green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
9.7 score
“finding derive abundant support from the record . . . cannot be set aside on clear-error review”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Lopez Polanco
finding derive abundant support from the record . . . cannot be set aside on clear-error review
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lazcano-Villalobos
See id. at 1486 (relying on United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1076 (4th Cir.1980) (holding inference of driver’s knowledge existed when truck-camper contained over 1,100 pounds of marijuana), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980)). 6 .Mr.
discussed
Cited "see"
Troy Eugene Braxton v. Commonwealth
See White v. Commonwealth, 24 Va. App. 234, 240 , 481 S.E.2d 486, 489 (1997) (citing United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1072 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980)). - 6 - Commonwealth, 6 Va. App. 172, 176 , 366 S.E.2d 719, 721 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul Jay Rosenbluth
See United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1241-42 (9th Cir.) (finding certification of absence of tax returns admissible under Rule 803(10)), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980). 13 Finally, admission of Fox's declaration did not violate Rosenbluth's Confrontation Clause rights.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hector Luis Colon, A/K/A Warren, A/K/A Mike, A/K/A Juan
See United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1075 (4th Cir.) (noting knowledge and participation as requisite elements of conspiracy), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980). 3 In accordance with the requirements of Anders, supra, we have examined the entire record in this case and find no other meritorious issues for appeal.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Naomi Rodriguez
See Stanley v. Wainwright, 604 F.2d 379, 382 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Edward Feury
See United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1074 (4th Cir. 1980) (existence of a conspiracy may be inferred from "circumstances indicating that two or more persons acted in concert to achieve an illegal goal"), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Emilio Bravo, AKA Tito, Alexander Olivo-Gonzalez and Ernesto Cruz
See United States v. Panza, 612 F.2d 432, 437 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jody Bernard Shaffer
See United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1242 (9th Cir.) (failure to use the word "diligent" was insufficient to defeat the applicability of Fed.R.Evid. § 803(10)), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980); United States v. Lee, 589 F.2d 980 , 987 n. 7 (9th Cir.) (failure to use the word "diligent" was insufficient to justify exclusion of affidavits), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 969 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Merrill E. Fields v. Attorney General of the State of Maryland Kenneth E. Taylor, Warden
See Stanley v. Wainwright, 604 F.2d 379 , 380 n. 1 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3019 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1980) (Lefkow-itz applied where Florida courts permitted post- *1296 plea challenges to the constitutionality of confessions); Canary v. Bland, 583 F.2d 887, 890 (6th Cir.1978) (although no state statute applied post-plea federal habeas review of prior juvenile transfer proceedings available where Kentucky courts consistently permitted appeals to challenge the validity of such proceedings). 15 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Ephraim J. Swann v. United States
See United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1241 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980). 13 Here, the IRS submitted the Certificates to show that Swann received notice of his tax liability and that the IRS properly assessed his property.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jorge Efrin Medina
See United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1075 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Delgado
See United States v. Panza, 612 F.2d 432, 437 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3019 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1980) and sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James D. Franzen
See United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1075 (4 Cir.), cert denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980). "[O]ne who authorizes, orders, or helps perpetrate the crime" has taken an action sufficient to make him a participant in a price-fixing conspiracy.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ryan
See United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1076 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980). 11 The final argument in appellants' brief, made on behalf of Stivers, barely merits comment.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ira Eugene Borchardt
See Stanley v. Wainwright, 604 F.2d 379, 382 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3019 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1979) (Miranda does not protect de tainees who mistakenly believe their conversations will not be overheard by officials nor does it forbid police, under fifth amendment sanction, from setting snares.).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Brown
See United States v. Panza, 612 F.2d 432, 437 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3019 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Francis William Hewes, Ii, Gene M. Simpson, Millard Clifford Haley, Walter Langford, and Howard E. Caldwell
See United States v. Habel, 613 F.2d 1321, 1325 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Collazo
See United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1076-77 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980); United States v. Stephenson, 474 F.2d 1353, 1355 (5 Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1984
See United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1076-77 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980); United States v. Stephenson, 474 F.2d 1353, 1355 (5 Cir.1973). 22 As we must, we have reviewed the evidence at trial in the light most favorable to the government.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Simontov Yakobov, A/K/A \Yakov Yakubov
United States v. Harris, supra, 551 F.2d at 622 ; accord United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235 , 1241-42 & n. 7 (9th Cir.) (computerized IRS records to show absence of tax returns), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980); United States v. Cepeda Penes, 577 F.2d 754, 761 (1st Cir.1978) (same).
cited
Cited "see"
Layton v. State
See United States v. Panza, 612 F.2d 432, 438 (9th Cir. 1979) cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Grabinski
See United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1238 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Commissioner
See United States v. Neff, 615 F. 2d 1235 (9th Cir. 1980) , cert. denied 447 U.S. 925 (1980) ; United States v. Smith, 618 F. 2d 280 (5th Cir. 1980) ; United States v. Daly, 481 F. 2d 28 (8th Cir. 1973) , cert. denied 414 U.S. 1064 (1973) ; United States v. Porth, 426 F. 2d 519 (10 Cir. 1970), cert denied 400 U.S. 824 (1970) ; Cupp v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 68 , 79 , 84 (1975) , affd. 559 F. 2d 1207 (3d Cir. 1977) ; Jarvis v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 646 , 653-655 (1982) ; and Reiff v. Commissioner, 77 T.C. 1169 , 1177 (1981) . *730 Petitioner testified that he had read court opinions and other ma…
discussed
Cited "see"
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Joseph, Shelly
(2×)
See United States v. Gross, 614 F.2d 365 (3d Cir.) (per curiam) (implying that evidence of an improper influence on the jury constituted “newly discovered evidence”), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3019 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1980); 8A J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Blue Sky L. Rep. P 71,752 United States of America v. David Israel Namer
(2×)
See United States v. Farese, 612 F.2d 1376, 1377 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3019 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Osborne
See United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980); United States v. Masiello, 491 F.Supp. 1154 (D.S.C.1980); People v. Edwards, 74 Ill.App.2d 225 , 219 N.E.2d 382 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Stewart
See United States v. Gross, 614 F.2d 365, 368 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980); Friendly, Is Innocence Irrelevant?
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Seni
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1076 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca4 1981
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067, 1076 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Larry Brown
Based on the fact that “[pjersons who work in banks have good reason to fear bank robbery because violence, or the threat of violence, is a frequent concomitant of the offense,” Judge Hufstedler’s opinion in Allsup held that “[t]he employment relationship coupled with a reasonable apprehension of violence by bank robbers leads us to believe that bias of those who work for the bank robbed should be presumed.” Id. at 71-72 ; see United States v. Panza, 612 F.2d 432, 441 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3019 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Louis Evans, III v. Robert G. Britton, Commissioner, Alabama Board of Corrections, and Joseph Oliver, Warden, Holman Prison
United States v. Boniface, 631 F.2d 1228, 1229 (5th Cir. 1980); accord, Stanley v. Wainwright, 604 F.2d 379 , 380 n. 1 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3019 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnston v. Love
See also Stanley v. Wainwright, 604 F.2d 379, 381 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3019 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1980) (same). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Beltran
See United States v. Ruster, 712 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir.1983); see also United States v. Panza, 612 F.2d 432, 436-37 (9th Cir.1979) (trial court has broad discretion to determine the bounds of relevant cross-examination), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Tarrant
See e.g., United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1241-1242 (9th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Salvatore Spine, Jr.
(2×)
See also United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1242 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980). 23 Spine's final argument, that the government failed to prove the essential elements of tax evasion, is disposed of quickly.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brewer v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1241 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980); Schmidt v. IRS, 717 F.Supp. 763, 764 (D.Kan.1989) (“Form 4340, Certificate of Assessments and Payments_[is] proper and admissible evidence pursuant to Rules 902(1) and 803(8) of the Federal Rules of Evidence”), vacated on other grounds, 913 F.2d 837 (10th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Richard Plache James Attarian
The issue as consistently framed under our case law, is whether “this case presents] a relationship in which the ‘potential for substantial emotional involvement, adversely affecting impartiality,’ is inherent?” Tinsley, 895 F.2d at 527 (quoting Eubanks, 591 F.2d at 517 ; Allsup, 566 F.2d at 71 ); see also United States v. Panza, 612 F.2d 432, 441 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3019 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cosa Thomas
Id.; see also, United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 (1980). 11 Viewing all the evidence in a light most favorable to the government, this Court must assume that appellant identified herself as the fictitious addressee of the package, as indicated by Officer Brown.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gaines
See also United States v. Panza, 612 F.2d 432, 440 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3019 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1118 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Smith
(2×)
See Annot. 56 A.L.R.Fed. 168 § 5 (1982), United States v. Cambindo Valencia, 609 F.2d 603 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 940 , 100 S.Ct. 2163 , 64 L.Ed.2d 795 (1980); United States v. Grady, 544 F.2d 598 (2d Cir.1976); see also United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Walls
See also U.S. v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067 (4th Cir.1980) cert. denied 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Commissioner
See also, Martindale v. Commissioner, 692 F.2d 764 (9th Cir. 1982) , affg. without published opinion an unreported order and decision of this Court, United States v. Carlson, 617 F.2d 518 , 523 (9th Cir. 1980) , cert. denied 449 U.S. 1010 (1980) , and United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235 , 1238 (9th Cir. 1980) , cert. denied 447 U.S. 925 ↩ (1980) . 14.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas E. Verkuilen
See also United States v. Neff, 615 F.2d 1235, 1240 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980); United States v. Carlson, 617 F.2d 518, 523 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 1010 , 101 S.Ct. 564 , 66 L.Ed.2d 468 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert D. Blair v. United States of America, Charles L. Moore v. United States of America, William G. Dodds, Jr. v. United States
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Laughman, 618 F.2d 1067 , 1072 n.2 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 3018 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1117 (1980) (dictim); United States v. Tilton, 534 F.2d 1363 (9th Cir. 1976).
Fels
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-1780.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1980.
Published
Citer courts: First Circuit (1)
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.