green
Positive treatment
7.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited "but see"
United States v. John Theodore Downing
(3×)
But see Commonwealth v. White, 374 Mass. 132 , 371 N.E.2d 777 (1977), aff'd by an equally divided court, 439 U.S. 280 , 99 S.Ct. 712 , 58 L.Ed.2d 519 (1978).
examined
Cited "but see"
State v. Ann Marie C.
(6×)
But cf. Commonwealth v. White, - Mass. -, 77 Mass.Adv.Sh. 2805, 371 N.E.2d 777, 781 (1977), aff’d by equally divided court, 439 U.S. 280 , 99 S.Ct. 712 , 58 L.Ed.2d 519 (1978).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Commonwealth v. Meehan
The judge concluded that the defendant’s judgment at that time was "dim” and "impaired.” If it should be assumed that this condition would not alone justify suppression of the admissions (compare Commonwealth v. White, 374 Mass. 132 [1977], aff'd by an equally divided court, 439 U.S. 280 *567 [1978], with Commonwealth v. Doyle, ante 132 [1979]), it would still be entitled to count in the judge’s total assessment.
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Martin
See Commonwealth v. White, 374 Mass. 132, 138-139 (1977), aff’d, 439 U.S. 280 (1978) (statements obtained in absence of intelligent and voluntary waiver of Miranda rights may not be considered in determining probable cause to obtain search warrant); Commonwealth v. Haas, 373 Mass. 545 (1977), S.C., 398 Mass. 806 (1986) (unwarned statements solicited from suspect in custody may not be considered in determining probable cause for arrest and search incident to it).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patane
(2×)
See Massachusetts v. White, 439 U. S. 280 (1978) (per curiam) (dividing evenly on the question); see also Patterson v. United States, 485 U. S. 922 (1988) (White, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Scherben
See Commonwealth v. White, 374 Mass. 132, 137-138 (1977), aff'd by an equally divided court, 439 U.S. 280 (1978); Commonwealth v. Silva, 388 Mass. 495, 501-502 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Upton
(2×)
See Commonwealth v. White, 374 Mass. 132, 140 (1977), aff’d by an equally divided Court, 439 U.S. 280 (1978).
examined
Cited "see"
Louisiana Credit Union League v. The United States of America
(4×)
See Clarence LaBelle Post No. 217 v. United States, 580 F.2d 270 (8th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 439 U.S. 1040 , 99 S.Ct. 712 , 58 L.Ed.2d 716 (1979); Disabled American Veterans v. United States, 650 F.2d 1178 (Ct.Cl.1981); 32 Professional Insurance Agents v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 246 (1982); Smith-Dodd Businessman’s Association v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 620 (1975).
examined
Cited "see"
Gill v. State
(6×)
See Commonwealth v. White, 371 N.E.2d 777 (Mass. 1977), aff’d, 439 U.S. 280 , 99 S.Ct. 712 , 58 L.Ed.2d 519 (1978).
examined
Cited "see"
State v. Preston
(3×)
See Massachusetts v. White, 439 U.S. 280 , 99 S.Ct. 712 , 58 L.Ed.2d 519 (1978), affirming without opinion by an evenly divided Court, Commonwealth v. White, - Mass. -, 371 N.E.2d 777 (1977); Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433 , 94 S.Ct. 2357 , 41 L.Ed.2d 182 (1974); Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324 , 89 S.Ct. 1095 , 22 L.Ed.2d 311 (1969). *407 In Orozco , defendant was questioned by the police in his boarding house bedroom at four o’clock in the morning.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Williams
See Commonwealth v. White, 374 Mass. 132, 138 (1977), aff'd by an equally divided court, 439 U.S. 280 (1978); Commonwealth v. Hosey, 368 Mass. 571 , 574 n.1 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Ierardi
Compare Commonwealth v. White, 374 Mass. 132, 140 (1977), affd by an equally divided court, 439 U.S. 280 (1978), where an affidavit, reciting that the defendant possessed one marihuana cigarette in the breast pocket of his shirt at the time of his arrest for operating under the influence, failed to provide a “correlation between the untainted allegations in the affidavit and the presence of controlled substances in the defendant’s car.” The defendant claims error in the judge’s conclusion that “the facts of this case more closely resemble those present in the Miller decision.” We v…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George A. Scalf, Jr.
(3×)
Compare Michigan v. Tucker, 417 U.S. 433, 460-61 , 94 S.Ct. 2357 , 41 L.Ed.2d 182 (1974) (White, J., concurring) (evidence which is a fruit of a violation of prophylactic rules of Miranda should not be excluded) and Wilson v. Zant, 249 Ga. 373 , 290 S.E.2d 442, 447-48 (1982) (fruit of a violation of Edwards is admissible if the confession was voluntary), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 580 , 74 L.Ed.2d 940 (1982) with U.S. v. Downing, 665 F.2d 404, 407-09 (1st Cir.1981) (fruit of Edwards -tainted statement must be suppressed) and Massachusetts v. White, 374 Mass. 132 , 371 N.E.2d 777, 781 (1…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Mallott v. State
(6×)
See, e.g., Commonwealth v. White, ___ Mass. ___, ___, 371 N.E.2d 777, 780 (Mass. 1977), aff'd. mem., 439 U.S. 280 , 99 S.Ct. 712 , 58 L.Ed.2d 519 (1978); People v. Buxton, 44 N.Y.2d 33 , 35, 403 N.Y.S.2d 487 , 488, 374 N.E.2d 384 , 386 (N.Y. 1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
MASSACHUSETTS
v.
WHITE.
v.
WHITE.
77-1388.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 22, 1979.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 33 opinions | Published
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF MASSACHUSETTS.
Barbara A. H. Smith, Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts, argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Francis X. Bellotti, Attorney General, and Stephen R. Delinsky, Assistant Attorney General.
Robert S. Cohen argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.[*]
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
[*] Fred E. Inbau, Wayne W. Schmidt, Robert Smith, and James P. Costello filed a brief for Americans for Effective Law Enforcement, Inc., as amicus curiae urging reversal.