green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1983 ·
…hall was available for effective cross-examination concerning the veracity of his extrajudicial statement
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Howard Brown and Alexander Bishop
(2×)
hall was available for effective cross-examination concerning the veracity of his extrajudicial statement
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gallego
See Rado v. Connecticut, 607 F.2d 572, 581 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Neftali Perez v. Everett Jones, Superintendent, Great Meadow Correctional Facility, and Robert Abrams, Attorney General of the State of New York
See Rado v. Connecticut, 607 F.2d 572, 581 (2d Cir.1979) (citing Namet v. United States, 373 U.S. 179 , 83 S.Ct. 1151 , 10 L.Ed.2d 278 (1963)), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980); see also United States v. Casamento, 887 F.2d 1141, 1186 (2d Cir.1989), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 110 S.Ct. 1138 , 107 L.Ed.2d 1043 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Moosman
See generally Rado v. State of Connecticut, 607 F.2d 572 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980). 24 . 806 F.2d 39 (2d Cir.1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1020 , 107 S.Ct. 1903 , 95 L.Ed.2d 509 (1989). 25 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Washita Construction Company, and Billy Ray Anthony
See United States v. Azzarelli Construction Co., 612 F.2d 292 (7th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3010 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980); United States v. Rodgers, 624 F.2d 1303 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 917 , 101 S.Ct. 1360 , 67 L.Ed.2d 342 (1981); United States v. Climatemp, Inc., 482 F.Supp. 376 (N.D.Ill.1979), aff'd, United States v. Reliable Sheet Metal Works, Inc., 705 F.2d 461 (7th Cir.1983); United States v. Brighton Building & Maintenance Company, 435 F.Supp. 222 (N.D.Ill.1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. McKinnon Bridge Co., Inc.
See United States v. Azzarelli Construction Co., 612 F.2d 292, 298 (7th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3010 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Lyon v. TEMPLE UNIV. OF COM. SYSTEM OF HIGHER ED.
Accord, Northwest Airlines v. Transport Workers Union of America, 606 F.2d 1350 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. granted, 445 U.S. 902 , 100 S.Ct. 3008 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1111 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Lyon v. Temple University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education
Accord, Northwest Airlines v. Transport Workers Union of America, 606 F.2d 1350 (D.C.Cir.1979), cert. granted, 445 U.S. 902, 100 S.Ct. 3008 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1111 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Vuyanich v. Republic Nat. Bank of Dallas
See Burdine v. Texas Dept. of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563 , 569 n.14 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. granted, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S. Ct. 3009 , 65 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arnold v. United States
(2×)
See McBride v. State, 477 A.2d 174, 187 (Del.1984) ("the State has a right to call a witness to the stand to testify as to relevant matters of which he has knowledge" (citations omitted)); see also Rado v. Connecticut, 607 F.2d 572, 581 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980); United States v. Mayes, 512 F.2d 637, 649 (6th Cir.) ("the government has the obligation to present such relevant testimony as the witness may possess"), cert. denied, 422 U.S. 1008 , 95 S.Ct. 2629 , 45 L.Ed.2d 670 (1975). [17] This case is not comparable to those in which cour…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Washington v. Kroger Co.
See, e. g., Burdine v. Texas Department of Community Affairs, 608 F.2d 563 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. granted, 447 U.S. 920 , 100 S.Ct. 3009 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1980); East v. Romine, Inc., 518 F.2d 332 (5th Cir. 1975).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Northwest Airlines, Inc.
v.
Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO
v.
Transport Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO
No. 79-1056.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1980.
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United States for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Certiorari granted and case set for oral argument in tandem with No. 79-972, Westvaco Corp. et al. v. Adams Extract Co. et al., immediately supra.
Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of the motion and petition.