green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1987 ·
…the failure to comply with a state's contemporaneous objection requirement cannot be deferred to as a separate and independent procedural ground precluding federal review if the state itself did not preclude review on the basis of that requirement.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Debra Jo Hamilton
But cf. United States v. Avery, 621 F.2d 214, 215-16 (5th Cir.1980)(affirming district court's finding that promise to stand mute at time of sentence did not preclude government from responding to probation officer's request for information), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 (1981).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Eugene Rice v. Ronald C. Marshall
(2×)
the failure to comply with a state's contemporaneous objection requirement cannot be deferred to as a separate and independent procedural ground precluding federal review if the state itself did not preclude review on the basis of that requirement.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. William Shaffer
defense counsel's knowledge of the effectively nullified ... when a prosecutor misleads the defense into believing the evidence will not be favorable to the defendant
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Miller
(2×)
See United States v. Robertson, 698 F.2d 703, 709 (5thCir.1983) (noting Rule 11 protections not applicable to a defendant who pleads not guilty even when not guilty plea is coupled with an inculpatory stipulation of facts) (citing Witherspoon v. United States, 633 F.2d 1247, 1252 (6thCir.l980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1396 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981); United States v. Strother, 578 F.2d 397, 404-05 (D.C.Cir.1978); United States v. Terrack, 515 F.2d 558, 560 (9thCir.l975)); Gerald v. United States, 405 F.Supp. 404, 406 (E.D.N.C.1975) (noting that “[u]pon a plea of not guilty the co…
cited
Cited "see"
State v. White
Accord *833 Hughes v. Hopper, 629 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1396 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981); see State v. Sykes, 628 S.W.2d 653, 656-57 (Mo.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mustread v. Gilmore
See Hughes v. Hopper, 629 F.2d 1036, 1040 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1396 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981) (although nondisclosure of an exculpatory investigative report constituted a Brady violation, reversal was not required where petitioner's trial counsel had the substance of the report and used it during trial). 25 The other claims raised by Mr. Mustread are meritless and warrant no discussion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mustread v. Gilmore
See Hughes v. Hopper, 629 F.2d 1036, 1040 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1396 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981) (although nondisclosure of an exculpatory investigative report constituted a Brady violation, reversal was not required where petitioner’s trial counsel had the substance of the report and used it during trial).
cited
Cited "see"
Landano v. Rafferty
See Hughes v. Hopper, 629 F.2d 1036 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1396 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. North
See, United States v. DeLoach, 654 F.2d 763, 765-67 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 366 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Leon Alcorn v. Steve Smith, Warden Kentucky State Reformatory
See Hockenbury v. Sowders, 620 F.2d 111 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
James E. Davis v. Harry L. Allsbrooks, Warden of the Northhampton Co. Prison State of North Carolina
(2×)
See Hockenbury v. Sowders, 620 F.2d 111, 115 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981); Dietz v. Solem, 640 F.2d 126 , 131-32 & n. 1 (8th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Morris Martin v. Dale E. Foltz
See Hockenbury v. Sowders, 620 F.2d 111, 115 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Daniel Duane Gilbert v. Al Parke
See Hockenbury v. Sowders, 620 F.2d 111, 115-16 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Gerald W. Hughes v. Dale Foltz
See Hockenbury v. Sowders, 620 F.2d 111 (6th Cir. 1980). cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Rita M. Lavelle
See United States v. DeLoach, 654 F.2d 763 (D.C.Cir.1980) (allowing the introduction of prior bad acts evidence to show the intentional filing of false statements), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 366 (1981); United States v. Childs, 598 F.2d 169, 173-74 (D.C.Cir.1979) (allowing the introduction of prior crimes evidence to show the specific intent to obstruct the carriage of mail).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Foltz
See Cook v. Bordenkircher, 602 F.2d 117 (6th Cir., cert. denied 444 U.S. 936 , 100 S.Ct. 286 , 62 L.Ed.2d 196 (1979), and Hockenbury v. Sowders, 620 F.2d 111 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne Doyce McWilliams
(2×)
See George v. United States, 633 F.2d 1299, 1301 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1397 , 67 L.Ed.2d 368 (1981); United States v. Sherman, 474 F.2d 303, 305-07 (9th Cir.1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Wood Jones, Frank J. Deluna, Raymond Arnona and Robert Lee Wilson
See Hughes v. Hopper, 629 F.2d 1036, 1039 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1396 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981) (Brady is not violated where the defendant is given the substance of the exculpatory material).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Julius Carroll Robertson
(2×)
See Witherspoon v. United States, 6 Cir.1980, 633 F.2d 1247, 1252 , cert. denied, 1981, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1396 ; 67 L.Ed.2d 367 ; United States v. Strother, D.C.Cir.1978, 578 F.2d 397, 404-05 ; United States v. Terrack, 9 Cir.1975, 515 F.2d 558, 560 ; cf. United States v. Wray, 8 Cir.1979, 608 F.2d 722, 724 , cert. denied, 1980, 444 U.S. 1048 , 100 S.Ct. 739 , 62 L.Ed.2d 735 .
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America v. William MULDERIG
See Hughes v. Hopper, 629 F.2d 1036, 1039 (5th Cir.1980) (noting that defense knowledge of exculpatory evidence may be nullified when "prosecution misleads defense into believing the evidence will not be favorable to the defendant"), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1396 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM MULDERIG
See Hughes v. Hopper, 629 F.2d 1036, 1039 (5th Cir. 1980) (noting that defense knowledge of exculpatory evidence may be nullified when “prosecution misleads defense into believing the evidence will not be favorable to the defendant”), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Watt
See, e.g., United States v. DeLoach, 654 F.2d 763 (D.C.Cir.1980) (allowing the introduction of 404(b) evidence to show the intentional filing of false statements), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 366 (1981); United States v. Childs, 598 F.2d 169, 173-74 (D.C.Cir.1979) (allowing the introduction of 404(b) evidence to show specific intent to obstruct the carriage of mail).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Avery Herndon
See, e.g., Witherspoon v. United States, 633 F.2d 1247 (6th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1396 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981); United States v. Brown, 428 F.2d 1100 (D.C.Cir.1970); United States v. Miller, 588 F.2d 1256, 1263-64 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 947 , 99 S.Ct. 1426 , 59 L.Ed.2d 636 (1979). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Oliver L. North
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. DeLoach, 654 F.2d 763, 765-67 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 366 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnny Ray Bagby v. Dewey Sowders
(2×)
See also Hockenbury v. Sowders, 620 F.2d 111, 115 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981) (when state court arguably relies on both procedural and substantive grounds for denial of petitioner's claim, federal habeas court must determine whether failure to comply with contemporaneous objection rule was "a substantial basis" of the state court's denial.) 109 I, therefore, turn to the merits of this claim.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R.B. Williams v. Al C. Parke, Warden
(2×)
See, e.g., Hockenbury v. Sowders, 620 F.2d 111, 115 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981); Cook v. Bordenkircher, 602 F.2d 117, 119 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 936 , 100 S.Ct. 286 , 62 L.Ed.2d 196 (1979); cf. United States v. Markey, 693 F.2d 594, 597 (6th Cir.1982) (in federal trial where no objection made, review Allen charge for plain error); United States v. Giacalone, 588 F.2d 1158, 1167 (6th Cir.1978) (same), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 944 , 99 S.Ct. 2162 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1979); United States v. LaRiche, 549 F.2d 1088, 1092 (6th Cir.) (s…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Douglas v. Wainwright
See also Hockenbury v. Sowders, 620 F.2d 111 , 112-13 & n. 1 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981) 21 We note that, even if Witherspoon were violated, appellant could not have been prejudiced by any such violation, at least as to sentencing, because the jury recommended life imprisonment.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Douglas v. Wainwright
See also Hockenbury v. Sowders, 620 F.2d 111 , 112-13 & n. 1 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1395 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Corsentino
See United States v. Crusco, 536 F.2d 21 (3d Cir. 1976); see also United States v. Avery, 589 F.2d 906 (5th Cir. 1979) (per curiam), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 933 , 101 S.Ct. 1396 , 67 L.Ed.2d 367 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DeLoach, aka Zockman
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 80-5985.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2) · Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.