green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
10.8 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gerald B. Murphy, a Minor, by and Through His Parents and Next of Friends, Girlie A. Murphy and William C. Murphy v. United States of America
(t)he standard for awarding a judgment n. o. v. is the same as that applied when ruling on a motion for a directed verdict.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Andrew Ellsworth Morgan v. District of Columbia, (Two Cases)
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
For that reason, “ ‘[p]rison administrators ... should be accorded wide-ranging deference in the adoption and execution of policies and practices that in their judgment are needed to preserve internal order and discipline and to maintain institutional security.’ Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S., at 547 [ 99 S.Ct. at 1878 ].” Id. (ellipsis in original).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Adrian Dunn
See United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 884-85 (9th Cir.) (applying United States v. Donovan, 429 U.S. 413, 423-28 , 97 S.Ct. 658 , 50 L.Ed.2d 652 (1977)), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Vargas
See United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d *197 880, 884-85 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 2408, 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979), and overruled on other grounds by United States v. DeBright, 730 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir.1984). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baran
See Miller v. Federal Land Bank of Spokane, 587 F.2d 415, 420 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979); Malinoski v. Mekody, 48 N.Y.S.2d 940 , 946 (Sup.Ct.1944), aff'd, 269 A.D. 717 , 53 N.Y.S.2d 758 (3d Dep't), app. denied, 269 A.D. 791 , 55 N.Y.S.2d 847 (3d Dep't 1945).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baran
See Miller v. Federal Land Bank of Spokane, 587 F.2d 415, 420 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979); Malinoski v. Mekody, 48 N.Y.S.2d 940 , 946 (Sup.Ct.1944), aff'd, 269 A.D. 717 , 53 N.Y.S.2d 758 (3d Dep’t), app. denied, 269 A.D. 791 , 55 N.Y.S.2d 847 (3d Dep’t 1945).
discussed
Cited "see"
Donald R. Parker v. District of Columbia
(2×)
See Vander Zee v. Karabatsos, 589 F.2d 723, 726 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1066 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raimundo Crespo De Llano, United States of America v. George Antonio Rojas, United States of America v. Justina Garcia Dominguez, United States of America v. Santos Amable Dominguez-Peraza
See United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 889 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979) (evidence of guns seized from defendant's residence relevant to show defendant's involvement in narcotics trade).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Raimundo Crespo De Llano, United States of America v. George Antonio Rojas, United States of America v. Justina Garcia Dominguez, United States of America v. Santos Amable Dominguez-Peraza
See United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 889 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979) (evidence of guns seized from defendant's residence relevant to show defendant's involvement in narcotics trade).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Crespo de Llano
See United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 889 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979) (evidence of guns seized from defendant's residence relevant to show defendant’s involvement in narcotics trade).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Crespo de Llano
See United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 889 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979) (evidence of guns seized from defendant's residence relevant to show defendant’s involvement in narcotics trade).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry J. Nowak, Jr. (86-3184), Pete Alex (86-3255)
See United States v. Parker, 586 F.2d 422 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Gonzalez, Jose D. Ramirez, Juan Payan, Bismark Wilson Arragon, Raul A. Medina, Jaime Brekeman, Juan Pacheco
See United States v. Davis, 582 F.2d 947, 941-52 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frances I. Goodwin
See United States v. Davis, 582 F.2d 947, 951 (5th Cir.1978) (when requesting investigative services, defendant must show specifically the reasons why such services are necessary), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979); United States v. *635 Mundt, 508 F.2d 904, 908 (10th Cir.1974) (same), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 949 , 95 S.Ct. 1682 , 44 L.Ed.2d 103 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Douglas William Brown
See United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 886-87 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter L. Mitchell, Jr.
See United States v. Davis, 582 F.2d 947, 951 (6th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nolan
See United States v. Davis, 582 F.2d 947, 952 (5th Cir.1978) (gross profit of $3,000 on $5,000 resale sufficient to allow jury to infer intent to distribute), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979); United States v. Riggins, 563 F.2d 1264, 1266 (5th Cir.) (profit of $3,000 on $3500 resale sufficient), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 848 , 99 S.Ct. 148 , 58 L.Ed.2d 150 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Nolan
See United States v. Davis, 582 F.2d 947, 952 (5th Cir.1978) (gross profit of $3,000 on $5,000 resale sufficient to allow jury to infer intent to distribute), cert, denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979); United States v. Riggins, 563 F.2d 1264, 1266 (5th Cir.) (profit of $3,000 on $3500 resale sufficient), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 848 , 99 S.Ct. 148 , 58 L.Ed.2d 150 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Milton Blakemore v. John B. Coleman, D/B/A the Fairfax and the Jockey Club
See generally Vander Zee v. Karabatsos, 589 F.2d 723, 726-28 (D.C.Cir.1978) (discussing standard for entering a directed verdict or j.n.o.v.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1066 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stensvad v. MINERS & MERCHANTS BANK, ETC.
(2×)
See Miller v. Federal Land Bank of Spokane (9th Cir.1978), 587 F.2d 415, 424 , cert. den. 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Lynn Hooton
See United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 889 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979); Fed.R.Evid. 404(b), Note of Advisory Committee on Proposed Rules (“No mechanical solution is offered.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Federico
(2×)
See United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 889 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979) (admission of guns in trial of drug distribution and possession not an abuse of discretion).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Billie Blaine Lipps
See United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880, 887 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 *963 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martino
See United States v. Parker, 586 F.2d 422 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979); Jackson, supra. We affirm Scionti’s convictions.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sam C. Martino, Joseph C. Russello and Rolando Gonzalez Rodriguez, Defendants- United States of America v. John Alan Holt, Rosario Palermo, William H. Brown, A/K/A Bill, John D. Fisher, Robert D. Young, Joseph MacAluso A/K/A Joe, Frank Scionti, John Nicholas Lostracco, Sam C. Martino, Paul Guarino, Jimmy Farina, Berton B. Chase, A/K/A Bert, Rolando Gonzalez Rodriguez, A/K/A Roland Rodriguez, Joseph D. Lazzara, A/K/A Joe, Joseph C. Russello, A/K/A Joe and Amalia Morgado, Defendants- United States of America v. Sam C. Martino
See United States v. Parker, 586 F.2d 422 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979); Jackson, supra. We affirm Scionti's convictions.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Stephen Williams
See United States v. Davis, 582 F.2d 947, 952 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
First American Title Company of Nevada, a Nevada Corporation v. Huey James, and Peter Flangas, and United States Internal Revenue Service
See also Miller v. Federal Land Bank of Spokane, 587 F.2d 415, 420 (9th Cir.1978) (holding that under Montana law, even though mortgage is mere security for payment of debt or discharge of obligation, it imposes lien upon entire property mortgaged), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert Burns, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. William Long, Administrator, District of Columbia Detention Center, Appellees/cross-Appellants
The standard for reviewing a j.n.o.v. is the same as for granting it: A j.n.o.v. may be granted and upheld "only when the evidence, together with all inferences that can reasonably be drawn therefrom[,] is so one-sided [in favor of the moving party] that reasonable men could not disagree on the verdict." Tavoulareas v. Piro, 817 F.2d 762, 776 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 870 (1987); see also Vander Zee v. Karabatsos, 589 F.2d 723, 726 (D.C.Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Di Girolamo
See, e.g., United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 2408, 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Dario Dicesare, United States of America v. Kathleen Flannery, United States of America v. Jose Marin
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Davis, 582 F.2d 947, 951 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979); United States v. Cooper, 577 F.2d 1079, 1089 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 868 , 99 S.Ct. 196 , 58 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mack v. Newton
See also Rickman v. Modern American Mortgage Corp., 583 F.2d 155 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2406 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1066 (1979); Imperial Corp. of America v. Frenchman’s Creek Corp., 453 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Theodore MacK Receiver, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Wade Newton, Defendants-Third-Party Equico Lessors, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. G.J. Roberts, Sr., Third-Party Brazos Enterprises, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
See also Rickman v. Modern American Mortgage Corp., 583 F.2d 155 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2406 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1066 (1979); Imperial Corp. of America v. Frenchman's Creek Corp., 453 F.2d 1338 (5th Cir.1972). 115 We recognize that the mere presence of a usury savings clause will not rescue a transaction that is necessarily usurious by its explicit terms, see Nevels, supra, 102 S.W.2d at 1050 , but this is not such a case.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Geraldine v. Carter v. Duncan-Huggins, Ltd.
(2×)
See also Vander Zee v. Karabatsos, 589 F.2d 723, 726 (D.C.Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1066 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Metrocare, Charles D. Fizer, Alonzo McNair Henry P. Armwood, William E. Battle, Jr. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
See, e.g., Vander Zee v. Karabatsos, 191 U.S.App.D.C. 200, 203 , 589 F.2d 723, 726 (1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2407 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1066 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Ford, Robert Little, John Felix, Solomon Johnson, Phillip Usquiano, Marcus Thompson, E. Dene Armstrong
See, e. g., United States v. Martin, 599 F.2d 880 , 887 (9th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom, 441 U.S. 962 , 99 S.Ct. 2408 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1067 (1979); United States v. Young Buffalo, 591 F.2d 506, 512-13 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 950 , 99 S.Ct. 2178 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1055 (1979); United States v. Diaz-Alvarado, 587 F.2d 1002, 1005 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied sub nom, 440 U.S. 927 , 99 S.Ct. 1261 , 59 L.Ed.2d 482 (1979); United States v. Walls, 577 F.2d 690, 699 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 893 , 99 S.Ct. 251 , 58 L.Ed.2d 239 (1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Andrews
v.
United States Hall v. United States and Martin v. United States
v.
United States Hall v. United States and Martin v. United States
No. 78-1624; No. 78-6568; No. 78-6579.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 21, 1979.
441 U.S. 962
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.