green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.9 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ford v. Jurgens
he primary motivating purpose behind the creation of the document was to aid in possible future litigation.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Shell Oil Refinery
an attorney who acts as his client's business advisor, or his agent for receipt or disbursement of money or property to or from third parties is not acting in a legal capacity, and records of such transactions are not privileged
discussed
Cited "see"
Stout v. Illinois Farmers Insurance
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1040 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981); United States v. Gulf Oil Corp., 760 F.2d 292, 296 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1985); Binks Manufacturing Co. v. National Presto Industries, Inc., 709 F.2d 1109, 1119 (7th Cir.1983) (quoting Janicker); Blockbuster Entertainment Corp. v. McComb Video, Inc., 145 F.R.D. 402, 403-04 (M.D.La.1992) (citing Davis); Allendate Mutual Insurance Co. v. Bull Data Systems, Inc., 145 F.R.D. 84, 87 (N.D.Ill.1992) (quoting Binks quoting Janicker); Colonial Gas Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Moseley
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1037 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981) (IRS denied that it already possessed the information and taxpayer maintained that IRS received the information from a local bank).
discussed
Cited "see"
Guy v. United Healthcare Corp.
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981); In re Grand Jury Investigation, 599 F.2d 1224, 1229 (3d Cir.1979); Leonen v. Johns-Manville, 135 F.R.D. 94 (D.N.J.1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mullen & Co.
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1043 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rockwell International
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028 , 1044 n. 20 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rockwell International
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028 , 1044 n. 20 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bankr. L. Rep. P 73,034 United States of America v. Judith E. White and Richard L. White
(2×)
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1041 (5th Cir.) (finding that the Fisher requirement that a document privileged in the hands of an attorney be privileged in the hands of the client is inapplicable where the communications for the purpose of representation were not preexisting records), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. (Under Seal), in Re John Doe No. 462
Accord United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1043 (5th Cir.), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 632 F.2d 1033, 1044 (3d Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, and Mark W. Lawler, Special Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. James E. Lask and Ruth L. Lask
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1036 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981); United States v. Cortese, 614 F.2d 914, 920 (3d Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert C. Jones and Dona Jones
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1038-39 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981). 5 *478 Once the court determines that the answers requested would tend to incriminate the witness, it should not attempt to speculate whether the witness will in fact be prosecuted.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fox
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1043 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Vincent Albano
See United States v. Rice, 645 F.2d 691, 694 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 318 , 70 L.Ed.2d 160 (1982); United States v. Hargis, 568 F.2d 21, 23 (7th Cir.1977); Fox v. United States, 354 F.2d 752, 753-54 (10th Cir.1965); Engle v. United States, 332 F.2d 88, 90 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 903 , 85 S.Ct. 192 , 13 L.Ed.2d 176 (1964); Sanford v. King, 136 F.2d 106, 108 (5th Cir.1943); United States v. Pisano, 266 F.Supp. 913 (E.D.Pa.1967).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, Etc.
(2×)
See United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1041 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981); United States v. Authement, 607 F.2d 1129, 1132 (5th Cir. 1979). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Glenn Hedden v. Kean University
June 29, 1989)); see also United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1043 (5th Cir.) (communications made to an attorney to prepare a tax return were not privileged because such work is primarily an accounting service), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S. Ct. 320 , 70 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Glenn Hedden v. Kean University
June 29, 1989)); see also United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1043 (5th Cir.) (communications made to an attorney to prepare a tax return were not privileged because such work is primarily an accounting service), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S. Ct. 320 , 70 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1040 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981); Hercules Inc. v. Exxon Corp., 434 F.Supp. 136, 151 (D.Del.1977).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Washington
See, e.g., United States v. Washington (Lower Elwha Tribe), 459 F.Supp. 1020 , 1066 (1976), affd, 642 F.2d 1141 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 161 (1981). 4.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wayne R. La Mura v. United States
United States v. Gottlieb, 712 F.2d 1363 , 1367 & n. 9 (11th Cir.1983); see also United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1036 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Texas Heart Institute
See also United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1035 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981). 17 In Powell, the Supreme Court set forth four requirements for enforcement of a summons: 18 [The Commissioner] must show that the investigation will be conducted pursuant to a legitimate purpose, that the inquiry may be relevant to the purpose, that the information sought is not already within the Commissioner's possession, and that the administrative steps required by the Code have been followed ... 19 Powell, 379 U.S. at 57-58 , 85 S.Ct. at 255 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Texas Heart Institute
See also United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1035 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. State of Washington
See, e.g., United States v. Washington (Lower Elwha Tribe), 459 F.Supp. 1020 , 1066 (1976), aff'd, 642 F.2d 1141 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 161 (1981). 4.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Willis
See also United States v. Davis, 636 F.2d 1028, 1043 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 862 , 102 S.Ct. 320 , 70 L.Ed.2d 162 (1981) (tax return preparation is “primarily an accounting service”).
Rice
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-100.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 5, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: E.D. Louisiana (1) · North Carolina Business Court (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.