green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.5 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“parole eligibility constitutes part of punishment”
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Baker
But cf. Breast v. Helgemoe, 579 F. 2d 95, 101 (1st Cir.) (expressing in dictum the court's "concern that the power of a sentencing court to correct even a statutorily invalid sentence must be subject to some temporal limit"), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 327 , 58 L.Ed. 2d 329 (1978).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
C.T. Akins, Jay M. Fate, Michael Schroeder v. Wayne Snow, Jr., Chairman State Board of Pardons & Paroles
parole eligibility constitutes part of punishment
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
People v. Balderas
(E.g., People v. Soltero (1978) 81 Cal. App.3d 423, 428-429 [ 146 Cal. Rptr. 457 ], cert. den., 439 U.S. 933 *183 [ 58 L.Ed.2d 328 , 99 S.Ct. 325 ]; People v. Orchard (1971) 17 Cal. App.3d 568, 576 [ 95 Cal. Rptr. 66 ].) In People v. Williams (1981) 29 Cal.3d 392 [ 174 Cal. Rptr. 317 , 628 P.2d 869 ], decided six months after defendant Balderas' trial, this court abrogated the Edwards rule that questioning could only pertain to challenges for cause.
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Craft v. State of Alabama.
See United States v. Colyer, 571 F.2d 941 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 325 , 58 L.Ed.2d 328 (1978); United States v. Flora, 558 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Jones, 554 F.2d 251 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 202 , 54 L.Ed.2d 142 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bell
See Wolfrath v. LaVallee, 576 F.2d 965 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 325 , 58 L.Ed.2d 328 (1978); United States v. Harden, 480 F.2d 649 (8th Cir.1973); see also United States v. Thornton, 22 M.J. 574 (A.C.M.R.), pet. denied, 23 M.J. 179 (C.M.A.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rico, Appeal of Elizabeth Baron, A/K/A \Yolanda Mercado\""
See Breest v. Helgemoe, 579 F.2d 95, 101 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 327 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard Bobby Ortega
See Breest v. Helgemoe, 579 F.2d 95, 101 (1st Cir.) (suggesting possible due process limitation on time to correct even a statutorily invalid sentence), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 327 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick Henry Earley
(2×)
See Breest v. Helgemoe, 579 F.2d 95, 101 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 327 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978) (addressing due process issue) Using the due process analysis suggested in Breest and by the Fourth Circuit in United States v. Lundien, 769 F.2d 981 (4th Cir.1985), supra note 7, Earley clearly had a conditionally "date certain" or "crystallized" expectation regarding the length of his sentence no later than March 28, 1985, when he appeared with counsel before the parole commission and it established a release date for him. 1 The judge's May 3, 1985 clarification order was to…
cited
Cited "see"
Curran v. Unis
See, United States v. Colyer, 571 F.2d 941, 942, 947 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 325 , 58 L.Ed.2d 328 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Delmondo
See Breest v. Helgemoe, 579 F.2d 95 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 (1978); United States v. Kenyon, 519 F.2d 1229 (9th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 935 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leigh Raymond Tamura
See United States v. Allen, 579 F.2d 531, 533 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 326 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978); United States v. Polizzi, 500 F.2d 856, 878 (9th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1120 , 95 S.Ct. 802 , 42 L.Ed.2d 820 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. Joel D. Joseph, and Joel D. Joseph v. Howard W. Cannon
See Ray v. Proxmire, 189 U.S.App.D.C. 220, 223 , 581 F.2d 998, 1001 , cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 326 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978) (interpretation and application of Senate rules is usually a matter not for the courts but for the Senate). 55 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lincoln Isaac v. Ted Engle, Superintendent
(2×)
See Breest v. Helgemoe, 579 F.2d 95 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 327 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978); United States v. Williams, 475 F.2d 355 (D.C.Cir.1973). 35 Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Luis Esteban Veytia-Bravo
See United States v. Colyer, 571 F.2d 941 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 325 , 58 L.Ed.2d 328 (1978); United States v. Flom, 558 F.2d 1179 (5th Cir. 1977); United States v. Jones, 554 F.2d 251 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 866 , 98 S.Ct. 202 , 54 L.Ed.2d 142 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Humes
See also Breest v. Helgemoe, 579 F.2d 95, 101 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 327 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978) (stating that, after a substantial period of time, it might be violative of due process for a court to correct even a statutorily invalid sentence in a way which frustrates a prisoner's expectations).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Huff v. State
See United States v. Peden, 556 F.2d 278, 281 (5th Cir.) (concluding that admission of business records did not offend defendant's confrontation rights because, although defendant was not able to cross-examine person making records, defendant had opportunily to cross-examine records custodian), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 871 , 98 S.Ct. 216 , 54 L.Ed.2d 150 (1977); see also United States v. Colyer, 571 F.2d 941, 947 (5th Cir.) (no abuse of discretion in admitting Master Charge tickets where records custodian testified about how records were handled by bank), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 32…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Clinton
See, e.g., Ray v. Proxmire, 581 F.2d 998, 1001 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 326 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978) (upholding 12(b)(6) dismissal of claim brought under 18 U.S.C. § 201 because “bare criminal statute” provides no private cause of action).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Evans v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Montague, 958 F.2d 1094 (D.C.Cic.1992) (ecross-examination on plea agreement triggers Rule 801(d)(1)(B)); Stuart, 718 F.2d at 934-35 (same); see also United States v. Allen, 579 F.2d 531 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 326 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Whitty
See also Breest v. Helgemoe, 579 F.2d 95, 102 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 327 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carl P. Fogel
See also Breest v. Helgemoe, 579 F.2d 95, 101 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 327 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978) (pre-DiFrancesco case applying due process analysis to resentencing). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas C. Allen
See also United States v. Coyler, 571 F.2d 941 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 325 , 58 L.Ed.2d 328 (1978) (court refused to allow defense counsel to ask witness if he was homosexual).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Northeast Bank & Trust Co. v. Soley
See also United States v. Colyer, 571 F.2d 941, 947 , (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 325 , 58 L.Ed.2d 328 (1978) (credit card purchase tickets flagged by proof machine showing purchases made during the time the card was lost or stolen and kept by the bank in a special case file properly admitted in evidence as business records in prosecution for unlawful transportation of lost and fraudulently obtained credit card in interstate commerce); United States v. Ullrich, 580 F.2d 765, 772 (5th Cir.1978) (inventory schedule in the form of a computer printout prepared by Ford Mot…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blackman v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.
See also, Ray v. Proxmire, 581 F.2d 998 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 326 , 58 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978), where the Circuit likened the tort of unfair competition to a “somewhat anomalous creature”, 581 F.2d at 1002 ; it included, among the scope of limited activities, “passing off one’s goods as those of another.” When Hustler elected to publish Black-man’s photographs, it infringed Blackman’s copyrights and acted in unfair competition.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ford Motor Company, a Corporation v. Auto Supply Company, Inc. H. K. Auto Supply, Inc. And Harold H. Karp, Aaa Business Forms and Systems, Inc
See also United States v. Colyer, 571 F.2d 941, 947 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 933 , 99 S.Ct. 325 , 58 L.Ed.2d 328 (1978); United States v. Rose, 562 F.2d 409, 410 (7th Cir. 1977). 11 We conclude that there was proper foundation for exhibit 30 and, therefore, that it was not an abuse of discretion for the district court to admit and rely upon this exhibit. 12 B.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Colyer
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-5264.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 30, 1978.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.