green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.4 score
“e must examine the transaction through the eyes of the consumer.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Fairley v. Turan-Foley Imports, Inc.
e must examine the transaction through the eyes of the consumer.
discussed
Cited "see"
Juanita B. Fairley v. Turan-Foley Imports, Inc., D/B/A Turan-Foley Mitsubishi
See Cody v. Community Loan Corp., 606 F.2d 499, 505 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2973 , 64 L.Ed.2d 846 (1980) ("[W]e must examine the transaction through the eyes of the consumer.”). 3 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Otey
See State v. Otey, 205 Neb. 90 , 287 N.W.2d 36 (1979), cert. denied 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S. Ct. 2974 , 64 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harry Hoffman Printing, Inc. v. Graphic Communications International Union, Local 261
See Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Local 27, United Paperworkers Int'l Union, 864 F.2d 940, 946 (1st Cir.1988) ("To allow the arbitrator to ignore ... explicit language ... by substituting 'his own brand of industrial justice' for that agreed to by the parties" would "do violence" to the no modification clause). 19 The Union cites Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 878 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 613 F.2d 716 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2975 , 64 L.Ed.2d 847 (1980), which held that an arbitral decision based on procedural due process was "drawn from the essence" of the c…
cited
Cited "see"
McKenzie v. State
See O’Bryan v. State, 591 S.W.2d 464 (Tex.Crim.App.1979), cert den’d, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2975 , 64 L.Ed.2d 846 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Jones v. Kemp
Accord, Burger v. State, 245 Ga. 458, 461 , 265 S.E.2d 796, 799 , cert. denied, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2975 , 64 L.Ed.2d 847 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. State
(2×)
See O'Bryan v. State, 591 S.W.2d 464, 478 (Tex.Cr.App. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2975 , 64 L.Ed.2d 846 (1980); Sanne v. State, 609 S.W.2d 762 (Tex.Cr.App.1980), cert. denied sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
McClinton v. State
See O’Bryan v. State, 591 S.W.2d 464, 477 (Tex.Cr.App.1979), ce rt. denied, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2975 , 64 L.Ed.2d 846 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Anaconda Company, Aluminum Division v. District Lodge No. 27 of the International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio
See Chauffeurs Teamsters and Helpers, Local Union No. 878 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 613 F.2d 716 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2975 , 64 L.Ed.2d 847 (1980) (arbitrator ordered reinstatement because lack of procedural fairness precluded finding of “just cause” for discharge).
cited
Cited "see"
Jimmy Lee Gray v. Eddie Lucas, Warden
See Gray v. State, 375 So.2d 994 (Miss.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2975 , 64 L.Ed.2d 847 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Lewis Washington v. John C. Watkins, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
(2×)
See Gray v. State, 375 So.2d 994, 1003-04 (Miss.1979) (en banc) (approving instruction that jury was to consider as a mitigating circumstance "(a)ny other matter (besides the statutory mitigating circumstances) brought before you which you deem to be mitigating on behalf of the Defendant"), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2975 , 64 L.Ed.2d 847 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jeanette White and Johnny Tinsley, Cross-Appellants v. World Finance of Meridian, Inc., Cross-Appellee
See Cody v. Community Loan Corp. of Richmond County, 606 F.2d 499, 508 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2973 , 64 L.Ed.2d 846 (1980), citing Davis v. United Companies Mortgage and Investment of Grentna, Inc., 551 F.2d 971, 972 (5th Cir. 1977) (two statutory penalties allowed when there are two borrowers who are jointly and severally liable for the note).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Moore
See, e.g., State v. Otey, 205 Neb. 90 , 287 N.W.2d 36 (1979), cert. denied 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S. Ct. 2974 , 64 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph Bennard Nichols v. Wayne Scott, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Cross-Appellee
As a matter of Texas law, the prosecutor may comment on “the defendant’s failure to call a material witness, and he may draw an inference from that failure that the testimony would have been unfavorable.” O’Bryan v. Estelle, 714 F.2d 365, 388 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1013 , 104 S.Ct. 1015 , 79 L.Ed.2d 245 (1984); see also O’Bryan v. State, 591 S.W.2d 464, 479 (Tex.Crim.App.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2975 , 64 L.Ed.2d 846 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Reynolds v. State
See e.g., O’Bryan v. State, 591 S.W.2d 464, 479 (Tex.Crim.App.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S.Ct. 2975 , 64 L.Ed.2d 846 (1979); Carrillo v. State, 566 S.W.2d 902, 912 (Tex.Crim.App.1978); Parker v. State, 792 S.W.2d 795, 801-02 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1990, pet. ref’d).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ellis
See, also, State v. Otey, 205 Neb. 90 , 287 N.W.2d 36 (1979), cert. denied 446 U.S. 988 , 100 S. Ct. 2974 , 64 L.
Jones
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-6588.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 2, 1980.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.