green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1991 ·
…ot only must the injury be direct, but it must be of the kind the antitrust laws were written to guard against.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1998 ·
…where a defendant is improperly convicted for a lesser included offense, the proper remedy is to vacate both the conviction and sentence on the included offense, leaving the conviction and sentence on the greater offense intact
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 44 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jordan v. State
where a defendant is improperly convicted for a lesser included offense, the proper remedy is to vacate both the conviction and sentence on the included offense, leaving the conviction and sentence on the greater offense intact
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kelvin Jordan v. State of Mississippi
where a defendant is improperly convicted for a lesser included offense, the proper remedy is to vacate both the conviction and sentence on the included offense, leaving the conviction and sentence on the greater offense intact
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Judith Nelson and Darci Anne Bowman, Cross-Appellees v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, Formerly Known as the Monroe Clinic, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
ot only must the injury be direct, but it must be of the kind the antitrust laws were written to guard against.
discussed
Cited "see"
Holly v. State
See United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498, 505 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (“where a defendant is improperly convicted for a lesser included offense, the proper remedy is to vacate both the conviction and sentence on the included offense, leaving the conviction and sentence on the greater offense intact”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holly v. State
See United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498, 505 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 ("where a defendant is improperly convicted for a lesser included offense, the proper remedy is to vacate both the conviction and sentence on the included offense, leaving the conviction and sentence on the greater offense intact").
cited
Cited "see"
Alan's of Atlanta, Inc. v. Minolta Corporation, Robert Lathrop, Wolf Camera, Inc., and Charles Wolf
See Lupia v. Stella D’Oro Biscuit Co., 586 F.2d 1163, 1171 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Buchanan v. Commonwealth
See United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498, 505 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Yamaha Store of Bend, Oregon, Inc. v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A.
See Lupia v. Stella D'Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F2d 1163, 1170, (7th Cir 1978), cert den 440 US 982 (1979); NW Medical Lab. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield, 97 Or App 74 , 775 P2d 863 , rev allowed 308 Or 465 (1989), considered an allegedly unreasonable restraint on trade, under ORS 646.725, within a given geographic area. 97 Or App at 80 n 6.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billy L. Massey and Larry P. Wages
See United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498, 505 (5th Cir.1978) (declining to remand case for resentencing where conviction for lesser-included offense was reversed and portion of sentence vacated), reh'g denied, 589 F.2d 1114 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Keystone Resources, Inc. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
When motive and intent are not at issue, summary judgment “is particularly apropos in antitrust cases.” Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football League, 550 F.Supp. 558, 564 (E.D.Pa. 1982), aff'd, 720 F.2d 772 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1215 , 104 S.Ct. 2657 , 81 L.Ed.2d 364 (1984); see Lupia v. Stella D’Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 1163, 1166 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
KFC Corp. v. Marion-Kay Co., Inc.
See Lupia v. Stella D’Oro Biscuit Company, Inc., 586 F.2d 1163, 1173 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Jays Foods, Inc. v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
See Lupia v. Stella D’Oro Company, Inc., 586 F.2d 1163 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Shafer v. Bulk Petroleum Corp.
See Lupia v. Stella D’Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 1163 (7th Cir.1978), cert. den. 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dorothy Jefferson
See United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498, 504-05 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1978); United States v. Newman, 468 F.2d 791, 796 (5th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 905 , 93 S.Ct. 1527 , 36 L.Ed.2d 194 (1973); United States v. Rosenthal, 454 F.2d 1252, 1255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 931 , 92 S.Ct. 1801 , 32 L.Ed.2d 134 (1972). 28 To convict and impose punishment for both would be tantamount to twice convicting and punishing one defendant for a single offense, in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause.
cited
Cited "see"
Bichan v. Chemetron Corp.
See Lupia v. Stella D’Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 1163, 1169 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation
See Lupia v. Stella D'Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 1163, 1169 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979). 14 In contrast, Bichan does not stand in the same shoes as the plaintiffs in Radovich and Nichols.
cited
Cited "see"
Mid-America Regional Bargaining Association v. Will County Carpenters District Council
Accord, Lupia v. Stella D’Oro Biscuit Co., 586 F.2d 1163, 1167 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979). 6 .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Kim Edward Minis
(3×)
Accord, United States v. Weinrich, 586 F.2d 481, 490 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 927 , 99 S.Ct. 2041 , 60 L.Ed.2d 402 and cert. denied sub nom., Blair v. U. S., 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 243 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Jones
See United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498 , 504-505 & n.3 (5th Cir. 1978), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 982 (1979); O’Clair v. United States, 470 F.2d 1199, 1203-1204 (1st Cir. 1972), cert, denied, 412 U.S. 921 (1973); United States v. Spears, 449 F.2d 946 , 948-949 & n.9 (D.C.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Boffa
See United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498 (C.A.5, 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979); F.R.Cr.P. 16(a)(1)(C).
cited
Cited "see"
Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Shell Oil Company
See Lupia v. Stella D’Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 1163, 1166-67 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Felt
See United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498, 506 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weit v. CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT. BANK & TRUST
See Lupia v. Stella D'Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 1163, 1168-69 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979); see also In Re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution M.D.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Weit v. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co.
See Lupia v. Stella D’Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 1163, 1168-69 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979); see also In Re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution M.D.L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Owens
We concluded that there was a rational basis for Congress' finding that "control of the intrastate incidents of traffic in controlled substances was essential to the control of interstate incidents of that traffic." Lopez, 459 F.2d at 953 ; see also United States v. Weinrich, 586 F.2d 481, 489 (5th Cir. 1978) (reaffirming that 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) is constitutional even though no specific proof of a nexus with interstate commerce is required for conviction), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Intimate Bookshop, Inc. v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.
See, e.g., Lupia v. Stella D’Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 1163, 1170 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 *141 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979) (dismissing a Section 2(c) claim because “nowhere has plaintiff shown how these discounts are brokerage discounts in lieu thereof’); Robinson, 272 F.2d at 603-604 (affirming dismissal of Section 2(c) claim where the complaint alleged in a conclusory fashion that the reduction in price was a discount in lieu of brokerage because “[t]he matter covered by section 2(c) is unearned brokerage, per se, not discrimination”); Zeller Co…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward D. Pack
See, e.g., United States v. Clements, 588 F.2d 1030, 1037 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 (1979). 2 9 In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court applies the same legal standard as the district court: 10 Evidence is sufficient to support a criminal conviction if, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, any rational trier of fact could have found the elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Owens
We concluded that there was a rational basis for Congress' finding that "control of the intrastate incidents of traffic in controlled substances was essential to the control of interstate incidents of that traffic." Lopez, 459 F.2d at 953 ; see also United States v. Weinrich, 586 F.2d 481, 489 (5th Cir. 1978) (reaffirming that 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) is constitutional even though no specific proof of a nexus with interstate commerce is required for conviction), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Keithan Jerome Owens
We concluded that there was a rational basis for Congress’ finding that “control of the intrastate incidents of traffic in controlled substances was essential to the control of interstate incidents of that traffic.” Lopez, 459 F.2d at 953 ; see also United States v. Weinrich, 586 F.2d 481, 489 (5th Cir.1978) (reaffirming that 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1) is constitutional even though no specific proof of a nexus with interstate commerce is required for conviction), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 243 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chambers
See United States v. Grubbs, 829 F.2d 18, 19 (8th Cir.1987); United States v. Brantley, 733 F.2d 1429, 1436 (11th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1006 , 105 S.Ct. 1362 , 84 L.Ed.2d 383 (1985); United States v. Jefferson, 714 F.2d 689, 703-06 (7th Cir.1983); see also United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498, 505 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979); United States v. Rosenthal, 454 F.2d 1252, 1255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 931 , 92 S.Ct. 1801 , 32 L.Ed.2d 134 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Chambers
See United States v. Grubbs, 829 F.2d 18, 19 (8th Cir.1987); United States v. Brantley, 733 F.2d 1429, 1436 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1006 , 105 S.Ct. 1362 , 84 L.Ed.2d 383 (1985); United States v. Jefferson, 714 F.2d 689, 703-06 (7th Cir.1983); see also United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498, 505 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979); United States v. Rosenthal, 454 F.2d 1252, 1255 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 931 , 92 S.Ct. 1801 , 32 L.Ed.2d 134 (1972). 121 None of those cases discuss, however, any reason for selecting the consp…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Tyrone Morgan v. United States Department of Justice
Crim.P. 16(d)(1); 2 Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure § 258 (2d ed. 1982); United States v. Pelton, 578 F.2d 701 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 964 , 99 S.Ct. 451 , 58 L.Ed.2d 422 (1978); see also United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498 , 506 & nn. 6-7 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979) (in addition to denying defendant’s discovery request and placing FBI files under seal for purposes of appellate review, the court held that the defendant could not rely on the FOIA to support his claim of entitlement to the files because the files were…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mmr Corporation (La) and James B. Rutland
Id. at 1233 ; see also United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498, 501 (5th Cir.1978) (stating that the defendant must provide “some evidence, but more than a scintilla” to be entitled to an instruction on an affirmative defense), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gerald Kaiser
See also United States v. Buckley, 586 F.2d 498, 503-04 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979) (The court held that failure to file is a lesser offense included in a § 7201 conviction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Oliver L. North v. Lawrence E. Walsh, in His Official Capacities as \Independent Counsel\" and \"Independent Counsel: Iran/contra
The plaintiffs rights in a FOIA action do not depend on his or her identity; “ ‘[t]he Act’s sole concern is with what must be made public or not made public.’ ” United States Dep’t of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1468, 1481 , 103 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989) (citation omitted); see NLRB v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214 , 242 n. 23, 98 S.Ct. 2311 , 2327 n. 23, 57 L.Ed.2d 159 (1978) (stating that person’s rights under FOIA are neither diminished nor enhanced by his “litigation-generated need” for agency documents); accord NLRB v. Se…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastern Auto Distributors, Inc. v. Peugeot Motors of America, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, and Automobiles Peugeot, Societe Anonyme Regie Par Les Articles, a French Corporation And/or Entity, Eastern Auto Distributors, Inc. v. Peugeot Motors of America, Inc., a Foreign Corporation, and Automobiles Peugeot, Societe Anonyme Regie Par Les Articles, a French Corporation And/or Entity
See, e.g., Lupia v. Stella D'oro Biscuit Co., 586 F.2d 1163, 1171 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979); Carlo C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Eastern Auto Distributors, Inc. v. Peugeot Motors of America, Inc.
See, e.g., Lupia v. Stella D’oro Biscuit Co., 586 F.2d 1163, 1171 (7th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979); Carlo C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCall v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Buckley , *Page 1380 5 Cir., 1978, 586 F.2d 498 , 501 , cert. denied , 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979); United States v. Timberlake , 5 Cir., 1977, 559 F.2d 1375 , 1379 ; United States v. Ashley , 5 Cir., 555 F.2d 462 , 466-67 , cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Waldbaum, Inc.
See also United States v. Robinson, supra, 588 F.2d 1041, 1042-1044 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 243 (1979) (only two core figures in common where five were necessary to constitute the offense—operation of "gambling business" [not conspiracy ] in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1955 ).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haff v. Jewelmont Corp.
See, e.g., Lupia v. Stella D’Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 1163, 1167-69 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979); John Lenore & Co. v. Olympia Brewing Co., 550 F.2d 495, 499-500 (9th Cir.1977); GAF Corp. v. Circle Floor Co., 463 F.2d 752 (2d Cir.1972), ce rt. denied, 413 U.S. 901 , 93 S.Ct. 3058 , 37 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1973); but see Handler, Changing Trends in Antitrust Doctrines: An Unprecedented Supreme Court Term —1977, 77 Colum.L.Rev. 979, 996-97 (1977) (arguing that antitrust injury and antitrust standing are "related, but, nonetheless, disparate d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tyrone McEachin
See, e.g., United States v. Weinrich, 586 F.2d 481, 490 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 243 , 441 U.S. 927 , 99 S.Ct. 2041 , 60 L.Ed.2d 402 (1979); United States v. Hyde, 574 F.2d 856, 863 (5th Cir. 1978) (mutually reinforcing and corroborative information from several informants adds significantly to probable cause, even though reliability of individual sources not established). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conservation Council of Western Australia, Inc. v. Aluminum Co. of America
See also Lupia v. Stella D'Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 1163, 1166-67 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979). 2. 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (a) jurisdiction We noted in Section II, supra, that plaintiff’s Complaint appears to plead facts sufficient to invoke this court’s diversity jurisdiction.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jack Weit v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago
(2×)
See also Lupia v. Stella D'Oro Biscuit Co., Inc., 586 F.2d 1163 (7th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1791 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979). 19 STANDING TO MAINTAIN THE VERTICAL CONSPIRACY CLAIMS 20 The District Court noted that plaintiffs lack standing to complain of any injury resulting from Harris' and Central's relationship with their correspondent banks.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Felipe Gonzales and Vincente Rodriguez Ovalle
See, e. g., United States v. Buckley, 5 Cir., 1978, 586 F.2d 498, 501 , cert. denied, 440 U.S. 982 , 99 S.Ct. 1792 , 60 L.Ed.2d 242 (1979); United States v. Timberlake, 5 Cir., 1977, 559 F.2d 1375, 1379 ; United States v. Ashley, 5 Cir., 555 F.2d 462, 466-67 , c ert. denied sub nom.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brazil
v.
Sambo's Restaurants, Inc.
v.
Sambo's Restaurants, Inc.
No. 78-1250.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 2, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2) · Mississippi Supreme Court (2)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.