green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.1 score
“ny attorney's fee should be limited to compensation for those services strictly related to the interpleader itself. it should not include attorney's time devoted to limiting the liability of their own client”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Country Casualty Insurance v. Villa-Chavez
ny attorney's fee should be limited to compensation for those services strictly related to the interpleader itself. it should not include attorney's time devoted to limiting the liability of their own client
cited
Cited "see"
Harden v. Raffensperger, Hughes & Co., Inc.
See First Multifund for Daily Income v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 123 , 602 F.2d 332 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1275 , 63 L.Ed.2d 599 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Graystone Nash, Inc.
Indeed, a registration statement is “effective only as to the securities specified therein as proposed to be offered.” 15 U.S.C. § 77f(a); see First Multifund for Daily Income, Inc. v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 123 , 602 F.2d 332 (1979) (registration statement covers only initial offering of securities, not reoffering of those securities after issuer has redeemed them), cert., denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1275 , 63 L.Ed.2d 599 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mayer v. Chesapeake Insurance Company Limited
See Champion Spark Plug Co. v. Gyromat Corp., 603 F.2d 361, 367-68 (2d Cir.1979) (within the province of trier of fact to determine what weight to accord opinion of expert witness), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1276 , 63 L.Ed.2d 600 (1980); see also Philip v. Mayer, Rothkopf Industries, 635 F.2d 1056, 1061 (2d Cir.1980) (appellate court has "limited latitude" to question district court's reliance on expert testimony).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. City of Artesia
See Guyton v. Phillips, 606 F.2d 248, 250 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1276 , 63 L.Ed.2d 600 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Steel Corp. v. United States
See First Multifund For Daily Income, Inc. v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 123, 130-31 , 602 F.2d 332, 337 (1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1275 , 63 L.Ed.2d 599 (1980) (“The form in which an agency manifests its interpretation of a statute it administers is immaterial; the critical thing is whether there is such an interpretation and how settled it has become”.) The action by the ITA terminating the provisional suspension of liquidation is in harmony with Congress’ general intent to make domestic law consistent with GATT, and there is no indication of specific intent to vary …
discussed
Cited "see"
King v. Edwards
See Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. Cinema Adult Theater, 604 F.2d 852 (5th Cir. 1979) cert. denied 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1277 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 ; Bertoglio v. Texas International Company, 488 F.Supp. 630 (D.Del.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Means v. City of Chicago
See Guyton v. Phillips, 606 F.2d 248, 250 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1276 , 63 L.Ed.2d 600 (1980); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee, 637 F.2d 743 (10th Cir. 1980); Whitehurst v. Wright, 592 F.2d 834 (5th Cir. 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Peavey Company v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Peavey Company
See N.L.R.B. v. Wilson Freight Co., 604 F.2d 712, 723 (1st Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 962 , 100 S.Ct. 1277 , 64 L.Ed.2d 238 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
American Refractories Co. v. Combustion Controls
See also Equifax, Inc. v. Luster, 463 F.Supp. 352 (E.D.Ark.1978), aff'd, 604 F.2d 31 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1276 , 63 L.Ed.2d 600 (1980) (applying Arkansas law).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rebecca Judge v. City of Lowell
See, e.g., Guyton v. Phillips, 606 F.2d 248, 250 (9th Cir.1979) ("the Civil Rights Act ... does not provide a cause of action on behalf of a deceased person based upon alleged violation of the deceased’s civil rights which occurred after his death.”), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1276 , 63 L.Ed.2d 600 (1980). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Estate of Conner ex rel. Conner v. Ambrose
See e.g., Guyton v. Phillips, 606 F.2d 248 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1276 , 63 L.Ed.2d 600 (1980); Whitehurst, 592 F.2d 834, 840 ; Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 637 F.2d 743 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 833 , 102 S.Ct. 132 , 70 L.Ed.2d 111 (1981); Culver-Union, 611 N.E.2d 698 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
ESTATE OF CONNER BY CONNER v. Ambrose
See e.g., Guyton v. Phillips, 606 F.2d 248 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1276 , 63 L.Ed.2d 600 (1980); Whitehurst, 592 F.2d 834, 840 ; Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 637 F.2d 743 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 833 , 102 S.Ct. 132 , 70 L.Ed.2d 111 (1981); Culver-Union, 611 N.E.2d 698 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Southwestern Bell Media, Inc. v. Trans Western Publishing, Inc.
See, e.g., Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. Cinema Adult Theater, 604 F.2d 852, 863 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 917 , 100 S.Ct. 1277 , 63 L.Ed.2d 601 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell v. City of Milwaukee
See, e.g., Guyton v. Phillips, 606 F.2d 248, 250 (9th Cir.1979), certiorari denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1276 , 63 L.Ed.2d 600 ; Whitehurst v. Wright, 592 F.2d 834, 840-841 (5th Cir.1979); McQurter v. City of Atlanta, 572 F.Supp. 1401, 1419 (N.D.Ga.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. City of Milwaukee, Howard Johnson and Edwin Shaffer, Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. Thomas Grady, Jr., Patrick Bell, Sr., Etc. v. City of Milwaukee
See, e.g., Guyton v. Phillips, 606 F.2d 248, 250 (9th Cir.1979), certiorari denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1276 , 63 L.Ed.2d 600 ; Whitehurst v. Wright, 592 F.2d 834, 840-841 (5th Cir.1979); McQurter v. City of Atlanta, 572 F.Supp. 1401, 1419 (N.D.Ga.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Julius Goldman's Egg City v. The United States
See also First Multifund for Daily Income, Inc. v. United States, 602 F.2d 332, 336 (Ct.Cl.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 916 , 100 S.Ct. 1275 , 63 L.Ed.2d 599 (1980). *1055 A similar standard has been established for the review of an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations, that is, to sustain an administrative interpretation of a regulation issued by it, it is not necessary to find that the agency construction is the only reasonable one, or even that it is the result a court would have reached had the question arisen in the first instance in judicial proceedings. * * * Where administ…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lumpkin
v.
City of Little Rock
v.
City of Little Rock
No. 79-1085.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.