green
Positive treatment
5.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Baker v. City of Detroit
But cf. Mitchell v. Mid-Continent Spring Co., 583 F.2d 275 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 396 (1979). 96 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Nowinski
See United States v. Geders, 566 F.2d 1227, 1230 (5th Cir. 1978), vacated on other grounds, 585 F.2d 1303 , cert. denied, 441 U.S. 922 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Collins
See United States v. DeParias, 805 F.2d 1447 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 916 , 107 S.Ct. 3189 , 96 L.Ed.2d 678 (1987) (kidnapping and extortion created the probability of using ' interstate entity's funds to pay ransom), and United States v. Chiantese, 582 F.2d 974 (5th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 395 (1979) (attempted extortion of individual could cause depletion of funds of his interstate business). 21 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert F. Collins and John H. Ross
See Scott, 854 F.2d at 699 (juror “concealed]” the “material fact[ ]” that his brother was *1404 a deputy sheriff). 34 In cases like this one, where jurors may have made premature expressions as to guilt, we generally defer to the district court’s decision as to whether the defendant received a fair trial by an impartial jury, as the court is in “a far better position to judge the mood at trial and the predilections of the jury” than is an appellate court that “ha[s] only an insentient record before [it].” United States v. Chiantese, 582 F.2d 974, 980 (5th Cir.1978), cert. de…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Stevens
Coolidge v. New Hampshire, supra, 487 ; see United States v. Seidlitz, 589 F.2d 152, 158-59 (4th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S. Ct. 2030 , 60 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin C. McClelland
(2×)
See United States v. Chiantese, 546 F.2d 135 (5th Cir.), modified en banc, 560 F.2d 1244 (1977), on remand, 582 F.2d 974, 978 , cert. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 395 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Eugene Washington
See United States v. Seidlitz, 589 F.2d 152 (4th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 396 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Thompson
(2×)
See United States v. Seidlitz, 589 F.2d 152 (4th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 396 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Ralph Long
United States v. Dinapoli, 519 F.2d 104, 107-08 (6th Cir. 1975); see United States v. Chiantese, 582 F.2d 974 , 981 & n.17 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 395 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Sweetwine v. State
See United States v. Smith, 584 F.2d 759, 761-762 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S. Ct. 2030 , 60 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William George Dunbar, M. D.
See United States v. Chiantese, 560 F.2d 1244, 1255-56 (5th Cir. 1977) (en banc), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 395 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Telerate Systems, Inc. v. Caro
See Ward v. Superior Court of the State of California, 3 Comp.L.Rep. 206 (Cal.Super.Ct.1972); see also United States v. Seidlitz, 589 F.2d 152 (4th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 396 (1979) (unauthorized phone access to coomputer supports wire fraud conviction where computer source code considered property under statute); Hancock v. Decker, 379 F.2d 552 (5th Cir.1967) (conviction for computer program theft under Texas law).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jimmy Dewitt Webster, Sr., Candido Daniel Santiago, Barry Weinreich, Joe Buhajla, Arthur Byron Murphy, and Clarence Royalston
See, e.g., United States v. Chiantese, 582 F.2d 974, 978 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 395 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hubert Jerome Yonn, Gary Carl Weeks, Hugo Sanes-Saavedra
(2×)
Winebrenner, 147 F.2d at 328 ; see also United States v. Chiantese, 582 F.2d 974, 979 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 395 (1979). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seidel v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
See, e.g., Mitchell v. Mid-Continent Spring Co., 583 F.2d 275 (6th Cir. 1978), cert, denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 396 (1979); Hill v. Western Electric Co., 596 F.2d 99 (4th Cir. 1979); East Texas Motor Freight, supra; Clark v. Mann, 562 F.2d 1104 (8th Cir. 1977); Kyriazi v. Western Electric, 465 F.Supp. 1141 (D.N.J.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ransom Patrick Cross
See also United States v. Geders, 585 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2031 , 60 L.Ed.2d 396 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clifford Grooms v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.
Compare United States v. Chiantese, 582 F.2d 974, 978-80 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 922 , 99 S.Ct. 2030 , 60 L.Ed.2d 395 (1979) (no juror interrogation necessary to investigate misconduct resulting from jurors’ statements) with United States v. Herring, 568 F.2d 1099, 1103-06 (5th Cir. 1978) (judge must interrogate jurors to determine whether jurors were prejudiced by their exposure to excessive media publicity).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cerrella
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-1191.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 23, 1979.
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.