Cain v. United States, 440 U.S. 975 (1979). · Go Syfert
Search
Cain v. United States, 440 U.S. 975 (1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
94 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 26 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Katz (nyed, 1981-03-09)
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979 2002 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Katz
E.D.N.Y · 1981 · confidence medium
See United States v. Russell, supra; United States v. Corcione, 592 F.2d 111, 115 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 975, 985, 99 S.Ct. 1545 , 1801, 59 L.Ed.2d 794 (1979).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Jose Delacruz Sanchez Solis
2d Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Corcione, 592 F.2d 111, 117 (2d Cir.) (speculation that jury might have been coerced was unsupported by the record), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 975 , 99 S.Ct. 1545 , 59 L.Ed.2d 794 , 440 U.S. 985 , 99 S.Ct. 1801 , 60 L.Ed.2d 248 (1979); United States v. Minieri, 303 F.2d 550, 556 (2d Cir.) (within the discretion of the trial court to determine how long to hold the jury), cert. denied, 371 U.S. 847 , 83 S.Ct. 79 , 9 L.Ed.2d 81 (1962).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Lau Tung Lam, A/K/A \Ah Tong
unknown court · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Corcione, 592 F.2d 111 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 975 , 985, 99 S.Ct. 1585 , 1801, 59 L.Ed.2d 974 , 60 L.Ed.2d 248 (1979).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ferguson
cma · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cain, 587 F.2d 678 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 975 [ 99 S.Ct. 1543 , 59 L.Ed.2d 793 ] (1979).
discussed Cited "see" Wolf Ex Rel. Wolf v. Procter & Gamble Co.
D.N.J. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Blakey, 607 F.2d 779 (7th Cir.1979) (statement recorded between several minutes and 23 minutes after declarant’s observation of event admissible under Fed.R.Evid. 803(1) where substantial circumstantial evidence corroborated statement’s accuracy), United States v. Cain, 587 F.2d 678 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 975 , 99 S.Ct. 1543 , 59 L.Ed.2d 793 (1979) (statement of CB’er that could not have been made immediately after his observance of defendants because defendants had walked five miles past him at time of statement, inadmissible under Fed.R.Evid. 803(1)), …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Jones
Md. · 1987 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Cain, 587 F.2d 678 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 975 , 99 S.Ct. 1543 , 59 L.Ed.2d 793 (1979) where extrinsic evidence demonstrated the CB radio statements could not have been contemporaneous with the event described. .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Cender v. Peters
S.D.N.Y. · 1982 · signal: see also · confidence low
United States v. Russell, 411 U.S. 423, 432 , 93 S.Ct. 1637, 1643 , 36 L.Ed.2d 366 (1973); see also United States v. Corcione, 592 F.2d 111, 115 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 975 , 99 S.Ct. 1545 , 59 L.Ed.2d 794 (1979); United States v. Archer, 486 F.2d 670, 676-77 (2d Cir. 1973). .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Whitaker
N.Y. App. Div. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
Turning to the remaining issues, Payton v New York ( 445 US 573 ) can afford defendant no basis for relief since we, like the Appellate Division, First Department, decline to apply the holding of that case retroactively to cases, such as this one, where the defendant’s warrantless arrest at his residence occurred before the decision in Payton was announced (see People v Benitez, 76 AD2d 196, 199, n 2 ; see, also, United States v Corcione, 592 F2d 111, 117-118, cert den 440 US 975 , 985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." People v. Beckford
N.Y. Sup. Ct. · 1980 · signal: see also · confidence low
The reason for focusing on the date of the search in any case involving the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule is that "we cannot regard as blameworthy those parties who conform their conduct to the prevailing statutory or constitutional or statutory norm * * * If the purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter unlawful police conduct then evidence obtained from a search should be suppressed only if it can be said that the law enforcement officer had knowledge, or may properly be charged with knowledge, that the search was unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment.” (United States v Pelti…
cited Cited "see, e.g." United States v. German Fidel Cueto
5th Cir. · 1980 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., United States v. Henderson, 588 F.2d 157, 159 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 975 , 99 S.Ct. 1544 , 59 L.Ed.2d 794 (1979).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. James A. Blakey and Louis A. Berry
7th Cir. · 1979 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., U. S. v. Cain, 587 F.2d 678, 681-82 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 975 , 99 S.Ct. 1543 , 59 L.Ed.2d 793 (1979); Hilyer v. Howat Concrete Co., Inc., 188 U.S.App.D.C. 180 , 184 n.7, 578 F.2d 422 , 426 n.7 (D.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cain
v.
United States
No. 78-6172.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 26, 1979.
440 U.S. 975
Published

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.