green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Hearn v. Goodwin (In Re Goodwin)
Co., 234 F.2d 942 , 946 (7th Cir.1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 918 , 77 S.Ct. 216 , 1 L.Ed.2d 124 (1956); accord Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corp., 581 F.2d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979); Matter of M & M Transp.
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.
“Any statement that is reason *492 ably calculated to influence the average investor satisfies the ‘in connection with’ requirement of Rule 10b-5.” Hasho, 784 F.Supp. at 1106 , citing SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 , 861-62 (2d Cir.1968), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1454 , 22 L.Ed.2d 756 (1969); accord SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1171 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Reiffin v. Microsoft Corp.
See SEC v. Savoy Industries, 587 F.2d 1149, 1156 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. den., 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Shapiro, Lifschitz & Schram, P.C. v. Hazard
See SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1153 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
McGrath v. Rhode Island Retirement Board
See Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corp., 581 F.2d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.1978) (explaining that “the promise of a pension constitutes an offer which, upon performance of the required service by the employee[,] becomes a binding obligation”), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. First Jersey Securities, Inc.
See SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1168 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied sub nom., Zimmerman v. SEC, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979); SEC v. Universal Major Indus.
discussed
Cited "see"
Cooke v. Lynn Sand & Stone Co.
See Pratt v. Petroleum Production Mgt., Inc. Employee Savings Plan & Trust, 920 F.2d 651 , 661 (10th Cir.1990); accord Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corp., 581 F.2d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir. 1978) cert. den. sub nom Atlas Tack Corp. v. Mahoney, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979) (pre-ERISA case).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Rana Research, Inc.
The genesis of this rule is the early ease of SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 (2d Cir.1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1454 , 22 L.Ed.2d 756 (1969), which established that the connection requirement is satisfied “whenever assertions are made, as here, in a manner reasonably calculated to influence the investing public.” 401 F.2d at 862; accord SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1171 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rana Research, Inc. (D/b/a Vista Group, Ltd.), Securities and Exchange Commission v. Rana Research, Inc. (D/b/a Vista Group, Ltd.), Vipin Sahgal, Robert H. Bretz
The genesis of this rule is the early case of SEC v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co., 401 F.2d 833 (2d Cir.1968) (en banc), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 976 , 89 S.Ct. 1454 , 22 L.Ed.2d 756 (1969), which established that the connection requirement is satisfied "whenever assertions are made, as here, in a manner reasonably calculated to influence the investing public." 401 F.2d at 862; accord SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1171 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker, Watts & Co. v. Miles & Stockbridge
See SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149 , 1170 n. 47 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979); McCarthy v. Barnett Bank of Polk County, 750 F.Supp. 1119, 1126-27 (M.D.Fla.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clair B. Pratt v. Petroleum Production Management, Inc. Employee Savings Plan & Trust
Co., 234 F.2d 942 , 946 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 918 , 77 S.Ct. 216 , 1 L.Ed.2d 124 (1956); accord Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corp., 581 F.2d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pratt v. Petroleum Production Management, Inc. Employee Savings Plan & Trust
Co., 234 F.2d 942 , 946 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 918 , 77 S.Ct. 216 , 1 L.Ed.2d 124 (1956); accord Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corp., 581 F.2d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.
(2×)
See SEC v. Savoy Indus., Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1163 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979); see also Wellman v. Dickinson, 682 F.2d 355, 363-67 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1069 , 103 S.Ct. 1522 , 75 L.Ed.2d 946 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Haeffele v. Hercules Inc.
See Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corp., 581 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979); Gladden v. Pargas, Inc., 575 F.2d 1091 (4th Cir.1978); Rochester Corp. v. Rochester, 450 F.2d 118 (4th Cir.1971); Marvel v. Dannemann, 490 F.Supp. 170 (D.Del.1980); Ha rdy v. H.K.
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Kolentus v. Avco Corporation and Avco Precision Products Division, Avco Corporation, and Chemical Bank
See Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corp., 581 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979) (applying Massachusetts law); Hurd v. Hutnik, 419 F.Supp. 630 (D.N.J.1976) (applying New Jersey law); Cantor v. Berkshire Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Farmers Insurance v. R.B.L. Investment Co.
See Associated Students v. Arizona Board of Regents, 120 Ariz. 100 , 584 P.2d 564 (App.1978), cert. den. 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
See Associated Students of University of Arizona v. Arizona Board of Regents, 120 Ariz. 100 , 584 P.2d 564 (App.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979); Hofmann Co. v. Meisner, 17 Ariz.App. 263 , 497 P.2d 83 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Juan Santoni, Jr. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Co. Inc. v. Vulcan Materials Co., 527 F.2d 772, 774, 779 (7th Cir. 1976); see Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corp., 581 F.2d 1, 4 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1978); International General Eleetric Co. v. Concrete Builders, 104 P.R.R. 1221 (1976); cf. Pabon Salazar v. Ayala, 71 P.R.R. 878 , 881-82 (1950); Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 90 (illust. 15).
cited
Cited "see"
Nash v. City of Oakwood
See, United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. v. Lord, 585 F.2d 860, 862 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1228 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Franklin v. Southern Railway Co.
See generally, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, 190 U.S.App.D.C. 252 , 587 F.2d 1149, 1154 (1978) cert. denied 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 492 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re M&M Transportation Co.
See Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corp., 581 F.2d 1, 4-5 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979); Denzer v. Purofied Down Products Corp., 474 F.Supp. 773, 776 (S.D.N.Y.1979); Hardy v. H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hawksbill Sea Turtle v. Federal Emergency Management Agency
While a Plaintiffs choice of forum is certainly entitled to some deference, that is less true where, as here, “there is an insubstantial factual nexus with the plaintiffs choice.” Comptroller of Currency v. Calhoun Nat’l Bank, 626 F.Supp. 137 , 140 n. 9 (D.D.C.1985); See also SEC v. Savoy Industries, Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1154 (D.C.Cir. 1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979); SEC v. Page Airways, 464 F.Supp. 461 , 464 n. 7 (D.D.C. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James v. City of St. Petersburg, Florida
Compare Sterling v. Village of Maywood, 579 F.2d 1350, 1354 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979) (finding no protected interest in water service where tenant had no contract with utility and could point to no Illinois law providing tenant "with a legitimate claim of entitlement to water service") 12 The former Fifth Circuit has held that an ordinance giving a three-day notice to the owner or tenant prior to termination of water services was inadequate and violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment since it did not give pre-term…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Drexel Burnham Lambert Inc.
See also SEC v. Savoy Industries Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1163 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979); Trans World Corp. v. Odyssey Partners, 561 F.Supp. 1315, 1323 (S.D.N.Y.1983). *608 3.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James v. City of St. Petersburg
Compare Sterling v. Village of Maywood, 579 F.2d 1350, 1354 (7th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979) (finding no protected interest in water service where tenant had no contract with utility and could point to no Illinois law providing tenant "with a legitimate claim of entitlement to water service”). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
(2×)
See, e.g., Associated Students of the Univ. of Arizona v. Arizona Board of Regents, 120 Ariz. 100, 104 , 584 P.2d 564, 568 (Ct.App. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1226 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979). [12] We also granted review of the trial court's summary dismissal of Taylor's punitive damage claim.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wolfrum v. Commissioner
See also Jaggard v. Commissioner , 582 F.2d 1189 , 1190 (8th Cir. 1978) , affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court, cert. denied 440 U.S. 913 , 59 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Belgiovine Enterprises, Inc. v. City Federal Savings Bank
See also SEC v. Savoy Industries, Inc., 587 F.2d 1149 (D.C.Cir.1978) (Section 1404(a) applies to federal securities statutes), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1978); Comptroller of Currency v. Calhoun First National Bank, 626 F.Supp. 137 (D.D.C.1985) (Comptroller of Currency selected venue pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 78aa, but transfer was appropriate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404 (a)); Franklin v. Southern Railway Company, 523 F.Supp. 521 (D.D.C.1981) (transfer of FELA action filed in the District of Columbia was appropriate). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wilson v. American Cablevision of Kansas City, Inc.
See also United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lord, 585 F.2d 860 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1228 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979), in which the Eighth Circuit stated "the district court could have certified this appeal under either § 1292(b) or Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) if it felt that the gravity of the class action certification issue required an expedited hearing by this court.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kuenz v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Paxton, supra, 688 F.2d at 562-63 (citations omitted); see also U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Lord, 585 F.2d 860 , 873 (8th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1228 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Constitutionality of the Social Security Act Amendments of 1983
See also Jaggard v. Commissioner, 582 F.2d 1189 (8th Cir. 1978), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 913 (1979); Graves C ontinued 26 social security system is not an impermissible interference with that individual’s constitutional right to the free exercise of his religion.7 Turning to § 102, we assume, as the Court did in Lee, that there are religious organizations whose tenets would be offended by payments on behalf of employees into the social security system.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pacific Realty Trust v. APC Investment, Inc.
See, e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, 587 F.2d 1149, 1168-69 (D.C.Cir.) (against future failures to disclose), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1978); Klaus v. Hi-Shear Corp., 528 F.2d 225 (against voting stock acquired in violation of the Williams Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pacific Realty Trust v. Apc Investments
See, e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, 587 F.2d 1149, 1168-69 (D.C.Cir.) (against future failures to disclose), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1978); Klaus v. Hi-Shear Corp., 528 F.2d 225 (against voting stock acquired in violation of the Williams Act).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CARRIBA AIR, INC., Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
See, e.g., Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, 587 F.2d 1149 (D.C.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979); Investors Funding Corp. v. Jones, 495 F.2d 1000 (D.C.Cir.1974).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Means v. City of Chicago
See also Sterling v. Village of Maywood, 579 F.2d 1350 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League
See also Securities & Exchange Comm’n v. Savoy Industries, Inc., 587 F.2d 1149, 1156 (D.C.Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1979); Henry v. First Nat’l Bank, 50 F.R.D. 251 (N.D.Miss.), vacated on other grounds, 444 F.2d 1300 (5th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1019 , 92 S.Ct. 1284 , 31 L.Ed.2d 483 (1970) (transfer motion, filed three months after the filing of the original complaint, was denied because several motions and preliminary injunction had already been decided).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Randolph v. Commissioner
(2×)
See also Jaggard v. Commissioner , 582 F.2d 1189 (8th Cir. 1978) , affg. a Memorandum Opinion of this Court, cert. denied 440 U.S. 913 (1979) .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bonar v. Barnett Bank of Jacksonville, N.A.
See, e. g., Hoefel v. Atlas Tack Corp., 581 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 1227 , 59 L.Ed.2d 462 (1978); Rochester Corp. v. Rochester, 450 F.2d 118 (4th Cir. 1971); Smith v. Ethyl Corp., 417 F.Supp. 669 (S.D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Associated Students of the University of Arizona
v.
Arizona Board of Regents
v.
Arizona Board of Regents
No. 78-924.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 21, 1979.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Ct. App. Ariz. Certiorari denied.