green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.5 score
“henceforth, the district courts, in any denial of a double jeopardy motion, should make written findings determining whether the motion is frivolous or nonfrivolous ...”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Death Row Prisoners v. Ridge
henceforth, the district courts, in any denial of a double jeopardy motion, should make written findings determining whether the motion is frivolous or nonfrivolous ...
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Robert Gutstein
reckless disregard for truth or falsity is sufficient to sustain a finding of securities fraud
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Kalil
See State v. Baldwin, supra, 355 (fact that other misconduct evi- dence ‘‘was remarkably similar both in kind and loca- tion’’ to evidence of charged crime made other mis- conduct evidence ‘‘that much more probative’’), citing United States v. Jones, 913 F.2d 1552, 1566 (11th Cir. 1990), and United States v. Dunbar, 614 F.2d 39, 42 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S. Ct. 3022 , 65 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert Arthur Gutstein, Aka: Robert A. Gutstein, Aka: Robert Gutstein v. United States
See United States v. Farris, 614 F.2d 634, 638 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, Baumann v. United States, 447 U.S. 926 (1980) 2 Because Gutstein's "motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief," 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , Gutstein was also not entitled to an evidentiary hearing, and the district court did not abuse its discretion in not holding one
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilson
See Wong Sun, 371 U.S. at 488 , 83 S.Ct. at 417 . 44 In order for the causal chain between the illegal seizure of the checkbook and Wilson's statement to Inspector McDermott to be broken, the statement must have been voluntary, and "sufficiently an act of the free will to purge the primary taint." United States v. Parker, 722 F.2d 179, 186 (5th Cir.1983), overruled on other grounds, United States v. Hurtado, 905 F.2d 74 (5th Cir.1990), citing Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 601 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2261 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) and United States v. Miller, 608 F.2d 1089, 1102 (5th Cir.1979), cert.…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter Esposito
See United States v. Dunbar, 591 F.2d 1190, 1192 (5th Cir.1979) (“no court in this country has ever held that a defendant may not be indicted and tried once for a conspiracy and thereafter tried for the crime of distributing controlled substances”), panel opinion adopted in relevant part, 611 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trimboli v. MacLean
(2×)
See United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985, 989 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); and see Com. v. Brady, 508 A.2d 286, 291 (Pa.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Lewis, on Behalf of Nat. Semiconductor v. Sporck
See generally United States v. Farris, 614 F.2d 634, 639 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); see also Beecroft, 608 F.2d at 759 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lester Rogers, United States of America v. Lester Rogers
See United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985, 988 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Lowell Stratton, Steven Parness, Leonard Parness, and Bernard Farbar
See United States v. Garris, 616 F.2d 626, 631 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3021 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1980). 8 .
cited
Cited "see"
Federal Trade Commission v. Kitco of Nevada, Inc.
See United States v. Baumann, 614 F.2d 634 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); FTC v. International Diamond Corp., 1983-82 Trade Cas.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Black
See United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985, 987 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melvin Dick and Anthony Giacomino
See United States v. Farris, 614 F.2d 634, 638 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); United States v. Frick, 588 F.2d 531, 536 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 2013 , 60 L.Ed.2d 385 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony T. Mulherin, Jr., Harvey E. Hornsby, Robert A. Holliday, Henry Mulherin, Elizabeth Moore
See U.S. v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980). a.
discussed
Cited "see"
Wright v. Schock
See United States v. Farris, 614 F.2d 634 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange v. SEC, 285 F.2d 162 (9th Cir.1960); Lingenfelter v. Title Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Concepcion Rubio, A/K/A \Carol Rubio
See United States v. Garris, 616 F.2d 626, 630 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3021 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Boyer
See United States v. Farris, 614 F.2d 634 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); United States v. Themy, 624 F.2d 963, 965 (10th Cir.1980); United States v. Henderson, 446 F.2d 960, 966 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 991 , 92 S.Ct. 536 , 30 L.Ed.2d 543 (1971); United States v. Frick, 588 F.2d 531, 536 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 913 , 99 S.Ct. 2013 , 60 L.Ed.2d 385 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Carla Florentine Hines, Leroy Dale Hines, Anna Mae Hines, Defendants
See United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985, 987-88 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 .
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis M. MAYO, Jr., and James Harold Dondich, Defendants-Appellants
See United States v. Farris, 614 F.2d 634, 638-39 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 101 S.Ct. 920 , 66 L.Ed.2d 839 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ray L. Corona and Rafael L. Corona
See also United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); United States v. Cerilli, 558 F.2d 697 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 966 , 98 S.Ct. 507 , 54 L.Ed.2d 452 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Billy Joe Nichols
See also, United States v. Dunbar, 591 F.2d 1190 (5th Cir. 1979), panel opinion adopted in relevant part and remanded, 611 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.) (en banc), cert, denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. State
See, e.g., United States v. Miller, 608 F.2d 1089 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3020 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1981); United States v. Prichard, 645 F.2d 854 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 832 , 102 S.Ct. 130 , 70 L.Ed.2d 110 (1981); Peoples v. Carlson, 677 P.2d 310 (Col. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Schock
(2×)
We find that the economic welfare of the purchasers is inextricably woven with the ability of LATD to locate by the exercise of its independent judgment a sufficient number of discounted trust deeds, and the ability of LATD to subsequently meet its commitments, to check, evaluate, supervise, and supersede.” (Id., 285 F.2d at p. 172; see also Securities and Exchange Com’n v. Lake Havasu Estates (D.Minn. 1972) 340 F.Supp. 1318, 1321-1322 [defendant’s screening and protection of investments in land sales contracts determined as securities].) Similarly, in United States v. Farris (9th Cir. 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Woodrow Vernell Clemons, A/K/A \Sundown\""
U.S. v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 911 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979); U.S. v. Jimenez, 613 F.2d 1373, 1376 (5th Cir. 1980); see also U.S. v. Dunbar, 614 F.2d 39, 42 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980); U.S. v. Kloock, III, 652 F.2d 492 , (5th Cir. 1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John C. Gryar v. Odeco Drilling, Inc. v. Otto Candies, Inc., and Highlands Insurance Company, Third Party
See id. at 694 ; see also United States v. Dunbar, 611 F.2d 985 (5th Cir.) (en banc) (despite appeal from denial of double jeopardy motion, the district court is not divested of jurisdiction when the trial judge finds that the motion is “frivolous”), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3022 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1120 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Winley
See also United States v. Garris, 616 F.2d 626 , 631—33 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 926 , 100 S.Ct. 3021 , 65 L.Ed.2d 1119 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tates
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 79-6220.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 16, 1980.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (1) · E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.