green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.0 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases ·
“the 28 Court does not have federal question jurisdiction over this state law products liability action.”
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Itel Container International Corp. v. Atlanttrafik Express Service, Ltd.
But see Int'l Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 593 F.2d 166 , 179-80 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2884 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979) (dicta) ("there is much to be said in support of the view that, even if the terms of the convention were applicable, the convention was not intended to abrogate the methods of service prescribed by F.R.C.P.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Lopkoff v. Commissioner
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see Sharon v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 515 (1976) , affd. per curiam 591 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir. 1978) , cert. denied 442 U.S. 941 (1979) , in which we overruled Bodzin. ↩ 4.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Drucker v. Commissioner
(2×)
Prior to amendment, subsec. (c)(1)(A) read '(A) as the taxpayer’s principal place of business.’ This amendment applies retroactively to tax years beginning after Dec. 31,1975, except that, for tax years after Dec. 31,1975, and before Jan. 1,1980, the amendment applies 'only to taxable years for which, on the date of the enactment of this Act, the making of a refund, or the assessment of a deficiency, was not barred by law or any rule of law.’ Sec. 113(e).” Bodzin v. Commissioner, 60 T.C. 820 (1973), revd. 509 F.2d 679 (4th Cir. 1975), cert. denied 423 U.S. 825 (1975); but see Sharon v.…
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
(PC) Kern v. Sacramento County Main Jail
the 28 court does not have federal question jurisdiction over this state law products liability action.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
(PC) Howell v. Camargo
See Fayle v. Stapley, 607 F.2d 858, 862 (9th 11 Cir. 1979); Mosher v. Saalfeld, 589 F.2d 438, 441 (9th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 12 (1979). 13 DISCUSSION 14 A. Plaintiff's Claims 15 1.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sweat v. Hull
See Berg v. Kincheloe, 794 F.2d 457, 459 (9th Cir.1986) (“The party opposing summary judgment may not rest on conclusory allegations, but must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.”) (citing Mosher v. Saalfeld, 589 F.2d 438, 442 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2883 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hassan
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1052-53 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979) (holding that officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment by listening to the accused's conversation through a motel wall); Gil v. Beto, 440 F.2d 666, 667 (5th Cir.1971) (concluding that officers did not violate Fourth Amendment by looking through motel room window because the "officers [were] lawfully on the premises and merely observe[d] what was in plain view").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pace
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1051-52 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); United States v. Fisch, 474 F.2d 1071, 1076-78 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 921 , 93 S.Ct. 2742 , 37 L.Ed.2d 148 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Long
See United States v. Broward, 594 F.2d 345 (2d Cir.), cert denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Bogle
(2×)
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F. 2d 1046, 1055 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed. 2d 310 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
The United States v. James Beros, Titus McCue A/K/A Tim McCune Appeal of James M. Beros
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1055 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Randolph Williams
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); United States v. Fisch, 474 F.2d 1071 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 921 , 93 S.Ct. 2742 , 37 L.Ed.2d 148 (1973). 106 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Valentine
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046 , 1049-50 n. 4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Easley v. University of Michigan Board of Regents
See Mosher v. Saalfeld, 589 F.2d 438 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2883 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979) (affirming summary judgment for defendants charged with an unlawful search and seizure where plaintiff failed to present particular allegations or evidence supporting her claim); Package Machinery, supra (dismissing complaint where plaintiff alleged that defendant stole trade secrets, but where plaintiff refused to state with specificity which secrets were stolen); Pace, supra; German, supra. Accordingly, defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is granted.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mullen v. Sweetwater Development Corp.
See International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 593 F.2d 166, 181, n. 18 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2884 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979) (When a complaint sufficiently pleads fraud pertaining to a contract or option to purchase shares, the plaintiffs have standing to sue under the 1934 Act.); Brooks v. Land Drilling Co., 564 F.Supp. 1518 (D.Colo.1983) (A merger agreement that was rescinded before performance constituted a purchase or sale of a security within the meaning of § 10(b).); Commerce Reporting Co. v. Puretec, Inc., 290 F.Supp. 715 (S.D.N.Y.1968) (A suit under § 10(b) m…
cited
Cited "see"
Yoder v. Orthomolecular Nutrition Institute, Inc.
See International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 593 F.2d 166 , 181 n. 18 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2884 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Yoder v. Orthomolecular Nutrition Institute, Inc.
See International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 593 F.2d 166 , 181 n. 18 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2884 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Piper Acceptance Corp. v. Slaughter
See International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 593 F.2d 166 , 175 n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2884 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979), Robinson v. Penn Central Co., 484 F.2d 553 (3d Cir.1973), Emerson v. Falcon Mfg., Inc., 333 F.Supp. 888 (S.D.Tx.1971); C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Jose A. Fonseca v. Donald T. Regan, Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, United States of America v. United States Currency Amounting to the Sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000.00) More or Less, and Republic of Colombia and the State of New York, and Jose A. Fonseca
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1057 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); United States v. Catano, 553 F.2d 497 , 500 n. 3 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Ogden, 484 F.2d 1274, 1274-75 (9th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 987 , 94 S.Ct. 2392 , 40 L.Ed.2d 764 (1974); United States v. Pardo-Bolland, 348 F.2d 316, 324 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 944 , 86 S.Ct. 388 , 15 L.Ed.2d 353 (1965); United States v. Madalone, 492 F.Supp. 916, 919 (S.D.Fla.1980); State v. Carroll, 111 Ariz. 216 , 526 P.2d 1238, 1240 (1974) (en banc); State v. T…
discussed
Cited "see"
Fonseca v. Regan
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1057 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); United States v. Catano, 553 F.2d 497 , 500 n. 3 (5th Cir.1977); United States v. Ogden, 484 F.2d 1274, 1274-75 (9th Cir.1973), ce rt. denied, 416 U.S. 987 , 94 S.Ct. 2392 , 40 L.Ed.2d 764 (1974); United States v. Pardo-Bolland, 348 F.2d 316, 324 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 382 U.S. 944 , 86 S.Ct. 388 , 15 L.Ed.2d 353 (1965); United States v. Madalone, 492 F.Supp. 916, 919 (S.D.Fla.1980); State v. Carroll, 111 Ariz. 216 , 526 P.2d 1238, 1240 (1974) (en banc); State v. …
cited
Cited "see"
Loiseau v. Dept. of Human Resources of State of Or.
See Mosher v. Saalfeld, 589 F.2d 438, 442 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2883 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Morrissey
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1055 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); United States v. Medical Therapy Sciences, Inc., 583 F.2d 36 (2d.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Foushee
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1055 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David T. Lace, Roger R. Ducharme, Gary D. Butts, Patricia Eckman, and Glenn Pollack
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046 , 1053 n.12 (5th Cir.) (“[T]his court may, under different facts, find a Fourth Amendment violation even though the government agents make their observations from an ‘open field’ ”), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); United States v. Brown, 487 F.2d 208, 210 (4th Cir. 1973) (observing, even as to one-time appearance on property, “It is a bit disquieting that we must countenance federal snooping around farmers’ barns as a legitimate investigative technique”), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 909 , 94 S.Ct. 1617 , …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eddie Howell and Wayne E. Kittle
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1056 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sam Goody, Inc.
See United States v. Broward, 594 F.2d 345 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); United States v. Brown, 602 F.2d 1073 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 952 , 100 S.Ct. 427 , 62 L.Ed.2d 323 (1979); United States v. Fields, 592 F.2d 638 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 917 , 99 S.Ct. 2838 , 61 L.Ed.2d 284 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bright
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1055-56 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979). 50 Inasmuch as the indictment alleged payoffs were made by the Camelot to buy "freedom from interference by the Sheriff's Department with any prostitution or other activities conducted" there, we cannot say a lack of interference with or investigation of alleged drug use at the Camelot was irrelevant to the indictment.
cited
Cited "see"
King v. Commissioner
See Sharon v. Commissioner , 66 T.C. 515 (1976) , affd. 591 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir. 1978) , cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 ↩ (1979) . 7.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bright
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1055-56 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Churukian v. Commissioner
See Sharon v. Commissioner, 66 T.C. 515 (1976) , aff'd. per curiam, 591 F.2d 1273 (9th Cir. 1978) , cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 ↩ (1979) . 5.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Day Drew Luttrell
See United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1056 (5th Cir.), rehearing denied, 591 F.2d 1343 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); United States v. Coades, 549 F.2d 1303, 1306 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. Christian, 427 F.2d 1299, 1303 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 909 , 91 S.Ct. 153 , 27 L.Ed.2d 148 (1970).
cited
Cited "see"
Donner v. Tams-Witmark Music Library, Inc.
See International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 593 F.2d 166 , 175 n.5 (2d Cir.) cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2884 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lenarz
Shillinger v. Haworth, supra, 70 F.3d 1143 ; see also United States v. Broward, 594 F.2d 345, 351 (2d Cir.) (“the sanction [of dismissal] is so drastic that, especially [when] serious criminal misconduct is involved, it must be reserved for the truly extreme cases”), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S. Ct. 2882 , 61 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McCain
See, e.g., United States v. Broward, 594 F.2d 345, 351 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mizell
See, e.g., *280 United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1055 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979).(3) The truth of out-of-court statements made by the defendant has been attacked.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ross
Such cross-examination, even if vigorous, is proper “in order to demonstrate any possible bias or prejudice arising out of the witness’ financial interest in the outcome of the prosecution.” Id. at 1063 (footnote omitted); see United States v. Thomas, 768 F.2d 611, 618 (5th Cir. 1985); State v. Kellogg, 350 So. 2d 656, 658 (La. 1977). “[A]rguing that the [witness’s] testimony is not credible does not constitute an attack on the [witness’s] reputation for truthfulness within the meaning of [Federal] Rule 608.” United States v. Danehy, 680 F.2d 1311, 1314 (11th Cir. 1982); see also…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sahin v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1055 (5th Cir.) (character evidence of the trait for truthfulness not relevant to the criminal charge of conspiracy to distribute heroin and not admissible as circumstantial evidence of innocence of this crime), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); Grant v. State, 55 Md.App. 1, 39 , 461 A.2d 524, 540 , cert. granted, 466 A.2d 39 (1983), and cert. dismissed, 299 Md. 309 , 473 A.2d 455 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Miller
See, e.g., United States v. Jackson, 5 Cir.1979, 588 F.2d 1046, 1055 , cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 . (3) The truth of out-of-court statements made by the defendant has been attacked.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lamartiniere v. Allstate Insurance Co.
See, e.g., U.S. v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir.1979) cert. denied, [ 442 U.S. 941 ] 99 S.Ct. 2882 [ 61 L.Ed.2d 310 ] (listening through crack at bottom of connecting motel room door did not violate Fourth Amendment); Gil v. Beto, 440 F.2d 666 (5th Cir.1971) (peering through partially opened Venetian blinds into defendant’s motel room was not illegal search).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mikal Habeeb Amuny, A/K/A James Anderson, A/K/A Jim Waters, and A/K/A Wayne Roberson, George Ellis Gaston, and Royce David Hebert
(2×)
We also recognized in that case that merely because “ ‘the policeman may have to crane his neck, or bend over, or squat, does not render the [plain view] doctrine inapplicable, so long as what he saw would have been visible to any curious passerby.’ ” Id. at 1314 (emphasis in opinion) (quoting James v. United States, 418 F.2d 1150 , 1151 n. 1 (D.C.Cir. 1969)); see also United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1053 (5th Cir.), (“[W]e have not hesitated to find an illegal search where the government agent trespasses in order to secure his plain view.”), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 9…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morley v. Cohen
See, e.g., International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 593 F.2d 166 , 175 n. 5 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2884 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979); Robinson v. Penn Central Co., 484 F.2d 553, 555-56 (3d Cir.1973); Piper Acceptance Corp. v. Slaughter, 600 F.Supp. 169, 171-72 (D.Colo.1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Everage
Compare United States v. Darland, 626 F.2d 1235 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1157 , 102 S.Ct. 1032 , 71 L.Ed.2d 315 (1982), with United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
VINCENT MURPHY CHEV. CO., INC. v. United States
See also, Hart v. United States, 585 F.2d. 1280, 1283-85 (5th Cir.1978) cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); Hatter v. United States, 402 F.Supp. 1192, 1193-94 (E.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pioneer Properties, Inc. v. Martin
See, e.g., International Controls Corp. v. Vesco, 593 F.2d 166 , 175 n. 5 (2d Cir.) cert. denied 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2884 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979); Oetiker v. Jurid Werke, G.m.b.H., 181 U.S.App.D.C. 124 , 556 F.2d 1 (1977); Robinson v. Penn Central Co., 484 F.2d 553 (3rd Cir.1973); Travis v. Anthes Imperial Ltd., supra; Warren v. Bokum Resources Corp., 433 F.Supp. 1360 (D.N.M.1977); Bertozzi v. King Louie Int., Inc., 420 F.Supp. 1166 (D.R.I.1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pittsburgh Terminal Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
See, e.g., International Controls Corp. v. Ves-co, 593 F.2d 166 , 181 n.18 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2884 , 61 L.Ed.2d 311 (1979); Davis v. Davis, 526 F.2d 1286 , 1289 & n.4 (5th Cir. 1976); Fenstermacher v. Philadelphia National Bank, 493 F.2d 333 , 336 n.4 (3d Cir. 1974); Walling v. Beverly Enterprises, 476 F.2d 393 , 396 n.5 (9th Cir. 1973); Green v. Hamilton Intern.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Bowden
It is equally well recognized that once a witness’s credibility has been attacked, whether it is by the introduction of evidence of bad reputation, conviction of crime, inconsistent statements, evidence of *269 misconduct, or by an incisive cross-examination, the party calling the witness has a right to present evidence designed to rehabilitate the witness’s credibility. 1 State v. Ouimette, 110 R.I. 747, 760-61 , 298 A.2d 124, 133-34 (1972); see also United States v. Jackson, 588 F.2d 1046, 1055 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); Thomas v. Stat…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leo Eugene Strini
Compare, United States v. Broward, 594 F.2d 345, 351 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L,Ed.2d 310 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER, ETC. v. Bergland
See also Hart v. United States, 585 F.2d 1280, 1283-85 (5th Cir. 1978) cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 (1979); Grosz v. Andrus, 556 F.2d 972, 974-75 (9th Cir. 1977); Hatter v. United States, 402 F.Supp. 1192, 1193-94 (E.D.Cal.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Curtis Hewitt
See, e. g., United States v. Jackson, 5 Cir. 1979, 588 F.2d 1046, 1055 , cert. denied, 442 U.S. 941 , 99 S.Ct. 2882 , 61 L.Ed.2d 310 . (3) The truth of out-of-court statements made by the defendant has been attacked.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mosher
v.
Saalfeld
v.
Saalfeld
No. 78-1619.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 18, 1979.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. California (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.