green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1987 ·
…corroborating circumstances must do more than tend to indicate the trustworthiness of the statement; they must clearly indicate it
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1978 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1978
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Maugeri v. State
United States v. Katsougrakis ; [6] United States v. Atkins, 558 F.2d 133 (3rd Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1071 , 98 S.Ct. 1254 , 55 *980 L.Ed.2d 774 (1978); United States v. Brainard ; but see United States v. Satterfield, 572 F.2d 687 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Anderson
(2×)
corroborating circumstances must do more than tend to indicate the trustworthiness of the statement; they must clearly indicate it
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Glover
See United States v. Berry, 571 F.2d 2 , 3 n. 1 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 129 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cunningham v. State
See United States v. Satterfield, 572 F.2d 687, 690 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978); cf. United States v. Bagley, 537 F.2d 162 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1075 , 97 S.Ct. 816 , 50 L.Ed.2d 794 (1977) (utilizes a clearly erroneous standard for appellate review); see also Montgomery v. State, 810 S.W.2d 372, 390-93 (Tex.Crim.App.1990) (general discussion of abuse of discretion for trial court’s action in determining relevance).
cited
Cited "see"
Rhodes v. State
See Butler v. State, 376 So.2d 937 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) (citing United States v. Bynum, 566 F.2d 914 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 129 , 130, 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978)); C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Laurence John Layton
Layton, 720 F.2d at 559-60 (citations omitted); see United States v. Satterfield, 572 F.2d 687, 691 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978) (quoting United States v. Benveniste, 564 F.2d 335, 341 (9th Cir.1977)) (“If Congress had wanted courts to take a restrictive approach to whether a statement is against penal interest, it would not have chosen ‘the broadly worded phrase “tended to subject” ’ in Rule 804(b)(3).”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Payden
To admit statements pursuant to 804(b)(3) the court must find that "corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement.” United States v. Katsougrakis, 715 F.2d at 775 (emphasis added); see United States v. Satterfield, 572 F.2d 687, 693 (9th Cir.) (corroborating circumstances must do more than tend to indicate the trustworthiness of the statement, they must clearly indicate it), cert. denied, .439 U.S. 840, 99 S.Ct. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Fisher
See United States v. Satterfield, 572 F.2d 687 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donovan v. Crisostomo
See United States v. Satterfield, 9 Cir. 1978, 572 F.2d 687, 691 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 , holding that an exception to hearsay rule in Rule 803 is made because the circumstances of the declaration indicate that the declarant's perception, memory, narration, or sincerety concerning the matter asserted in the statement is trustworthy.
discussed
Cited "see"
Donovan v. Crisostomo
See United States v. Satterfield, 9 Cir. 1978, 572 F.2d 687, 691 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 , holding that an exception to hearsay rule in Rule 803 is made because the circumstances of the declaration indicate that the declarant’s perception, memory, narration, or sincerety concerning the matter asserted in the statement is trustworthy.
cited
Cited "see"
People v. Lupton
See United States v. Satterfield, 572 F.2d 687 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eddie Howell and Wayne E. Kittle
United States v. Davis, 546 F.2d 617, 620 (5th Cir. 1977); see United States v. Bynum, 566 F.2d 914, 920 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 129 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Venizelos
See United States v. Berry, 560 F.2d 861 (7th Cir. 1977), modified, 571 F.2d 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 129 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978). 20 . 358 U.S. 307 , 79 S.Ct. 329 , 3 L.Ed.2d 327 (1959). 21 . 433 U.S. 1 , 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977). 22 . 442 U.S. 753 , 99 S.Ct. 2586 , 61 L.Ed.2d 235 (1979). 23 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John B. Calandrella, United States of America v. John A. Kaye
(2×)
United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800 , 94 S.Ct. 1234 , 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974); see United States v. Berry, 560 F.2d 861 (7th Cir. 1977), vacated on other grounds, 571 F.2d 2 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 129 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gray v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Bagley, 537 F.2d 162, 167 (5th Cir.1976); see also United States v. Satterfield, 572 F.2d 687, 692 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978)(discussing in dicta some of the justifications for considering the trustworthiness of the witness when determining whether the admit the hearsay statement).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gentry v. State
(2×)
See also, United States v. Bynum, 566 F.2d 914, 923 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 129 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978); United States v. Apuzzo, 555 F.2d 306, 307 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 435 U.S. 916 , 98 S.Ct. 1470 , 55 L.Ed.2d 507 (1978); United States v. Hawley, 554 F.2d 50, 52 (2d Cir.1977) (after trial court denied motion in limine, defense counsel brought up the subject of prior convictions on direct examination); and United States v. Nelson, 529 F.2d 40, 42 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 426 U.S. 922 , 96 S.Ct. 2631 , 49 L.Ed.2d 377 (1976), (after trial court denied defense m…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Fernandez
Compare United States v. Satterfield, 572 F.2d 687 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978) (held, requiring defendant to wear disguise for identification not improper). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Claude Leander Riley
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Satterfield, 572 F.2d 687 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S.Ct. 128 , 58 L.Ed.2d 138 (1978); United States v. Barrett, 539 F.2d 244 (1st Cir. 1976); United States v. Goodlow, 500 F.2d 954 (8th Cir. 1974) (proposed rules).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gold
Compare United States v. Satterfield, 572 F.2d 687 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 840 , 99 S. Ct. 128 , 58 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thrasher
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 77-6573.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 2, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Wisconsin Supreme Court (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.