green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.6 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Shea v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. of New Haven
(2×)
But see Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Assns. v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d, 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S. Ct. 1304 , 63 L.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Allen v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Public Assistance
in our judgment the regulatory control of the bank board over federal savings and loan associations is so pervasive as to leave no room for state regulatory control.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Allen v. STATE, DHSS., PUBLIC ASSISTANCE
(2×)
in our judgment the regulatory control of the bank board over federal savings and loan associations is so pervasive as to leave no room for state regulatory control.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Wamala
“The ability to take one step at a time, to alter the rules for one subset (to see what happens) without changing the rules for everyone, is one of the most important legislative powers protected by the rational-basis standard.” Johnson v. Daley, 339 F.3d 582, 596 (7th Cir. 2003), cert. denied, 541 U.S. 935 (2004); see Estate of Cargill v. City of Rochester, 119 N.H. 661, 668 (1979) (“In enacting a particular statute, . . . the legislature may address itself to only that phase of a problem that appears most acute, even if the net result resembles a crazy quilt more than a carefully balan…
cited
Cited "see"
Trovato v. Deveau
See Estate of Cargill v. City of Rochester, 119 N.H. 661, 667 , 406 A.2d 704, 707 (1979), appeal dismissed, 445 U.S. 921 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School District
See Estate of Cargill v. City of Rochester, 119 N.H. 661, 669 , 406 A.2d 704, 708 (1979), appeal dismissed, 445 U.S. 921 (1980) (statutory limit constitutional, but precariously close to unreasonable).
discussed
Cited "see"
White v. City of Newport
See Estate of Cargill v. City of Rochester, 119 N.H. 661 , 406 A.2d 704 (1979), appeal dismissed, 445 U.S. 921 (1980); Lebohm v. City of Galveston, 154 Tex. 192 , 275 S.W.2d 951 (1955); Troyer v. Department of Health & Social Services, 722 P.2d 158 (Wyo. 1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
1 v. Grievance Committee for the Second & Eleventh Judicial Districts
Immunity conferred pursuant to § 190.40 “not only protects the witness from subsequent use of his testimony, as is required by the Federal Constitution, but also absolves him from all criminal liability, penalty or forfeiture for any ‘transaction ... concerning which he gave evidence.’ ” People v. Rappaport, 47 N.Y.2d 308, 313 , 418 N.Y.S.2d 306, 309 , 391 N.E.2d 1284, 1287 (quoting New York Crim.Proc.Law § 50.10(1)), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 964 , 100 S.Ct. 450 , 62 L.Ed.2d 376 (1979); see Shargel v. Fenton, 459 F.Supp. 700, 704 (S.D.N.Y.1978) (compelled testimony of immunized grand j…
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
(2×)
See Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Ass’ns v. Stein, 9 Cir., 1979, 604 F.2d 1256, 1259 , aff’d mem., 1980, 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (cross claim for injunction); Rath Packing Co. v. Becker, 9 Cir., 1975, 530 F.2d 1295, 1303-1306 , aff’d sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission Of California
(2×)
See Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Ass'ns v. Stein, 9 Cir., 1979, 604 F.2d 1256, 1259 , aff'd mem., 1980, 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (cross claim for injunction); Rath Packing Co. v. Becker, 9 Cir., 1975, 530 F.2d 1295, 1303-1306 , aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alton Box Board Company v. Esprit De Corp.
(2×)
See Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Ass’ns v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
First Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Peterson
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
FIRST FED. S & L ASS'N OF GADSDEN CTY. v. Peterson
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Provience v. Valley Clerks Trust Fund
(2×)
See generally Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Ass’ns. v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir. 1979), aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980); Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 435 U.S. 151 , 98 S.Ct. 988, 994 , 55 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978); Jones v. Rath Packing Co., 430 U.S. 519 , 97 S.Ct. 1305 , 51 L.Ed.2d 604 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lienhard v. State
(2×)
See, e.g., Estate of Cargill v. City of Rochester, 119 N.H. 661, 666-68 , 406 A.2d 704, 706-08 (1979), appeal dismissed, 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980) ($50,-000 tort claim ceiling upheld); Cauley v. City of Jacksonville, 403 So.2d 379, 385-87 (Fla. 1981) ($50,000 per person and $100,000 per incident tort claim ceiling upheld); Wilson v. Gipson, 753 P.2d 1349, 1351-53 (Okla.1988) ($50,000 per person and $300,000 tort claim ceiling upheld, and reviewing cases from other jurisdictions).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State, Department of Banking & Finance ex rel. Lewis v. Standard Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
(2×)
See also, Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1979), affd. 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McAtee v. Mentzer
See, e.g., Vorbeck v. Schnicker, 660 F.2d 1260 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982) [police regulations prescribing conduct “unbecoming to a member of the Department” *52 sustained]; Borlin v. Civil Service Com’n of Council Bluffs, 338 N.W.2d 146 (Iowa 1983) [police regulation prohibiting its officers from undertaking secondary employment upheld]; Trelfa v. Centre Island, 54 App.Div.2d 985, 389 N.Y.S.2d 22 (1976) [prohibition of outside work by policemen held appropriate and essential unless suspended from duty without pay]; Cox v. McNamara,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La Cuesta
(2×)
See, e. g., Conference of Federal Sav. & Loan Assns. v. Stein, 604 F. 2d 1256, 1260 (CA9 1979) (“In our judgment the regulatory control of the Bank Board over federal savings and loan associations is so pervasive as to leave no room for state regulatory control”), summarily aff’d, 445 U. S. 921 (1980); First Federal Sav. & Loan Assn. v. Greenwald, 591F. 2d 417, 425-426 (CA7 1979) (Board regulation specifying the conditions under which federal savings and loans must pay interest on escrow accounts pre-empts state law imposing greater interest requirements); Kupiec v. Republic Federal Sav.…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Otero Savings and Loan Association, a Colorado Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board and Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation
(4×)
See also Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir.), aff’d 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (state agencies have no enforcement power over federal savings and loan associations).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dantus v. FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'N
(2×)
See, e. g., Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980); Meyers v. Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Association, 499 F.2d 1145 (9th Cir. 1974); Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Fox, 459 F.Supp. 903 (C.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dantus v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
(2×)
See, e. g., Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980); Meyers v. Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Association, 499 F.2d 1145 (9th Cir. 1974); Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Fox, 459 F.Supp. 903 (C.D.Cal.1978); Haugen v. Western Federal Savings and Loan Association of Denver, No. 79CV4680 (Colo.Dist.Ct.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smart v. First Federal S & L Ass'n of Detroit
(2×)
See, e. g., Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d. by order, 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980); and First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Boston v. Greenwald, 591 F.2d 417 , 423 n.8 (1st Cir. 1979) (questioning removal jurisdiction but finding, in a cursory footnote, that the court had declaratory judgment jurisdiction).
Conrad
v.
Greene, U. S. District Judge
v.
Greene, U. S. District Judge
No. 79-6075.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 17, 1980.
Cited by 67 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Alaska Supreme Court (3)
Appeal from D. C. D. C. dismissed for want of jurisdiction.