green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.1 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 2 distinct cases ·
“Summary judgment is strongly disfavored prior to the parties having had an adequate opportunity for discovery”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“any question of a judge’s impartiality threatens the purity of the judicial process and its institutions.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“It was unnecessary for AMFI to outline any or all of the possible dangers that could be posed by a decrease in statutory capital and surplus; the disclosure that they would be decreased was adequate.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“The amendment of 28 U.S.C. § 455 did not alter the standard of appellate review on disqualification issues____”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 47 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Patton v. General Signal Corp.
summary judgment is strongly disfavored prior to the parties having had an adequate opportunity for discovery
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brogren v. Pohlad
it was unnecessary for amfi to outline any or all of the possible dangers that could be posed by a decrease in statutory capital and surplus; the disclosure that they would be decreased was adequate.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Garrudo
any question of a judge's impartiality threatens the purity of the judicial process and its institutions.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Duke v. Pfizer, Inc., Div. of Pfizer Hosp.
the amendment of 28 u.s.c. 455 did not alter the standard of appellate review on disqualification issues____
discussed
Cited "see"
ABRAHAM v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
See Potashnick v. Port City Const. Co., 609 F.2d 1101, 1113 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 (1980) (finding that “actual participation” is required to find that a person is “acting as a lawyer in the proceeding” under § 455(b)(5)(ii)); see also U.S. ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
ABRAHAM v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY
See Potashnick v. Port City Const. Co., 609 F.2d 1101, 1113 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 (1980) (finding that “actual participation” is required to find that a person is “acting as a lawyer in the proceeding” under § 455(b)(5)(ii)); see also U.S. ex rel.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Salemme
See Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101, 1114-15 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Woodson
See United States v. Clark, 613 F.2d 391, 400 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980), cited in Butler, 335 Md. at 254 , 643 A.2d at 397 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas W. Tierney
(2×)
See Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir.) (Potashnick ), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980); SCA Services, Inc. v. Morgan, 557 F.2d 110 (7th Cir.1977) (SCA ).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonelli v. Bonelli
See Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101 , 1114-15 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S. Ct. 78 , 66 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
FMC Corp. v. Boesky
See Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Co., Inc. v. American Fidelity Life Insurance Co., 606 F.2d 602, 606 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 77 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980) (the corporate plaintiff repurchased its own stock for cash); Bankers Life & Casualty Co., 404 U.S. at 8-9 , 92 S.Ct. at 166-67 (the plaintiff corporation was a seller when it exchanged its treasury bonds for cash); Wright v. Heizer Corp., 560 F.2d 236, 247 (7th Cir.1977); cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1066 , 98 S.Ct. 1243 , 55 L.Ed.2d 767 (1978) (the corporation was a seller when it issued stock to an investor fo…
discussed
Cited "see"
Ainsworth v. Combined Insurance Co. of America
See Potashnick v. Port City Const. Co., 609 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir.) (judge was disqualified from case where, during the litigation before him, judge was not only being represented in another matter by counsel for the litigant, but also had personal business dealings with that counsel), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980); ABA Comm. on Ethics and Professional Responsibility, Informal Op. 1477 (1981) (a judge must recuse himself in cases in which a litigant is represented by the judge's own attorney).
discussed
Cited "see"
Debra Ackerman v. Western Electric Company, Inc., a Corporation, Debra Ackerman v. Western Electric Company, Inc., a Corporation
See Greater West-chester Home-Owners Ass’n v. City of Los Angeles, 26 Cal.3d 86, 102 , 160 Cal.Rptr. 733, 740 , 603 P.2d 1329, 1336 (1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 77 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Valery
See generally State v. Dupart, 383 So.2d 1226 (La.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 77 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980); State v. Toussaint, 429 So.2d 206 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Connors Steel Company
See Potashnick v. Port City Const. Co., 609 F.2d 1101 , 1111 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980). 11 75 We now turn to the objective facts that might reasonably cause an objective observer to question Judge Lynne's impartiality.
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Connors Steel Co.
See Potashnick v. Port City Const. Co., 609 F.2d 1101 , 1111 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980). 11 We now turn to the objective facts that might reasonably cause an objective observer to question Judge Lynne’s impartiality.
cited
Cited "see"
Gillan v. Commissioner
See Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101 , 1118 (5th Cir. 1980) , cert. denied 449 U.S. 820 (1980) ; Frazier v. Commissioner, 91 T.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
National City Bank v. Flowers (In Re Flowers)
See, Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir.1980), cert. den. 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 ; Hullam v. Burrows, 266 F.2d 547 (6th Cir.1959); In re Trivedi, 22 B.R. 246 (Bankr.S.D.Ohio 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tome
United States v. Doulin, 538 F.2d 466, 471 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976); see United States v. Clark, 613 F.2d 391, 402-04 (2d Cir.1979) (even if acquitted on the conspiracy count, coconspirator’s statements may be admissible on the substantive count), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
40 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1597, 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,451 Irving P. Gray v. New England Telephone and Telegraph Company, Irving P. Gray v. New England Telephone and Telegraph Company
See Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101, 1117-19 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
See Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101, 1117-19 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980) .
cited
Cited "see"
Christine Amidi v. Surety Title Agency, Inc.
See Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 (1981); United States v. Ritter, 540 F.2d 459 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
(2×)
See Potashnick v. Port City Construction Co., 609 F.2d 1101 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980) (plaintiff's attorney was representing judge, albeit nominally, in several pending unrelated matters); Texaco v. Chandler, 354 F.2d 655 (10th Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 383 U.S. 936 , 86 S.Ct. 1066 , 15 L.Ed.2d 853 *433 (1966) (one of plaintiff's attorneys was at time of trial defending judge in another action brought against judge personally); DeCamp v. Good Samaritan Hospital, 66 A.D.2d 766 , 410 N.Y.S.2d 671 , (1978) (attorney for defendant revealed that he…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hessen v. Beagan (In Re Teltronics Services, Inc.)
See Potashnick v. Port City Const. Co., 609 F.2d 1101 , 1111 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980); United States v. Ritter, 540 F.2d 459 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 951 , 97 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed.2d 319 (1976); Matter of Searches Conducted on March 5, 1980, 497 F.Supp. 1283, 1291 (E.D.Wis.1980); Smith v. Pepsico, Inc., 434 F.Supp. 524 (S.D.Fla.1977).” In re Parr, 13 B.R. 1010, 1017 (E.D.N.Y.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re WHET, Inc.
See id. at 21 (citing Potashnick v. Port City Const. Co., 609 F.2d 1101 , 1111 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980) (father of trial judge was partner in law firm representing a party in the case, and attorney for the plaintiff also represented judge in unrelated matter; “questionable case” calling for disqualification)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Susan Berns v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
Cal.Civil Code § 3288; see, Greater Westchester Homeowners’ Assoc. v. City of Los Angeles, 26 Cal.3d 86, 102-103 , 160 Cal.Rptr. 733 , 603 P.2d 1329 (1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 77 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. State Of Oregon
See Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 617 F.2d 537, 540 (10th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. granted on other issues, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 71 , 66 L.Ed.2d 21 (1980), restored to calendar, --- U.S. ----, 101 S.Ct. 3156 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1981); Fontenelle v. Omaha Tribe of Neb., 430 F.2d 143, 147 (8th Cir. 1970); Maryland Cas.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Samuel B. Hewitt and Bobby Gene Chesser
Accord, United States v. Clark, 613 F.2d 391, 400 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980); United States v. Lasky, 600 F.2d 765, 769 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 979 , 100 S.Ct. 480 , 62 L.Ed.2d 405 (1979); United States v. Barket, 530 F.2d 181, 188 (8th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 917 , 97 S.Ct. 308 , 50 L.Ed.2d 282 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Northeast Phoenix Homeowners' Ass'n v. Scottsdale Municipal Airport
See Greater Westchester Homeowners Association v. City of Los Angeles, 26 Cal.3d 86 , 160 Cal.Rptr. 733 , 603 P.2d 1329 (1979), cert. den. 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 77 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980); Owen v. City of Atlanta, 157 Ga.App. 354 , 277 S.E.2d 338 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oregon
See Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 617 F.2d 537, 540 (10th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. granted on other issues, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 71 , 66 L.Ed.2d 21 (1980), restored to calendar, U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 3156 , 69 L.Ed.2d 1003 (1981); Fontenelle v. Omaha Tribe of Neb., 430 F.2d 143, 147 (8th Cir. 1970); Maryland Cas.
discussed
Cited "see"
Flushing Savings Bank v. Parr (In Re Parr)
See Potashnick v. Port City Const. Co., 609 F.2d 1101, 1111 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980); United States v. Ritter, 540 F.2d 459 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 951 , 97 S.Ct. 370 , 50 L.Ed.2d 319 (1976); Matter of Searches Conducted on March 5, 1980, 497 F.Supp. 1283, 1291 (E.D.Wisc.1980); Smith v. Pepsico, Inc., 434 F.Supp. 524 (S.D.Fla.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Montana
(2×)
See Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 617 F. 2d 537, 545, n. 4 (CA10) (en banc), cert. granted, 449 U. S. 820 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Babbitt Ford, Inc. v. Navajo Indian Tribe
See Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 617 F.2d 537, 540 (10th Cir.), cert. granted, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 71 , 66 L.Ed.2d 21 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Eastman
See, also, United States v. Clark, 613 F.2d 391,400 (2nd Cir.1979), certiorari denied 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 as quoted in State v. Widner, 68 Ohio St.2d 188, 190 , 429 N.E.2d 1065 , 1066–1067(1981). {¶62} In Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. a]123, 135–136, 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), the United States Supreme Court noted that “[a] defendant is entitled to a fair trial but not a perfect one.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Alexander
See, also, United States v. Clark (C.A. 2, 1979), 613 F.2d 391 , certiorari denied 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (a second prosecution is not barred on double jeopardy grounds when the trial judge had no reasonable alternative to ordering a mistrial in the first trial); State v. Widner (1981), 68 Ohio St.2d 188, 190 , 429 N.E.2d 1065, 1066-1067 . {43} In Illinois v. Somerville (1973), 410 U.S. 458, 464 , 93 S.Ct. 1066 , 35 L.Ed.2d 425 , the Supreme Court further refined the circumstances under which a trial court can order a mistrial: {44} "A trial judge properly exercises his di…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aparo v. Superior Court for the Judicial District
Where a previous judgment of acquittal was based upon a general verdict, as is usually the case, this approach requires a court to ‘examine the record of a prior proceeding, taking into account the pleadings, evidence, charge, and other relevant matter, and conclude whether a rational jury could have grounded its verdict upon an issue other than that which the defendant seeks to foreclose from consideration.’ The inquiry ‘must be set in a practical frame and viewed with an eye to all the circumstances of the proceedings.’ ” Id. at 444 , 90 S.Ct. at 1194 (quoting Sealfon v. United Sta…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Seagoing Uniform Corp. v. Texaco, Inc.
See e.g., Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Co. v. American Fidelity Life Insurance Co., 606 F.2d 602, 616 (5th Cir.1979), reh’g denied, 610 F.2d 818 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 77 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980) (In a shareholders’ derivative action alleging, inter alia that defendants carried out a stock repurchase program to retain their position in the corporation by driving up the price of the corporation’s shares with the purpose of discouraging others from attempting to gain control of the corporation, the Court found that there was a material fact issue as to…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Murad Nersesian
The American Bar Association Standards for Criminal Justice state: “[i]t is unprofessional conduct for the prosecutor to express his or her personal belief or opinion as to the truth or falsity of any testimony or evidence or the guilt of the defendant.” ABA Standards for Criminal Justice 3-5.8(b) (2d ed. 1980); see also United States v. Clark, 613 F.2d 391, 405 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980); Suarez, 588 F.2d at 354 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Howard v. Malcolm
See, e.g., Alabama Farm Bureau Mutual Casualty Company, Inc. v. American Fidelity Life Insurance Co., 606 F.2d 602, 609 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 77 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Russell Damsky, Peter B. Findlen, Gary Romano
See, e.g., United States v. Clark, 613 F.2d 391, 405 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nolan
See, e.g., United States v. Clark, 613 F.2d 391, 405-06 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980); United States v. Quesada, 512 F.2d 1043, 1045 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 356 , 46 L.Ed.2d 277 (1975); United States v. Lawson, 507 F.2d 433, 438-39 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 1446 , 43 L.Ed.2d 762 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nolan
See, e.g., United States v. Clark, 613 F.2d 391, 405-06 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980); United States v. Quesada, 512 F.2d 1043, 1045 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 946 , 96 S.Ct. 356 , 46 L.Ed.2d 277 (1975); United States v. Lawson, 507 F.2d 433, 438-39 (7th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004 , 95 S.Ct. 1446 , 43 L.Ed.2d 762 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Martin-Trigona v. Lavien
See, e.g., Potashnick v. Port City Const. Co., 609 F.2d 1101 , 1111 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 78 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Widner
See, also, United States v. Clark (C.A., 2, 1979), 613 F. 2d 391 , certiorari denied 449 U. S. 820 (a second prosecution is not barred on double jeopardy grounds when the trial judge had no reasonable alternative to ordering a mistrial in the first trial).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
San Diego Unified Port District, and Air Transport Association of America, Intervening v. Adriana Gianturco
See, e. g., Greater Westchester Homeowners Ass'n v. City of Los Angeles, 26 Cal.3d 86 , 160 Cal.Rptr. 733 , 603 P.2d 1329 (1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 77 , 66 L.Ed.2d 22 (1980). 17 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah
The Supreme Court has expressly confirmed the power of Indian tribes to tax non-Indians entering the reservation to engage in economic activity, Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian Reservation, 447 U.S. 134, 152-154 , 100 S.Ct. 2069, 2080-2081 , 65 L.Ed.2d 10 (1980); see also Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe, 617 F.2d 537 (10th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. granted, 449 U.S. 820 , 101 S.Ct. 71 , 66 L.Ed.2d 21 , as well as to regulate at least some forms of activity on fee lands.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Webster v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
We consider the policies determinative of federal taxation issues relating to Indians to be equally valid for this state taxation question. 18 Holt v. Commissioner, 364 F.2d 38, 40 (8th Cir. 1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 931 , rehearing denied, 386 U.S. 939 . 19 United States v. Anderson, 625 F.2d 910, 916 (9th Cir. 1980), petition for cert. filed. 20 Menominee Tribe, 391 U.S. at 406 . 21 Anderson , note 19; Jourdain v. Commissioner, 617 F.2d 507, 509 (8th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 839 , 101 S. Ct. 116 ; LaFontaine v. Commissioner, 533 F.2d 382 (8th Cir. 1976). 22 Mescalero Apache Tri…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Merrion, dba Merrion & Bayless
v.
Jicarilla Apache Tribe and Amoco Production Co. v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
v.
Jicarilla Apache Tribe and Amoco Production Co. v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
No. 80-11; No. 80-15.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
449 U.S. 820
Consideration, Petitions, Took.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument.
Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.Reported below: 617 F. 2d 537.