green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“Rule 609(a) limits the balancing test to determining prejudicial effect to the defendant.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 23 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tussel v. Witco Chemical Corp.
rule 609(a) limits the balancing test to determining prejudicial effect to the defendant.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Joseph Hogan, A/K/A Hal Winter Michael Trupei
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); United States v. Fratus, 530 F.2d 644, 647 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 130 , 50 L.Ed.2d 118 (1976); United States v. Stone, 472 F.2d 909, 913 (5th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1020 , 101 S.Ct. 586 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); United States v. Gray, 421 F.2d 316, 317 (5th Cir.1970); see also United States v. Birdsell, 775 F.2d 645, 648 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1119 , 106 S.Ct. 1979 , 90 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lloyd Ray Piche, United States of America v. Lloyd Ray Piche
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 821 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); United States v. Guillette, 547 F.2d 743, 749 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 839 , 98 *712 S.Ct. 132, 54 L.Ed.2d 102 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald G. Auen
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Theodore Robert Bundy v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of Florida
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); United States v. Fratus, 530 F.2d 644, 647 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 846 , 97 S.Ct. 130 , 50 L.Ed.2d 118 (1976); United States v. Stone, 472 F.2d 909, 913 (5th Cir.1973), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 1020 , 101 S.Ct. 586 , 66 L.Ed.2d 482 (1980); United States v. Gray, 421 F.2d 316, 317 (5th Cir.1970); see also United States v. Birdsell, 775 F.2d 645, 648 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1119 , 106 S.Ct. 1979 , 90 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodore Duane McKinney
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 825-26 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); United States v. Angelini, 607 F.2d 1305,1308 (9th Cir.1979); United States v. Pomares, 499 F.2d 1220, 1223 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 1032 , 95 S.Ct. 514 , 42 L.Ed.2d 307 (1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Mitchell v. Hopper
See United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 819 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leroy Carlton Knotts and Darryl Petschen
(2×)
See United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190, 1196 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 94 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clark Bailey and Carolyn Gomez
(2×)
See United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190, 1194 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 94 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979); United States v. Miroyan, 577 F.2d 489 , 492 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 439 U.S. 896 , 99 S.Ct. 258 , 58 L.Ed.2d 243 (1978); United States v. Pretzinger, 542 F.2d 517, 520 (9th Cir. 1976); United States v. Hufford, 539 F.2d 32, 34 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1002 , 97 S.Ct. 533 , 50 L.Ed.2d 614 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ex Parte Walker
See, e.g., United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 825 (5th Cir.) ("[The plain-error rule] will not be used to allow counsel for the defendant to gamble first on acquittal and then, upon conviction, to raise on appeal any matters which could have been easily remedied at trial."), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Darrell Keith Kappmeyer v. State
See Angleton , 314 F.3d at 776 (“Collateral estoppel is inapplicable here, because the United States and Texas, as separate sovereigns, are not the ‘same party.’”); See also United States v. Hayes , 589 F.2d 811, 819 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
KAPPMEYER v. State
See Angleton, 314 F.3d at 776 (“Collateral estoppel is inapplicable here, because the United States and Texas, as separate sovereigns, are not the ‘same party.’ ”); See also United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 819 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clark v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 825 (5th Cir.) (`Rule 52(b) will not be used to allow counsel for the defendant to gamble first on acquittal and then, upon conviction, to raise on appeal any matters which could have been easily remedied at trial.'), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lewis v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 825 (5th Cir.) (`Rule 52(b) will not be used to allow counsel for the defendant to gamble first on acquittal and then, upon conviction, to raise on appeal any matters which could have been easily remedied at trial.'), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 825 (5th Cir.) ("Rule 52(b) will not be used to allow counsel for the defendant to gamble first on acquittal and then, upon conviction, to raise on appeal any matters which could have been easily remedied at trial."), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gillis v. State
(2×)
See also United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 817 (5th Cir.) (construing dual sovereignty doctrine broadly and noting the “well-established rule that there is no constitutional bar to successive state and federal prosecutions for the same criminal conduct” (emphasis added)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Proctor
See also United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 822 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); McFadden v. United States, 814 F.2d 144, 146 (3d Cir.1987); United States v. Lovelace, 683 F.2d 248 (7th Cir.1982); Chavez v. United States, 656 F.2d 512 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Caldwell, 543 F.2d 1333, 1349 (D.C.Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 877 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Strayer
The movement of an airplane in the sky, like that of an automobile on a highway is not something in which a. person can claim a reasonable expectation of privacy.’ United States v. Butts, 729 F.2d 1514, 1517 (5th Cir. 1984); see also, United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S. Ct. 94 , 62 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Troy Lee Shearer
See also United States v. Hayes, 589 F.2d 811, 824 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 93 , 62 L.Ed.2d 60 (1979); United States v. Muscarella, 585 F.2d 242, 252 (7th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fabio Alonso
United States v. Butts, 729 F.2d 1514, 1517 (5th Cir.1984); see also, United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 94 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979); Erickson, 732 F.2d at 790 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Santano Coronel-Quintana, A/K/A Santana Coronel-Quintana, United States of America v. Inocencio Coronel
See also United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190, 1197 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 94 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tillman J. Bentley, United States of America v. Nathan Platt
See United States v. Knotts, - U.S. -, ---, 103 S.Ct. 1081, 1086 , 75 L.Ed.2d 55 (1983) (use of beeper to monitor progress of automobile on public highway did not invade any legitimate expectation of privacy); see also, e.g., United States v. Bruneau, 594 F.2d 1190, 1194 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 94 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979) (no expectation of privacy in airborne location of plane).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Luis Carino
See, e.g., United States v. Nevitt, 563 F.2d 406, 408 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 95 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hayes
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-6550.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.