.1978), aff'd, 616 F.2d 727 (4th Cir.1980) 12 Prior to the establishment of the Commission, the statute governing the "jail programming and inspection officer" who inspected jails for compliance with State standards, stated that the "officer will submit a report to the county commission of the several counties ... showing the results of such inspection together with recommendations...." 19…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation
See Finney v. Hutto, 548 F.2d 740 (8th Cir.1977) aff'd 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978) reh’g denied 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979); Kerr v. Screen Extras Guild, Inc., 526 F.2d 67 (9th Cir.1975), ce rt. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1726 , 48 L.Ed.2d 195 (1976); Evans v. Sheraton Park Hotel, 503 F.2d 177 (D.C.Cir.1974). 46 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Dotson v. Chester
See Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 694-700 , 98 S.Ct. 2565, 2575-78 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978), reh’g denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979); McManama v. Lukhard, 464 F.Supp. 38, 42 (W.D.Va.1978), aff’d, 616 F.2d 727 (4th Cir.1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Eugene Harrison, United States of America v. Gary Don Jeter
See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), reh’g denied 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979); United States v. Johnston, 685 F.2d 934, 939 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1053 , 103 S.Ct. 1501 , 75 L.Ed.2d 932 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Raymond Roger Jones v. Ron England Paul Stout
See Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 685 (1978) rehearing denied 439 U.S. 1122 (1979); Walker v. Mintzes, 771 F.2d 920, 925-26 (6th Cir.1985); Chapman v. City of Detroit, 808 F.2d 459, 465 (6th Cir.1987); Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 104 (1976). 7 Accordingly, the district courts' order of dismissal is hereby affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. * The Honorable Ann Aldrich, District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation
cited
Cited "see"
Gregg v. Township Committee
See Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 693-700 , 98 S.Ct. 2565, 2574-2578 , 57 L.Ed. 2d 522 (1978), reh'g den. 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 *39 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Mollica
(2×)
See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), reh. den., 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
McAdams v. Salem Children's Home
See Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978), reh’g denied 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979) and Greenholtz v. Nebraska Penal Inmates, 442 U.S. 1, 18 , 99 S.Ct. 2100, 2109 , 60 L.Ed.2d 668 (1979). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Flittie
(2×)
See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), reh'g denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Hays
See Jacobs v. State, 361 So.2d 640 (Ala. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1034 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 , (1979); Beck v. State, 365 So.2d 985, 1005 (Ala.Crim.App.), aff'd, 365 So.2d 1006 (Ala.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 447 U.S. 625 , 100 S.Ct. 2382 , 65 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980); Evans v. State, 361 So.2d 654, 662 (Ala.Crim.App.1977), aff'd, 361 So.2d 666 (Ala.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 930 , 99 S.Ct. 1267 , 59 L.Ed.2d 486 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Billy Woodard v. Willis Sargent, Warden, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction
See Woodard v. State, 261 Ark. 895 , 553 S.W.2d 259 (1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1034 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Superior Court Order Dated April 8, 1983
See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 (1978), reh’g denied, 439 U.S. 1122 (1979). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Tompkins v. State
(2×)
See Simmons v. United States, supra, 390 U.S., at 389 , 88 S.Ct., at 973 . * * *" (Footnote omitted.) Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 134 , 99 S.Ct. 421, 425 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), reh. denied 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Epperson
See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 , 99 S.Ct. 421 (1978), reh. denied 439 U.S. 1122 (1979), and Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 389-90 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 , 88 S.Ct. 967 (1968).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Muessig
See Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 685-686 , 98 S.Ct. 2565, 2570-2571 , 57 L.Ed. 2d 522 (1978), rehear. den. 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ford
See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 140 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 387 (1978), reh. denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1979); Jones v. United States, 362 U.S. 257, 267 , 80 S.Ct. 725 , 4 L.Ed. 2d 697 (1960).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Mahler
See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 132 n. 2, 99 S.Ct. 421, 424, n. 2 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 387 (1978), reh. den. 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed. 2d 83 (1979) in which the court noted that Thus, a person whose Fourth Amendment rights were violated by a search or seizure, but who is not a defendant in a criminal action in which the illegally seized evidence is sought to be introduced, would not have standing to invoke the exclusionary rule to prevent use of that evidence in that action.
discussed
Cited "see"
Tichnell v. State
(2×)
See Jacobs v. State, 361 So.2d 640, 644-45 (Ala. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1034 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979); Ross v. State, 233 Ga. 361 , 211 S.E.2d 356, 360 (1974); Deutscher v. State, 601 P.2d *742 407, 419 (Nev. 1979); Bell v. State, Miss., 360 So.2d 1206, 1214 (1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 950 , 99 S.Ct. 1433 , 59 L.Ed.2d 640 (1979); Smith v. Com., 219 Va. 455 , 248 S.E.2d 135, 151 (1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 967 , 99 S.Ct. 2419 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Robson v. State
See Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), reh. den. 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Tomlin v. State
See also Jacobs v. State, 361 So.2d 607, 628-34 (Ala.Cr.App.1977), aff'd 361 So.2d 640 (Ala.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1034 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979)." 534 So.2d at 645.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Triangle Leasing Co., Inc. v. McMahon
See, e.g., Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 687 , 98 S.Ct. 2565, 2571-72 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522, 532 (1978), reh'g denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979) (where the Court stated that in fashioning a broad injunctive remedy, the lower court "had ample authority ... to address each element contributing to the violation... [and] was justified in entering a comprehensive order to insure against the risk of inadequate compliance" (emphasis added)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Crozier v. Shillinger
See, e.g., Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678 , 98 S.Ct. 2565 , 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978), reh’g denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979); Williams v. Lane, 851 F.2d 867 (7th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 879 , 102 L.Ed.2d 1001 (1989); Vosburg v. Solem, 845 F.2d 763 (8th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 313 , 102 L.Ed.2d 332 (1988); Davenport v. DeRobertis, 844 F.2d 1310 (7th Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988); Cortes-Quinones v. Jimenez-Nettleship, 842 F.2d 556 (1st Cir.1988), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Armstrong v. State
Compare Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 99 S.Ct. 421 , 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), reh’g denied 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979); Butler v. State, 46 Md.App. 317 , 416 A.2d 773 (1980), cert. dismissed; Griffin v. State, 604 S.W.2d 40 (Tenn.1980); Koonce v. State, 269 Ark. 96 , 598 S.W.2d 741 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Daniels v. State
See also Jacobs v. State , 361 So.2d 607 , 628-34 (Ala.Cr.App. 1977), aff'd 361 So.2d 640 (Ala. 1978), cert denied , 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1034 , 59 L.Ed.2d 83 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Teltser
See also Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 387 , 99 S.Ct. 421 (1978), rehearing denied, 439 U.S. 1122 , 59 L.Ed. 2d 83 , 99 S.Ct. 1035 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
LaSALLE NATIONAL BANK v. ROSEWELL
See also Fulton Market Cold Storage Co. v. Cullerton, 582 F.2d 1071, 1074-75 (7th Cir. 1978) Cert. den. 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1033 , 59 L.Ed.2d 82 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
LaSalle National Bank v. Rosewell
See also Fulton Market Cold Storage Co. v. Cullerton, 582 F.2d 1071, 1074-75 (7th Cir. 1978) cert. den. 439 U.S. 1122 , 99 S.Ct. 1033 , 59 L.Ed.2d 82 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jacobs
v.
Alabama Woodard v. Arkansas
v.
Alabama Woodard v. Arkansas
No. 78-5696; No. 78-5759.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 15, 1979.
439 U.S. 1122
Brennan, Marshall.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Criminal Appeals of A… (1) · N.D. Ohio (1)
Lead Opinion
Sup. Ct. Ala.; and
Sup. Ct. Ark. Cer-tiorari denied. Reported below: No. 78-5696, 361 So. 2d 640; No. 78-5759, 261 Ark. 895, 553 S. W. 2d 259.
Dissent
Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentences in these cases.