green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Langley v. Ryder
Pro. art. 382 (criminal prosecution instituted by way of indictment, information, or affidavit); cf. Barancik v. Investors Funding Corp., 489 F.2d 933 (7th Cir.1973) (section 2283 does not bar issuance of the injunction if the state action was not pending when the federal injunction is sought, even though the state action commenced prior to federal action on the request; but cf. Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979) (contrary view). 1 The Younger doctrine also does not apply here, although for a slig…
cited
Cited "see"
Stile v. COPLEY TP., OHIO
See Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537-38 (6th Cir.1978), ce rt. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,565 Richard J. Smith v. Securities and Exchange Commission, (95-5862/6625), Elaine Cacheris Sandy Harris David M. Rosen and Any Other Persons Acting in Concert Therewith, (95-5862), (95-6625)
See Roth v. Bank of Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 538 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Securities & Exchange Commission
See Roth v. Bank of Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 538 (6th Cir.1978), ce rt. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cabot Corp. v. King
See Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537-38 (6th Cir.1978), cert. granted, 440 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct. 1420 , 59 L.Ed.2d 632 cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wayside Farm, Inc. v. Bowen
See Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537-38 (6th Cir.1978), cert. granted, 440 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct. 1420 , 59 L.Ed.2d 632 , cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers v. Consolidated Rail Corporation
See Roth v. Bank of Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979); Urbain v. Knapp Mfg.
cited
Cited "see"
Division No. 1, Detroit, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
See Roth v. Bank of Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979); Urbain v. Knapp Mfg.
cited
Cited "see"
Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation
See Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, supra, 442 U.S. at 926 , 99 S.Ct. at 2853 , 61 L.Ed.2d at 293.
cited
Cited "see"
James E. Williams and Junior Theobald, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, W. R. Vermillion, Chairman F. N. Strum and Dick Moore, Members of the Board, James E. Williams and Junior Theobald, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, W. R. Vermillion, Chairman F. N. Strum and Dick Moore, Members of the Board
See Williams v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, supra, 442 U.S. at 926 , 99 S.Ct. at 2853 , 61 L.Ed.2d at 293.
discussed
Cited "see"
Goldhaber v. Foley
See Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979); Fitzgerald v. Mountain Laurel Racing, Inc., 464 F.Supp. 263, 269 (W.D.Pa.), aff’d, 607 F.2d 589 (3rd Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 956 , 100 S.Ct. 2927 , 64 L.Ed.2d 814 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kennecott Corporation v. Smith
See Maine v. Thiboutot, --- U.S. ----, 100 S.Ct. 2502 , 65 L.Ed.2d 555 (1980) 6 This case is therefore distinguishable from Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527 (6th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979), upon which appellees rely.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.
See also Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979). "[T]he four considerations applicable to preliminary injunction decisions are factors to be balanced, not prerequisites that must be met." In re DeLorean Motor Co., 755 F.2d at 1229.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frisch's Restaurant, Inc. v. Shoney's Inc.
See also Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537 (6th Cir.1978), cert. dismissed, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979). “[T]he four considerations applicable to preliminary injunction decisions are factors to be balanced, not prerequisites that must be met.” In re DeLorean Motor Co., 755 F.2d at 1229.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Accident Fund v. Baerwaldt
See e.g., Roth v. Bank of the Commonwealth, 583 F.2d 527, 537 (CA.6 1978), cert. dism’d, 442 U.S. 925 , 99 S.Ct. 2852 , 61 L.Ed.2d 292 (1979); Hart v. Ferris State College, 557 F.Supp. 1379 (WD.Mich.1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jones
v.
Committee of Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar
v.
Committee of Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar
No. 78-1590.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 11, 1979.
Published
Appeal from Sup. Ct. App. W. Va. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of cer-tiorari, certiorari denied.