green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
El Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. Rexach Benítez
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272 , 1281 & n.4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed. 2d 856 (1980) ....
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael David Winter, and Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance Co., Intervenor-Appellant v. Brenner Tank, Inc. And Bar-Bel Fabricating Co., Inc.
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1281 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, Bella v. United States, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980); see also Dixon 754 F.2d at 585-86 (“To justify a reversal based on improper comments of counsel, the conduct must be such as to gravely impair the calm and dispassionate consideration of the case by the jury.”) Though the questions propounded by the defense counsel were certainly improper, we cannot hold that they so permeated the proceedings such as to deny Winter’s right to a fair trial.
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. State
See Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754, 756 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980) (overwhelming evidence of guilt); Ostos, 713 S.W.2d at 403 (comments cured by instruction to disregard); Todd v. State, 598 S.W.2d 286, 294 (Tex.Crim.App.1980) (comments cured by instructions to disregard); compare Menzies, 743 F.2d at 289 (evidence of guilt not overwhelming and no correction of possible mistaken impressions).
cited
Cited "see"
Steven Garofolo v. Philip Coomb, Superintendent, Eastern New York Correctional Facility
See Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754, 756 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
Frederick Kirkpatrick, Etc. v. Frank Blackburn, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondents
See Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754 , 755 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980) (instances of prosecutorial argument are not to be viewed in isolation). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel De Jesus Cardenas
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1282 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Alan Louis Chavis and Lambert Daniel Slisz
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1277-78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John R. Swaim
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1278 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wendell Cole, Howard Masters, B.K. Taylor, Larry Masters, Defendants
See United States v. Nickerson, 669 F.2d 1016, 1020 (5th Cir. Unit B 1982) (citing United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Francis P. Tracey v. United States
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272 , 1281 & n. 4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980); United States v. Union Nacional de Trabajadores, 576 F.2d 388, 395 (1st Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Yermian
(2×)
Accord, United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F. 2d 1272 (CA5), cert. denied, 447 U. S. 907 (1980). [13] The dissent suggests that when Congress eliminated the phrase "with intent to defraud the United States," it really meant only to eliminate the word "defraud," but to retain the element of intent with respect to the United States.
cited
Cited "see"
United States ex rel. Shaw v. DeRobertis
See Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754, 755-56 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Darryl Brooks
See United States v. Downs, 615 F.2d 677, 679 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
27 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1352, 28 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 32,413 Placido Rivera, Richard Gonzales, Intervenors-Appellants v. The City of Wichita Falls
See Eubanks v. Pickens-Bond Construction Co., 635 F.2d 1341, 1347 (8th Cir. 1980); accord Hamilton v. General Motors Corp., 606 F.2d 576, 580 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent Martino, John Torrioni, Policardo Despaigne, A/K/A \Paulie
(2×)
See United States v. Vasquez, 612 F.2d 1338, 1348 (2d Cir. 1979) (Oakes, J., dissenting) (airport search), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980); United States v. Barbera, 514 F.2d 294 (2d Cir. 1975) (border search).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Dumas
See Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754, 755 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pedro Saade, United States of America v. Carlos Zenon Rodriguez
(2×)
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272 , 1281 & n.4 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980); United States v. Union Nacional de Trabajadores, 576 F.2d 388, 395 (1st Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Penalo
See United States v. Vasquez, 612 F.2d 1338, 1342 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980); United States v. Oates, 560 F.2d 45, 61 (2d Cir. 1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Bottom, Dave Davis and Elam Bracy Hamilton
See United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1279 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank E. Basil, Inc. v. Guardino
Purposefulness, in turn, depends upon two factors: (1) whether the defendant “anticipated that [it] would derive any economic benefits as a result of the contract,” Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior Court, supra, and (2) whether it “assumed any obligations to [the plaintiff] which he might have sought to enforce in California.” Id.; see United California Bank v. First Bank of Oak Park, 98 Cal.App.3d 439 , 159 Cal.Rptr. 607 (1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980) (Sibley two part “purposefulness” test applied).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
International Telecommunications Exchange Corp. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.
See, e.g., Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Terry Tuck, Inc., 612 F.2d 465, 466 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Waldrop v. Thigpen
See Brooks v. Kemp; see also Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Clark
See also, United States v. Vasquez, 612 F.2d 1338, 1345 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980) (a maximal intrusion, even if technically short of an arrest, must be based on probable cause).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milne Truck Lines, Inc. v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.
Co., 260 U.S. 156, 163 , 43 S.Ct. 47, 49 , 67 L.Ed. 183 (1922)); see also Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Terry Tuck, Inc., 612 F.2d 465, 466 (9th Cir.) ("[N]o claim for relief can be predicated on a carrier's alleged fraudulent misquotation of tariffs."), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Milne Truck Lines, Inc. v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.
Co., 260 U.S. 156, 163 , 43 S.Ct. 47, 49 , 67 L.Ed. 183 (1922)); see also Consolidated Freightways Corp. v. Terry Tuck, Inc., 612 F.2d 465, 466 (9th Cir.) (“[N]o claim for relief can be predicated on a carrier’s alleged fraudulent misquotation of tariffs.”), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings. Appeal of Jason David Meadows
See United States v. Stevens, 510 F.2d 1101, 1104, 1106 (5th Cir.1975) (government attorney’s unsworn, goodfaith affidavit stating that no questions were based on electronic surveillance held adequate response to general and unsubstantiated claim of surveillance); see also In re Grand Jury Proceedings (Brummit), 613 F.2d 62, 65 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert A. Greenwood
What makes a statement material is that it is required to put the claimant in a position to receive government benefits, whether rightfully or wrongfully.” United States v. Adler, 623 F.2d 1287, 1291 (8th Cir.1980); see also United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272, 1278-79 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Anglin v. Green
See, e.g., Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754 (5th Cir.) (given the strength of evidence against the defendant, the prosecutor’s inflammatory argument did not render trial fundamentally unfair), cert, denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980); Cronnon v. Alabama, 587 F.2d 246 (5th Cir.) (improper argument not unconstitutional due to overwhelming evidence of guilt), cert, denied, 440 U.S. 974 , 99 S.Ct. 1542 , 59 L.Ed.2d 792 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Paulson v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Aero Trucking, Inc., 594 F.2d at 621-22 ; see also Consolidated Freightways v. Terry Tuck, Inc., 612 F.2d 465 , 466 (9th Cir.) (per curiam) (shipper has no claim for relief based on carrier’s fraudulent misquotation of tariffs), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
High v. Kemp
See, e.g., Cobb v. Wainwrigkt, 609 F.2d 754 (5th Cir.) (given the strength of evidence against the defendant, the prosecutor’s inflammatory argument did not render trial fundamentally unfair), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980); Cronnon v. Alabama, 587 F.2d 246 (5th Cir.) (improper argument not unconstitutional due to overwhelming evidence of guilt), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 974 , 99 S.Ct. 1542 , 59 L.Ed.2d 792 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Anthony Brooks v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent
(2×)
See, e.g., Cobb v. Wainwright, 609 F.2d 754 (5th Cir.) (given the strength of evidence against the defendant, the prosecutor’s inflammatory argument did not render trial fundamentally unfair), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 857 (1980); Cronnon v. Alabama, 587 F.2d 246 (5th Cir.) (improper argument not unconstitutional due to overwhelming evidence of guilt), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 974 , 99 S.Ct. 1542 , 59 L.Ed.2d 792 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wicks v. Lockhart
See, e.g., United States v. Lichenstein, 610 F.2d 1272 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2991 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Missouri Pacific Railroad Company v. Rutledge Oil Company
See, e.g., Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware v. Terry Tuck, Inc., 612 F.2d 465 (9th Cir.) (dismissing counterclaim for fraud predicated on misquotation of tariffs), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 2990 , 64 L.Ed.2d 856 (1980); Aero Trucking, Inc. v. Regal Tube Co., 594 F.2d 619 (7th Cir. 1979) (estoppel unavailable for reasonable reliance on fraudulent understatement of charges); Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 501 F.2d 1400 (7th Cir. 1974) (shipper unwittingly designating more expensive route cannot later assert estoppel defense).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
First Bank of Oak Park
v.
United California Bank
v.
United California Bank
No. 79-1669.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 9, 1980.
Published
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.