green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1993 ·
…prima facie proof of a constitutional violation must include evidence of impermissible motive
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Alicia Correa v. Steve Fischer, and Willacy County
prima facie proof of a constitutional violation must include evidence of impermissible motive
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Correa v. Fischer
prima facie proof of a constitutional violation must include evidence of impermissible motive
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Abdul A. Akhimie
See United States v. Johnson, 634 F.2d 735, 737-38 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
John D. Stough v. Walter J. Gallagher
(2×)
See Tanner v. McCall, 625 F.2d 1183, 1186 (5th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Erma Ray v. City of Leeds, and Jack Courson, Individually and in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Leeds
See Tanner v. McCall, 625 F.2d 1183, 1190 (5th Cir.1980) (observing that Branti requires the employer to “show that the required political support or affiliation is relevant or essential to the job”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert A. Greenwood
See United States v. Johnson, 634 F.2d 735 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1974 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981) (fraudulent medicaid forms probative of requisite intent for income tax evasion); see also United States v. Kaufman, 453 F.2d 306, 311 (2d Cir.1971) (prior tax fraud admissible as probative of intent in falsifying affidavits).
cited
Cited "see"
Donald C. Tomczak v. The City of Chicago, an Illinois Municipal Corporation
See Tanner v. McCall, 625 F.2d 1183, 1194-96 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Edward Andrews
See United States v. Enstam, 622 F.2d 857, 868 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 912 , 101 S.Ct. 1351 , 67 L.Ed.2d 336 , 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1974 , 68 L.Ed.2d 294 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenor
See Public Service Co. of New Mexico v. FERC, 628 F.2d 1267, 1270 (10th Cir.1980), cert.. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1974 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. FERC, 587 F.2d 671, 676 (5th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kansas Cities v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Intervenor
See, for example, the contracts construed in Public Service Co. of New Mexico v. FERC, 628 F.2d 1267, 1269-70 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1974 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981) (“This contract, including the tariff made a part hereof, shall at all times be subject to such changes or modifications as shall be ordered from time to time by any legally constituted regulatory body having jurisdiction to require such changes or modifications”) and Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. FERC, 587 F.2d 671, 675-76 (5th Cir.1979) (“The terms and conditions of this Agreement and Rate Sch…
cited
Cited "see"
Barnett v. Webster
See Bullard v. Webster, et al, 623 F.2d 1042 (5th Cir.1980) cert. den. 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1980); Bramley v. Webster, et al., 476 F.Supp. 351 (E.D.Pa. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sikes v. Boone
See Tanner v. McCall, 625 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981) (applying Florida law); Barrett v. Thomas, 649 F.2d 1193 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 925 , 102 S.Ct. 1969 , 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982) (applying Texas law); Allen v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, 515 F.Supp. 1185 (D.S.C.1981) (applying South Carolina law); Slack v. Bishop, 444 F.Supp. 1161 (W.D.La.1978) (applying Louisiana law).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hancock
United States v. Janis, 1 M.J. 395 (C.M.A.1976); Mil.R.Evid. 403; see United States v. Johnson, 634 F.2d 735 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1974 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 920 , 99 S.Ct. 1244 , 59 L.Ed.2d 472 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
BGW Associates, Inc. v. Valley Broadcasting Co.
See Leonhard v. United States, 633 F.2d 599, 609-10 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); International Paper Co. v. Whitson, 595 F.2d 559, 561-62 (10th Cir. 1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McRae v. Douglas
See also Tanner v. McCall, 441 F. Supp. 503 (M.D.Fla. 1977), modified on other grounds, 625 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Romero v. State
By statute, Florida deputy sheriffs have the “same power” as the sheriff appointing them and may serve warrants on behalf of the sheriff. §§ 30.07 and 30.15(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991); see also Tanner v. McCall, 626 F.2d 1183 (5th Cir.1980) (describing deputies as a sheriffs alter ego with all the sheriffs sovereign powers except the power to appoint other deputies), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); Johnson v. Wilson, 336 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976) (equating power of sheriff and deputy sheriff under section 30.07).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Frank Barbara, Jr.
United States v. Davis, 657 F.2d 637, 639 (4th Cir.1981); see also United States v. Johnson, 634 F.2d 735, 737 (4th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jimmie McBee v. Jim Hogg County, Texas and Gilbert Ybanez, Javier Alfonso Hinojosa v. Jim Hogg County, Texas
See, e.g., Tanner v. McCall, 625 F.2d 1183, 1189-90 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981); Barrett v. Thomas, 649 F.2d 1193, 1200-02 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 925 , 102 S.Ct. 1969 , 72 L.Ed.2d 440 (1982); Wren v. Jones, 635 F.2d 1277, 1286 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 832 , 102 S.Ct. 129 , 70 L.Ed.2d 110 (1981); Douglas v. Galloway, 568 F.Supp. 966 (S.D.W.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Cities of Bethany v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
See, e.g., Public Service Co. of New Mexico v. FERC, 628 F.2d 1267, 1270 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1974 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California
v.
Hall
v.
Hall
No. 80-904.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 20, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (2)
Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist. Certiorari denied.