green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.7 score
“the perimeter of an area is defined by function ... the statute does not require that the area's exclusive use be for maritime purposes so long as it is customarily used for significant maritime activity.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lawrence M. Davis v. Doran Company of California
the perimeter of an area is defined by function ... the statute does not require that the area's exclusive use be for maritime purposes so long as it is customarily used for significant maritime activity.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. City of Miami
consent decree can only be attacked on the ground that its substantive provisions unlawfully infringe the rights of the complainant
discussed
Cited "see"
Berkley v. United States
See Woodward v. United States, 871 F.2d at 1076 (quoting Beller v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788, 810 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied sub nom., Beller v. Lehman, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981)); see also Weiss v. United States, 510 U.S. at 176-77 , 114 S.Ct. 752 (rejecting a procedural due process claim); Goldman v. Weinberger, 475 U.S. 503, 507 , 106 S.Ct. 1310 , 89 L.Ed.2d 478 (1986) (denying a First Amendment claim); Rostker v. Goldberg, 453 U.S. at 65-72 , 101 S.Ct. 2646 (rejecting an equal protection claim).
cited
Cited "see"
Rossi v. Standard Roofing, Inc.
See Van Dyk Research Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 478 F.Supp. 1268, 1327-28 (D.N.J.1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Earl J. Parker, Jr. v. Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation Programs
Though twenty-three Fifth Circuit judges had "struggled bravely with the issue," we observed that a majority of that court was able to devise "little more than a litany of factors which are not conclusive in a situs determination." Id.; see Texports Stevedore Co. v. Winchester, 632 F.2d 504 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3031 , 69 L.Ed.2d 406 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
(2×)
Though twenty-three Fifth Circuit judges had "struggled bravely with the issue," we observed that a majority of that court was able to devise "little more than a litany of factors which are not conclusive in a situs determination." Id; see Texports Stevedore Co. v. Winchester, 632 F.2d 504 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carl v. Children's Hospital
(2×)
See Brinton v. Department of State, 204 U.S.App.D.C. 328, 332 , 636 F.2d 600, 604 (1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981); See also Upjohn, supra, 449 U.S. at 390 (privilege protects client's disclosure of confidential information to lawyer to enable lawyer to give advice).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mann v. Haigh
See Better v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788 , 797 (9th Cir.1980) cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981) (discharged Navy enlistee’s claim for reinstatement under Navy regulations); Brown v. Devine, 574 F.Supp. 790 (N.D.Cal. 1983) (BRIOH benefits); Sheehan v. Army & Air Force Exchange Service, 619 F.2d 1132 (5th Cir.1980), rev’d on other grounds, 456 U.S. 728 , 102 S.Ct. 2118 , 72 L.Ed.2d 520 , on remand, 686 F.2d 262 (1982) (wrongful discharge of NAFI employee under AAFES regulations and due process); Chabal v. Reagan, 822 F.2d 349 (3rd Cir.1987), later app. ajfing …
cited
Cited "see"
AFIA/CIGNA Worldwide v. Felkner
See Alabama v. Marshall, 626 F.2d 366, 368-69 (5th Cir.1980), ce rt. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Afia Cigna Worldwide v. Felkner
See Alabama v. Marshall, 626 F.2d 366, 368-69 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rafael Triguero v. Consolidated Rail Corporation, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Third-Party v. Universal Maritime Service Corporation, Third-Party
Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Co. v. Herron, 568 F.2d 137, 141 (9th Cir.1978); see Texports Stevedore Co. v. Winchester, 632 F.2d 504 (5th Cir.1980) (a worker in a gear room five blocks from dockside satisfies the situs test), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3031 , 69 L.Ed.2d 406 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William Clinton Roark
See United States v. Semek, 634 F.2d 1159 , 1167 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3031 , 69 L.Ed.2d 406 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Morgan v. Walter
See In re Beef Industry, 607 F.2d 167, 172 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981); Altman v. Liberty Equities Corp., 54 F.R.D. 620, 625 (1972); In re Mid-Atlantic Toyota, 564 F.Supp. 1379, 1387 (D.Md.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Minpeco, S.A. v. Hunt
See In re Beef Ind. Antitrust Litigation, 607 F.2d 167, 180 (5th Cir.1979) (court approved settlement in which settling defendant agreed to assist plaintiffs by providing access to witnesses), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981); In re Ampicillin Antitrust Litig., 82 F.R.D. 652, 653 (D.D.C.1979) (approving settlement in which settling defendant agreed to help obtain deposition and trial testimony of its employees and former employees).
cited
Cited "see"
Steffan v. Cheney
See generally Beller v. Mittendorf 632 F.2d 788 , 801 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
James M. Woodward v. United States
See Beller v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788, 812 (9th Cir.[1980]), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 [1981].
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Local 560 (I.B.T.)
See United States v. Zemek, 634 F.2d 1159 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 916 , 101 S.Ct. 1359 , 67 L.Ed.2d 341 & 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3031 , 69 L.Ed.2d 406 (1981) (tavern owner’s right to solicit business free from threatened destruction and physical harm fell within scope of protected property rights under this section); United States v. Santoni, 585 F.2d 667 (4th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 1221 , 59 L.Ed.2d 459 (1979) (right to company to make business decision free from outside pressure wrongfully imposed constitutes “property” for purposes of extort…
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard P. Christy Thomas B. Guthrie Ira Perkins v. Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior United States Department of Interior
When legislation impairs the exercise of a “fundamental” right, the government “must prove to the Court that the law is necessary to promote a compelling or overriding interest.” 2 Rotunda § 15.4, at 59; accord Beller v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788, 808 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 , 454 U.S. 855 , 102 S.Ct. 304 , 70 L.Ed.2d 150 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Michael Donovan, William Ford, James Kazel, and Judy Keogh, Cross-Appellees v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, Cross-Appellant
See Brinton v. Department of State, 636 F.2d 600, 606 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Doe v. William J. Casey, Director, C.I.A.
See Belter v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788 , 806 (9th Cir.1980) (when "real stigma imposed by the Navy’s action ... is the charge of homosexuality," which plaintiffs admit, there is no deprivation of liberty), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Norman C. Edwards, Jr., Robert H. Bolden, Jr.
See United States v. Fontenot, 628 F.2d 921 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 406 (1981); Hoover v. United States, 358 F.2d 87 (5th Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 822 , 87 S.Ct. 50 , 17 L.Ed.2d 59 (1966).
cited
Cited "see"
Namoff v. Lynch
See In Re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, 607 F.2d 167 (5th Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Dennis Greenman Securities Litigation
See In Re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, 607 F.2d 167 (5th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tennessee ex rel. Leech v. Dole
See Better v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788 , 799 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 , reh. denied, 454 U.S. 1069 , 102 S.Ct. 621 , 70 L.Ed.2d 605 (1981); Glines v. Wade, 586 F.2d 675, 681 (9th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Tennessee v. Dole
See Beller v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788, 799 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 , reh. denied, 454 U.S. 1069 , 102 S.Ct. 621 , 70 L.Ed.2d 605 (1981); Glines v. Wade, 586 F.2d 675, 681 (9th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
James L. Dronenburg v. Vice Admiral Lando Zech, Chief of Naval Personnel
See Better v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788, 812 (9th Cir.), cert, denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Aimee Magnus Flanigan, Deceased, Peter M. Flanigan, Personal Representative v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue, Estate of Horace C. Flanigan, Deceased, Peter M. Flanigan, Personal Representative v. Commissioner, Internal Revenue
See State of Alabama v. Marshall, 626 F.2d 366, 368-69 (5th Cir.1980) ("the law is well settled that a statute must be interpreted according to the plain language unless a clear contrary legislative intention is shown") (citing United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115 , 100 S.Ct. 948 , 63 L.Ed.2d 250 (1980)), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981)). 4 21 The cases cited by appellants do not support their position that (e)(2)(A) does not apply to (b)(2).
discussed
Cited "see"
Estate of Flanigan v. Commissioner
See State of Alabama v. Marshall, 626 F.2d 366, 368-69 (5th Cir.1980) (“the law is well settled that a statute must be interpreted according to the plain language unless a clear contrary legislative intention is shown”) (citing United States v. Apfelbaum, 445 U.S. 115 , 100 S.Ct. 948 , 63 L.Ed.2d 250 (1980)), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981)). 4 The cases cited by appellants do not support their position that (e)(2)(A) does not apply to (b)(2).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gilday v. Webster
See Beller v. Middendorf 632 F.2d 788 , 798 n. 5 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981); American Association of Commodity Traders v. Dept. of Treasury, 598 F.2d 1233, 1235 (1st Cir. 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
The Mid-South Grizzlies v. The National Football League
See Van Dyk Research Corp. v. Zerox Corp., 631 F.2d 251, 255 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Dee Snider, United States of America v. Billy Gene Reneau, United States of America v. Sheri L. Able
See United States v. Zemek, 634 F.2d 1159, 1167 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3031 , 69 L.Ed.2d 406 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Mid-South Grizzlies v. National Football League
See Van Dyk Research Corp. v. Zerox Corp., 631 F.2d 251, 255 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pavlov v. Parsons
Larson, 337 U.S. at 691 n. 11, 69 S.Ct. at 1462 n. 11; Carter v. Seamans, 411 F.2d 767, 770 (5th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 941 , 90 S.Ct. 953 , 25 L.Ed.2d 121 (1970); see Beller v. Middendorf 632 F.2d 788 , 798 n. 5 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leroy Wright
See United States v. Fontenot, 628 F.2d 921, 925 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 406 (1981); United States v. Meier, 607 F.2d 215, 217 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 1658 , 64 L.Ed.2d 243 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ruth Miller v. Central Dispatch, Inc. And Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
See Texports Stevedore Co. v. Winchester, 632 F.2d 504, 508-511 (5th Cir. 1980) (en banc), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3031 , 69 L.Ed.2d 406 (1981); Boudreaux v. American Workover, Inc., 664 F.2d at 465-67 . 14 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Nasser v. City of Homewood
Accord, Amdur v. City of Chicago, 638 F.2d 37 , 39 n. 3 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3031 , 69 L.Ed.2d 406 (1981); cf. Churchill Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States, 533 F.2d 411 (8th Cir. 1976) (economic injury alone not sufficient for standing under NEPA).
discussed
Cited "see"
Karahalios v. Defense Language Institute Foreign Language Center Presidio
See Better v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788 , 798 n.5 (9th Cir. 1980) cert. denied sub nom Better v. Lehman, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981) and Miller v. Weinberger, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 304 , 70 L.Ed.2d 150 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maximo Hernandez, Jr. v. Clifford Alexander, Jr., Secretary of the Department of the Army
See Beller v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788 , 798-99 n.6 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 ; cf., Parks v. United States Internal Revenue Service, 618 F.2d 677, 681 (10th Cir.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Law v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
See, e.g., Van Dyk Research Corp. v. Xerox Corp., 631 F.2d 251, 254-56 (3d Cir.1980), cert, denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981) (plaintiff not entitled to recovery where injury caused by cash flow problems, inability to raise money through new stock offerings, and failure of marketing arrangement); R.S.E., Inc. v. Pennsy Supply, Inc., 523 F.Supp. 954, 964 (M.D.Pa.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Adams v. Robertson
See e.g., In re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, 607 F.2d 167 , 177-78 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied 452 U.S. 905 [ 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 ] (1981); City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp, 495 F.2d 448, 464-466 (1974); *1301 Bowling v. Pfizer, Inc., 143 F.R.D. 141 (S.D.Ohio 1992); In re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation, 643 F.2d 195, 223 (5th Cir.1981); Hill v. Art Rice Realty Co., 66 F.R.D. 449 (N.D.Ala.1974), affirmed 511 F.2d 1400 (5th Cir.1975). 16.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles v. Rice, Secretary USAF
See, e.g., Rich v. Secretary of the Army, 735 F.2d 1220, 1226 (10th Cir.1984) (enlistee discharged according to regulations lacked property interest in remainder of enlistment term); accord Guerra v. Scruggs, 942 F.2d 270, 278 (4th Cir.1991); see also Better v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788 , 805 (9th Cir.1980) (enlistee held no property interest in remainder of enlistment term because no reasonable expectation of continued employment existed once enlistee was found to be within regulatory class of dischargeable persons), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981); cf. Nava…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles v. Rice, Secretary USAF
Plaintiff stated at oral argument that the record contained evidence that he held a property right in his military position in the form of a "retention letter." While that letter, dated June 20, 1990, informed plaintiff that he had been selected "for continued retention" in ANGUS through 1992, it also contained the following caveat: "Selection for continued retention . . . does not preclude applicable military authority from separating you for other reasons [in accordance with] applicable ANG or USAF regulations . . . ." We need not decide whether plaintiff had a "legitimate claim of entitleme…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Providence Journal Company and Gerald M. Carbone v. United States Department of the Army
See, e.g., Brinton v. Department of State, 686 F.2d 600, 605 (D.C.Cir.1980) (age or length of retention of predecisional document irrelevant to question of agency “adoption”), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981); Ashley v. Department of Labor, 589 F.Supp. 901, 908 (D.D.C.1983) (no implied adoption “even if a disputed document is several years old ... [and] has not yet produced a[n] [anticipated] final decision”). 6 The proposed “implied adoption” rule would undermine Exemption 5 by inhibiting the free exchange of views within an agency.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Guerrero v. Stone
See e.g., Beller v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788, 796-97 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981). 7 The various boards for correction of military records derive their authority from 10 U.S.C. § 1552 (a)(1): 8 The Secretary of a military department may correct any military record of the Secretary's department when the Secretary considers it necessary to correct an error or remove an injustice.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Guerrero v. Stone
See e.g., Better v. Middendorf, 632 F.2d 788 , 796-97 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rojem v. United States Department of Justice
See, e.g., Brinton v. Dept. of State, 636 F.2d 600, 606 (D.C.Cir.1980), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3030 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
South Carolina National Bank v. Stone
See, e.g., In re Beef Industry Antitrust Litig., 607 F.2d 167, 177-78 (5th Cir.1979), reh’g denied, 609 F.2d 1008 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981); South Carolina Nat’l Bank v. Stone, 749 F.Supp. at 1428 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re A.H. Robins Company, Incorporated, Debtor
See, e.g., In re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, 607 F.2d 167 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Harris v. Pernsley
See, e.g., Greenfield, 483 F.2d 824 (timing and effectiveness); Tate v. Werner, 68 F.R.D. 513 (E.D.Pa.1975) (cost, size, identification, timing); see also In re Beef Industry Antitrust Litigation, 607 F.2d 167 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 452 U.S. 905 , 101 S.Ct. 3029 , 69 L.Ed.2d 405 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.
v.
Meat Price Investigators Assn.
v.
Meat Price Investigators Assn.
No. 79-1214.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 1981.
Cited by 6 opinions | Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.