green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Daniel Moses LONGORIA, Sr., Defendant-Appellant
the judge made no effort to explain the law of conspiracy generally or by reference to the specific charge of this case, nor did he personally inquire and determine that the defendant understood the nature of the charges.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Ray Shivar
See United States v. Wetterlin, 583 F.2d 346, 352 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Israel Salva
See United States v. Frazier, 705 F.2d 903, 907 (7th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (citing United States v. Wetterlin, 583 F.2d 346, 354 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Israel Salva
See United States v. Frazier, 705 F.2d 903, 907 (7th Cir.1983) (per curiam) (citing United States v. Wetterlin, 583 F.2d 346, 354 (7th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979)).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Marrero
See United States v. Wetterlin, 583 F.2d 346, 354 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); United States v. Kehoe, 562 F.2d 65, 69 (1st Cir.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Suisala v. Tu'ufuli
See. e.g., United States v. Welterlin, 583 F.2d 346 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 ; Knight v. United Notes, 611 F.2d 918 (1st Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Latroy D. Ray, Johnny Lee May, and Boyd McChristion
Nonetheless, in a case alleging a district court’s failure to advise a defendant of one or more rights, “the test on appeal is whether, looking at the total circumstances surrounding the plea, the defendant was informed of his or her rights.” 12 Id.; see United States v. Wetterlin, 583 F.2d 346, 354 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Farmilant v. Singapore Airlines, Ltd.
See Walker v. Hoffman, 583 F.2d 1073, 1075 (9th Cir.1978) (quoting Donnelly v. Guion, 467 F.2d 290, 293 (2d Cir.1972)), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James Gibson Tucker, Jr.
See United States v. Dawson, 576 F.2d 656, 659 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1043 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles L. Rodgers, Anthony J. Bertucci Construction Co., Inc., Mack A. Mathis, Alois Luhr and Luhr Bros., Inc.
See United States v. Fuel, 583 F.2d 978, 981 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dudley Bell
See United States v. Wetterlin, 583 F.2d 346, 354 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); United States v. Kehoe, 562 F.2d 65, 69 (1st Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thordarson
See United States v. Bane, 583 F.2d 832 (6th Cir. 1978) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979), where the court stated that in a § 501(c) case in which the expenditure of union funds was authorized, the government must prove a fraudulent intent to deprive the union of its funds and a bad faith belief that the expenditure was for the legitimate benefit of the union.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Fluhr
(2×)
See United States v. Wetterlin, 583 F.2d 346, 352-53 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); Irizarry v. United States, 508 F.2d 960 , 967 & n.7 (2d Cir. 1975); United States v. Zampitella, 416 F.Supp. 604, 605 (E.D.Pa.1976); 8 Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 11.03[3], at 11-73 to 74 (2d ed. 1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas Hugh Wilkinson and Broadus Vanlandingham Stewart
See generally, United States v. Dawson, 576 F.2d 656, 658 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1043 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); United States v. Herndon, 536 F.2d 1027, 1030 (5th Cir. 1976); Leonard v. United States, 386 F.2d 423, 425 (5th Cir. 1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William A. Floyd
United States v. Dixon, 609 F.2d 827, 829 (5th Cir.1980); see also United States v. Bane, 583 F.2d 832, 835-36 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979); United States v. Gibson, 675 F.2d 825, 828 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 972 , 103 S.Ct. 305 , 74 L.Ed.2d 285 (1982). 4 On the other hand, if the union did not authorize the appropriation, the government need only prove lack of authorization and the defendant’s fraudulent intent.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scott A. Fountain, United States of America v. Matthew D. Granger
(2×)
See also United States v. Wetterlin, 583 F.2d 346 , 352 n. 9 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1979). 40 In directly reviewing a question under Rule 11(f), or Rule 11 in general, any noncompliance is reversible error.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chapman
See, e. g., United States v. Fuel, 583 F.2d 978, 988 (8th Cir.) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S.Ct. 1044 , 59 L.Ed.2d 88 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Priet v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Wetterlin, 583 F.2d 346 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1127 , 99 S. Ct. 1044 (1979); Horsley v. United States, 583 F.2d 670 (3rd Cir. 1978); United States v. Adams, 566 F.2d 962 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Saft, 558 F.2d 1073 (2d Cir. 1977); Phillips v. United States, 519 F.2d 483 (6th Cir. 1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Rutherford
v.
Rutherford
No. 78-605.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 10th Cir. Motion of American Cancer Society for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae and certiorari granted.