Consumers Power Co. v. Util. Workers Union, 451 U.S. 1014 (1981). · Go Syfert
Consumers Power Co. v. Util. Workers Union, 451 U.S. 1014 (1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
123 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 25 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Kevin Fuller Purnell (vactapp, 2002-12-23) · Strongest negative: Charles T. Lord v. Jack Duckworth (ca7, 1994-07-21)
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981 2003 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Charles T. Lord v. Jack Duckworth
7th Cir. · 1994 · signal: but see · confidence high
Bobo v. Kolb, 969 F.2d 391, 397 (7th Cir.1992); see also Bryan v. Warden, Indiana State Reformatory, 820 F.2d 217, 219 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 867 , 108 S.Ct. 190 , 98 L.Ed.2d 142 (1987); Perri v. Director, Dept. of Corrections, 817 F.2d 448 , 451-452 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 843 , 108 S.Ct. 135 , 98 L.Ed.2d 92 (1987); but see White v. Finkbeiner, 611 F.2d 186, 189-190 (7th Cir.1979) (stating that whether a statement was a request for counsel is a legal determination to which deference is not due), rev’d. on other grounds, 451 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 3000 , 69 L.Ed.2d 385 …
discussed Cited "see" Commonwealth v. Kevin Fuller Purnell
Va. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Monroe, 611 P.2d 1036, 1039-40 (Idaho 1980), vacated on other grounds, 451 U.S. 1014 (1981), on remand, 645 P.2d 363 (1982) (holding that officers' one hour delay in entering residence was not critical under the emergency doctrine analysis where evidence demonstrated emergency still existed).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Hope
Mo. Ct. App. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Greer, 605 S.W.2d 93, 95 (Mo.1980), vacated on other grounds, 451 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 3000 , 69 L.Ed.2d 385 (1981); State v. Thomas, 674 S.W.2d 131, 134 (Mo.App. 1984); State v. Garcia, 682 S.W.2d 12, 15 (Mo.App. 1984). 4 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Sailas
Idaho Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Monroe v. Idaho, 451 U.S. 1014 , 101 S.Ct. 3001 , 69 L.Ed.2d 385 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Kysar
Idaho · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Stovall v. Denno, supra. Both appellants were displayed ... shackled by handcuffs and accompanied by police officers." 95 Idaho at 529 , 511 P.2d at 811 . . 451 U.S. 1014 , 101 S.Ct. 3001 , 69 L.Ed.2d 385 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" State Ex Rel. Bulloch v. Seier (2×)
Mo. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Missouri v. Greer, 451 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 3000 , 69 L.Ed.2d 385 (1981).
cited Cited "see" State v. McGee
Mo. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Greer, 605 S.W.2d 93, 97 (Mo.1980), vacated on other grounds, 451 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 3000 , 69 L.Ed.2d 385 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Mitchell
Idaho · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Scoble, 28 Idaho 721 , 155 P. 969 (1916) (construing then effective R.C. § 7820). [10] Appellant argues that the Idaho statutes violate the sixth and fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution, and Art. 1, § 7, and Art. 5, § 13, of the Idaho Constitution. [1] The judgment of the Supreme Court was vacated for reconsideration by the Supreme Court of the United States. 451 U.S. 1014 , 101 S.Ct. 3001 , 69 L.Ed.2d 385 (1981).
discussed Cited "see" CBS Inc. (KMOX-TV) v. Campbell
Mo. Ct. App. · 1982 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Greer, 605 S.W.2d 93, 96 (Mo.1980), rev’d on other grounds, Missouri v. Greer, *33 451 U.S. 1013 , 101 S.Ct. 3000 , 69 L.Ed.2d 385 (1981), affirmed on remand, State v. Haggard, 619 S.W.2d 44 (Mo.banc 1981); Conway v. Quinn, 168 S.W.2d 445 , 446 (Mo.App.1942).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Consumers Power Co.
v.
Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO
No. 80-1674.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1981.
451 U.S. 1014
Published

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., ante, p. 504.