green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Craig v. State
See Luck v. State, 588 S.W.2d 371 (Tex.Crim.App.1979), cert denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S.Ct. 2171 , 64 L.Ed.2d 799 (1980); Albritton v. State, 662 S.W.2d 377 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1983, PDRR).
discussed
Cited "see"
Liveoak v. State
(2×)
See Luck v. State, 588 S.W.2d 371, 375 (Tex.Crim.App.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S.Ct. 2171 , 64 L.Ed.2d 799 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kent Steven Allain
See United States v. Walker, 613 F.2d 1349, 1353 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S.Ct. 2172 , 64 L.Ed.2d 800 (1980) (“Cross-examination with respect to part of the transaction enables the opposing party to elicit evidence on re-direct examination of the whole transaction . ...” 1 See also United States v. Mackey, 571 F.2d 376 , 383 n.9 (7th Cir. 1978) (“The general rule is that the scope of redirect examination is a matter firmly committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.”).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Seymour Joseph Cassel
See Jacobs v. Redman, 616 F.2d 1251, 1255-1256 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S.Ct. 2170 , 64 L.Ed.2d 799 (1980) (No reversible error in district court’s voir dire.).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Dumas
See U. S. v. Walker, 613 F.2d 1349, 1352-53 , 1353 n. 5 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S.Ct. 2172 , 64 L.Ed.2d 800 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Paul A. Zeigler v. William T. Callahan
See Cheek v. Bates, 615 F.2d 559, 562 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S.Ct. 2172 , 64 L.Ed.2d 800 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rene Galvan-Garcia
See also United States v. Walker, 613 F.2d 1349, 1352-53 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S.Ct. 2172 , 64 L.Ed.2d 800 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Barry K. Urian, Sr.
See United States v. Poole, 450 F.2d 1082, 1083-84 (3d Cir.1971) (refusal to ask jurors requested question “Have you or any member of your family ever been the victim of a robbery or other crime?” was error entitling defendant to new trial); see also Jacobs v. Redman, 616 F.2d 1251, 1256-57 (3d Cir.) (noting that Poole was predicated upon supervisory powers of the federal court, not a federal constitutional right, and did not apply to state conviction before court on petition for habeas corpus), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 100 S.Ct. 2170 , 64 L.Ed.2d 799 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eddie Chisem
Compare, United States v. Walker, 613 F.2d 1349 , 1355 n.12 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 944 , 955, 100 S.Ct. 2172 , 2925, 64 L.Ed.2d 800 , 813 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clark
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 79-6288.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 12, 1980.
Published
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.