green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.2 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mercy Medical Center, Inc. v. United Healthcare of Mid-Atlantic, Inc.
n appellate court will affirm 'where the 373 record in a case adequately demonstrates that the decision of the trial court was correct, although on a reason not relied upon by the trial court and perhaps not even raised by the parties.
discussed
Cited "see"
Yates v. State
See Robeson v. State, 285 Md. 498, 507 , 403 A.2d 1221 (1979) (“The law in this State is settled that where a witness later gives testimony, without objection, which is to the same effect as earlier testimony to which an objection was overruled, any error in the earlier ruling is harmless.”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 680 , 62 L.Ed.2d 654 (1980); Peisner v. State, 236 Md. 137, 145 , 202 A.2d 585 (1964) (any error in the admission of testimony “was rendered harmless” by the admission of competent “evidence to the same effect”), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 1001 , 85 S.Ct. 72…
discussed
Cited "see"
Walton v. Davy
See Robeson v. State, 285 Md. 498, 502 , 403 A.2d 1221 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 680 , 62 L.Ed.2d 654 (1980); Offutt v. Montgomery County Bd. of Educ., 285 Md. 557, 563 , 404 A.2d 281 (1979) and Burwell v. Easton Memorial Hosp., 83 Md.App. 684, 691 , 577 A.2d 394 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clark v. State
See Robeson v. State, 285 Md. 498, 502 , 403 A.2d 1221 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 680 , 62 L.Ed.2d 654 (1980). 5 As we have seen, appellant timely requested an instruction on the consequences of a verdict of not criminally responsible and timely excepted to the court’s failure to give such an instruction.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Beverly B.
See Robeson v. State, 285 Md. 498, 507 , 403 A.2d 1221 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 680 , 62 L.Ed.2d 654 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Webster v. State
(2×)
See Robeson v. State, 285 Md. 498, 502 , 403 A.2d 1221 (1979), cert. denied, Robeson v. Maryland, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 680 , 62 L.Ed.2d 654 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hay Associates
See Francois v. Francois, 599 F.2d 1286 , 1294 n.6 (3d Cir. 1979), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 679 , 62 L.Ed.2d 653 (1980); Joiner Systems, Inc. v. AVM Corp., 517 F.2d 45, 48-49 (3d Cir. 1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarence Duane Hendricks
See United States v. Umbower, 602 F.2d 754, 758-59 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 678 , 62 L.Ed.2d 652 (1980). 6 Finding no statutory violation of appellant’s speedy trial rights we now turn to his Sixth Amendment claim, which raises a related, but different, guarantee.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerald Issac Sassoon v. Leroy Stynchombe, Sheriff and Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of the State of Georgia
See generally United States v. Umbower, 602 F.2d 754 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 678 , 62 L.Ed.2d 652 (1980); United States v. Scallion, 548 F.2d 1168, 1173 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 943 , 98 S.Ct. 2843 , 56 L.Ed.2d 784 (1978). *373 On August 21, 1975, Sassoon was removed to the Clayton County jail.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Payne v. State
Although this argument does not appear to have been raised in the trial court, this Court may “affirm the trial court if it reached the right result for the wrong reasons.” In re: Delric H., 150 Md.App. 234 , 241 n. 7, 819 A.2d 1117 (2003) (quoting Hurt v. Chavis, 128 Md.App. 626, 640 , 739 A.2d 924 (1999)); see also Robeson v. State, 285 Md. 498, 502 , 403 A.2d 1221 (1979) (where the record in a case adequately demonstrates that the trial court's decision was correct, although not on grounds relied upon by trial court or argued by parties, appellate court will affirm), cert, denied, 444 U…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Abrams v. Lamone
(2×)
See also Id., 448 A.2d at 939 , citing Robeson v. State, 285 Md. 498, 502 , 403 A.2d 1221, 1223 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 680 , 62 L.Ed.2d 654 (1980) (holding an appellate court will address an issue sua sponte, even if not raised by the appellee, "under the principle that a judgment will ordinarily be affirmed on any ground adequately shown by the record, whether or not relied on by the trial court or raised by a party"). [20] See 68 Opinions of the Attorney General 48 (1983). [21] The current procedures for admitting attorneys in this State have their origin in Chapter …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Frederick v. Pickett
See Berman, 308 Md. at 263 , 518 A.2d at 728 ; see also Robeson, 285 Md. at 502 , 403 A.2d at 1223 (and cases cited therein), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 680 , 62 L.Ed.2d 654 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Maryland State Police v. Zeigler
(2×)
See also the discussion in Robeson v. State, 285 Md. 498, 501-504 , 403 A.2d 1221, 1223-1224 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 680 , 62 L.Ed.2d 654 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lempert v. Singer
V.I.Code Ann. tit. 1, § 4 (1967); see, e.g., Francois v. Francois, 599 F.2d 1286, 1291 , 16 V.I. 130 (3d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 679 , 62 L.Ed.2d 653 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lempert v. Singer
Code Ann. tit. 1, § 4 (1967); see e.g., Francois v. Francois, 599 F.2d 1286, 1291 , 16 V.I. 130 (3d Cir 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S. Ct. 679 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Parham v. State
See, e.g., Robeson v. State, 39 Md.App. 365, 383 , 386 A.2d 795 (1978), aff'd, 285 Md. 498 , 403 A.2d 1221 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 680 , 62 L.Ed.2d 654 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Divel v. Divel
See also Francois v. Francois, 599 F.2d 1286 (3rd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 679 , 62 L.Ed.2d 653 (1980); Golder v. Golder, 110 Idaho 57 , 714 P.2d 26 (1986); Eubanks v. Eubanks, 273 N.C. 189 , 159 S.E.2d 562 (1968); Bohn v. Bohn, 420 S.W.2d 165 (Tex.Civ.App.1967).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ewing v. Johnston
Ellison, supra; Shockey, supra; Hill, supra; see also Ferrell v. State, 149 Ga. App. 405 (4) ( 254 SE2d 404 ), U. S. cert. den. 444 U. S. 1021 ; Gibbs v. Gianaris, 137 Ga. App. 18 (2) ( 223 SE2d 4 ). 4.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Reed
See, e.g., Francois v. Francois, 599 F.2d 1286, 1292 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 , 100 S.Ct. 679 , 62 L.Ed.2d 653 (1980) (spouses); Comment, The Confidential Relationship Theory, supra, 29 Fordham L.Rev. at 564, 566. 32 Rather, the existence of a confidential relationship must be determined independently of a preexisting family relationship.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tichnell v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Robeson v. State, 285 Md. 498 , 403 A.2d 1221 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1021 ; S & S Bldg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Umbower
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-5523.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1980.
444 U.S. 1021
Published
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.