green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Fountain v. John E. Graham & Sons
See Claborn v. Star Fish & Oyster Co., 578 F.2d 983 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1281 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Miles v. Melrose
See Claborn v. Star Fish & Oyster Co., 578 F.2d 983, 987 (5th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1281 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979). .
cited
Cited "see"
R.C. Dick Geothermal Corp. v. Thermogenics, Inc.
See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 389 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Aron v. Michigan Health Care Corp.
See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 385 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Calculators Hawaii, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Brandt, Inc. And Reynold M. Hallett, Cross-Appellees
See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 386-88 (9th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381 , 387 n. 7 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979); McCormick, Group Boycotts--Per Se or Not Per Se, That is the Question, 7 Seton Hall L.Rev. 703, 760 (1976) (Klor 's case is complex because it involved both horizontal and vertical restraints) 43 Thus, in Topco the putative vertical restraint was actually a mutual, and thus horizontal restraint among competing distributors regarding the allocation of territory. 405 U.S. at 608-10, 92 S.Ct. at 1133-34.
discussed
Cited "see"
Construction Aggregate Transport, Inc. v. Florida Rock Industries, Inc.
See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381 , 387 n. 7 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979); McCormick, Group Boycotts —Per Se or Not Per Se, That is the Question, 7 Seton Hall L.Rev. 703, 760 (1976) (Klor’s case is complex because it involved both horizontal and vertical restraints). .
cited
Cited "see"
R.C. Dick Geothermal Corp. v. Thermogenics, Inc.
See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 386 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Laurence J. Gordon, Inc. v. Brandt, Inc.
See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 387 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Anderson v. Phoenix Investment Counsel of Boston, Inc.
See Pope v. Atlanta, 240 Ga. 177, 179 (1977), and 242 Ga. 331 (1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Net Realty Holding Trust v. Franconia Properties, Inc.
See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 386 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979); Optivision, Inc. v. Syracuse Shopping Center Associates, 472 F.Supp. 665, 678 (N.D.N.Y.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Betaseed, Inc. v. U & I Inc.
(2×)
See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 386 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979) (this court stated that the first question to be answered is whether the restraint fits any of the four per se categories: horizontal and vertical price-fixing; horizontal market division; group boycotts or concerted refusals to deal; and tie-in sales).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nos. 80-3490, 80-3514
(2×)
See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 386 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979) (this court stated that the first question to be answered is whether the restraint fits any of the four per se categories: horizontal and vertical price-fixing; horizontal market division; group boycotts or concerted refusals to deal; and tie-in sales).
discussed
Cited "see"
Battle v. Lubrizol Corporation
See Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 579 F.2d 126 (2d Cir.) (banc), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 946 , 99 S.Ct. 340 , 58 L.Ed.2d 338 (1978) (applying rule of reason analysis); accord, Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979); H & B Equipment Co. v. International Harvester Co., 577 F.2d 239 (5th Cir. 1978); see generally Comment, Vertical Agreements to Terminate Competing Distributors: Oreck Corp. v. Whirlpool Corp., 92 Harv.L.Rev. 1160 (1979) (supporting Oreck); Comment, Vertical Agreement as Horizontal Restraint: Cernut…
cited
Cited "see"
Jbl Enterprises, Inc. v. Jhirmack Enterprises, Inc.
See Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 389 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed. 494 (1979) ; DeVoto v. Pacific Fidelity Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Artway Caldwell v. Manhattan Tankers Corporation
See Claborn v. Star Fish & Oyster Co., 578 F.2d 983, 987 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1281 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Talking Yellow Pages, Inc., Dba Primex v. Pacific Telesis Group, a Corporation Pacific Bell, a Corporation Pacific Bell Directory, a Corporation
See also Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 390 (9th Cir.1978) (noting that specific intent and probability of success can be inferred from predatory conduct), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 (1979). 2 11 In this case, Primex alleges that its competitor, Pacific Telesis Group ("Pacific"), blocked and disconnected calls to Primex, caused Primex's telephone lines to become inoperable, and refused to repair or delayed in repairing problems with Primex's telephone lines.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
St. Jude Medical, Inc. v. Intermedics, Inc.
See, e.g., Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381, 386 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979); Grason Elec. v. Sacramento Mun.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
M & H Tire Company, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corporation
See, e.g., Gough v. Rossmoor Corporation, 585 F.2d 381 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hennessy v. State
Veracity can be established by showing that the informant is “credible” or that the information given is “reliable.” Alternatively stated, “[t]he affidavit must contain the underlying circumstances which lead to the informant’s conclusion of guilt and underlying circumstances which lead affiant to believe that informant was credible and reliable.” Keen v. State, 626 S.W.2d 309, 312 (Tex.Cr.App.1981); see also Etchieson v. State, 574 S.W.2d 753 (Tex.Cr.App.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1282 , 59 L.Ed.2d 495 (1979); Wood v. State, 573 S.W.2d 207 (Tex.Cr.App.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Determined Productions, Inc. v. R. Dakin & Co.
See, e. g., Gough v. Rossmoor Corp., 585 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1978) cert. denied, 440 U.S. 936 , 99 S.Ct. 1280 , 59 L.Ed.2d 494 (1979) (agreement between local newspaper and a retailer who was plaintiff’s competitor to bar plaintiff from advertising in that newspaper not a per se violation); Mutual Fund Investors, Inc. v. Putnam Management Co., 553 F.2d 620 (9th Cir. 1977) (agreement between mutual fund manager and its brokerage firm not to permit shares to be sold by plaintiff broker not a per se violation); Joseph E.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gough, Trustee in Bankruptcy
v.
Rossmoor Corp.
v.
Rossmoor Corp.
No. 78-1002.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 26, 1979.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.