Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 444 U.S. 1102 (1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 444 U.S. 1102 (1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case · …so long as the service provides a special benefit, above and beyond that which accrues to the public at large, to a readily-identifiable individual, the fee is permissible. ⚠ not in text
190 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 50 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Richard N. Bell v. Cameron Taylor (ca7, 2016-07-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Richard N. Bell v. Cameron Taylor
7th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
to be 'final' for purposes of collateral estoppel the decision need only be immune, as a practical matter, to reversal or amendment. 'finality' in the sense of is not required.
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Shoreline Alliance v. Tennessee Valley Authority (2×)
W.D. Tenn. · 2013 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
so long as the service provides a special benefit, above and beyond that which accrues to the public at large, to a readily-identifiable individual, the fee is permissible.
cited Cited "see" Cabble v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307, 1312 ([4]th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).” 667 F.2d at 1178-79 (footnote omitted).
discussed Cited "see" Nuclear Metals, Inc. v. Low-Level Radioactive Waste Management Board
Mass. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 601 F.2d 223 , 229 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 (1980). 9 The assertion that the board has failed timely to meet certain of the Federal milestones is a complaint about the quality of the board’s services that does not affect their basic character as regulatory services essential to the plaintiff.
cited Cited "see" B.N.E. Swedbank, S.A. v. Banker
S.D.N.Y. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Miller Brewing Co. v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 605 F.2d 990, 995-96 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); Lummus Co., 297 F.2d at 89 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Tykwinski
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Jarzab, 123 Ariz. 308, 310 , 599 P.2d 761, 763 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1069 , 62 L.Ed.2d 789 (1980).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gerena
D. Conn. · 1988 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307, 1312 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
cited Cited "see" Satellink of Chicago, Inc. v. City of Chicago
Ill. App. Ct. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Haughton v. Haughton (1979), 76 Ill. 2d 439, 445-46 , 394 N.E.2d 385 , cert. denied (1980), 444 U.S. 1102 , 62 L.
discussed Cited "see" Scott v. United States
M.D. Tenn. · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 ; United States v. Caggiano, 667 F.2d 1176 (5th Cir.1982); United States v. Lawson, 545 F.2d 557 (7th Cir.1975); United States v. Civella, 533 F.2d 1395 (8th Cir.1976). 15 .
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Gerald F. Johnson, United States of America v. Thomas Johnson, United States of America v. Edward T. Wooten (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
Sec. 2518 (3)(c) (1976) 55 See June Application, App. 84-107 56 See United States v. Martinez, 588 F.2d 1227, 1231-32 (9th Cir.1978); United States v. Vento, 533 F.2d at 849-50 ; United States v. Kalustian, 529 F.2d 585, 589-90 (9th Cir.1975); NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE REVIEW OF FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS RELATING TO WIRETAPPING AND ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE, ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE 14 (1976) 57 United States v. Wooten, mem. op. at 5, reprinted in App. 21 58 E.g., United States v. Diadone, 558 F.2d 775, 780 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1064 , 98 S.Ct. 1239 , 55 L.Ed.2d 765 (1978); United…
cited Cited "see" People v. Nieves
Ill. · 1982 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, United States v. Diana (4th Cir. 1979), 605 F.2d 1307 , 1315, cert. denied (1980), 444 U.S. 1102 , 62 L.
cited Cited "see" Yosemite Park v. United States
Ct. Cl. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 601 F.2d 223 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 (1980).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Louis Anthony Caggiano and Robert Edward Napolitano, A/K/A \Bobby Napp\""
5th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See, United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307 , 1312 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JT30243
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Boyer, 106 Ariz. 32, 34 , 470 P.2d 439, 441 (1970), cited in State v. Jarzab, 123 Ariz. 308, 312 , 599 P.2d 761, 765 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1069 , 62 L.Ed.2d 789 (1980), cited in State v. Clevidence, 153 Ariz. 295, 297 , 736 P.2d 379, 381 (App.1987), cited in State v. Oliver, 169 Ariz. 589, 593 , 821 P.2d 250, 254 (App.1991), cited in State v. Blackmore, 183 Ariz. 473, 476 , 904 P.2d 1297, 1300 (App.1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Serna
Ariz. Ct. App. · 1993 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Jarzab, 123 Ariz. 308, 311 , 599 P.2d 761, 764 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1069 , 62 L.Ed.2d 789 (1980) (although lacking sufficient information for probable cause to arrest, the Fourth Amendment does not require an officer to “simply shrug his shoulders and allow a crime to occur or a criminal to escape” (quoting Terry, 392 U.S. at 23 , 88 S.Ct. at 1881 )).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Brandt v. R & D Trucking Co., Inc. (In Re Lissner Corp.)
N.D. Ill. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Miller Brewing Co. v. Joseph Schlitz Brewing Co., 605 F.2d 990, 996 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Florida Power & Light Co. v. United States (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 601 F.2d 223 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1066 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Florida Power & Light Company v. United States of America and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Wisconsin Electric Power Company v. United States of America and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Arkansas Power & Light Company v. United States of America and Nuclear Regulatory Commission (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n, 601 F.2d 223 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1066 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Mosko
D. Colo. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307, 1315-1316 (4th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980)(fact that defendant produced no evidence that tapes were altered or tampered with was important factor in decision to admit evidence).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Persico
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. McGrath, 622 F.2d 36, 43 (2d Cir.1980) (eight day delay excused where there was no evidence of prejudice to defendant or foul play); Vazquez, 605 F.2d at 1279 (seven to thirteen day delays excused where no bad faith on part of the government was found); Scafidi, 564 F.2d at 641 (seven day delay excused since it was not the result of any attempt to avoid sealing requirement or gain a tactical advantage); Fury, 554 F.2d at 533 (six days excused); United States v. Poeta, 455 F.2d 117, 122 (2d Cir.) (thirteen days excused), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 948 , 92 S.Ct. 2041 , 3…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sohio Transportation Company v. The United States (2×)
Fed. Cir. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mississippi Power & Light v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n (NRC), 601 F.2d 223 (5th Cir.1979), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1066 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980) (NRC empowered under IOAA to charge for EIS because EIS is prerequisite for license and part of cost of providing special benefit to licensee). 12 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Gambale
D. Mass. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307, 1315 (4th Cir.1979) (“No reason is apparent why the government could not have obtained a court order to unseal the specific tapes it needed.”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Classic Instruments, Inc. v. VDO-Argo Instruments, Inc.
Or. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Miller Brewing Co. v. Joseph Schütz Brewing Co., 605 F2d 990, 996 (7th Cir 1979), cert den 444 US 1102 (1980) (partial summary judgment based on collateral estoppel).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Wiley (2×)
Ariz. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
To determine whether the seizure and ensuing search were reasonable, our inquiry is two-fold: “first, one must consider ‘whether the ... action was justified at its inception’; second, one must determine whether the search as actually conducted ‘was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.’ ” New Jersey v. T.L.O., 36 Crim.L.Rep. 3091, 3095 (U.S. 16 Jan.1985); see also State v. Jarzab, 123 Ariz. 308, 310 , 599 P.2d 761, 763 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1069 , 62 L.Ed.2d 789 (1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor v. Carolina Stalite Company, (Two Cases.)
D.C. Cir. · 1984 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Marshall v. Donofrio, 465 F.Supp. 838, 839 (E.D.Pa.1978), aff'd mem., 605 F.2d 1196 (3d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); Secretary of Labor v. Waukesha Lime & Stone Co., 3 F.M.S.H.R.C. 1702, 1703-04 (1981); Secretary of Labor v. Baker Coal Co., 2 F.M.S.H.R.C. 2626, 2628 (1980). 3 .
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Alfred M. Lawson
4th Cir. · 1982 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Diana, 605 F.2d 1307 (4th Cir. 1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1102 , 100 S.Ct. 1067 , 62 L.Ed.2d 787 (1980); United States v. Calabro, 467 F.2d 973 (2d Cir. 1972) cert. denied Tortorello v. United States, 410 U.S. 926 , 93 S.Ct. 1357 , 35 L.Ed.2d 587 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mississippi Power & Light Co.
v.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
No. 79-782.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1980.
444 U.S. 1102
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 22 opinions  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 75%
Citer courts: W.D. Tennessee (2) · Seventh Circuit (1)

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.