green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. William L. McKnight and James W. Sturdevant
But see United States v. Horton, 646 F.2d 181, 189 (5th Cir.) (declining to review the legality of a sentence before trial court had been presented with a Rule 35 motion), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 388 (1981); United States v. Resnick, 483 F.2d 354, 358-59 (5th Cir.) (declining to review legality of a sentence before trial court had been presented with a Rule 35 motion) cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1008 , 94 S.Ct. 370 , 38 L.Ed.2d 246 (1973).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rafael E. Chirino v. National Transportation Safety Board and Secretary of Transportation
hen a defendant who has chosen not to testify subsequently comes forward to offer testimony exculpating a co-defendant, the evidence is not 'newly discovered
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David M. Dale, United States of America v. Michelle Ashton, United States of America v. Martin Segal, United States of America v. Automated Data Management, Inc., United States of America v. Terence Sweeney
See United States v. Reyes-Alvarado, 963 F.2d 1184, 1188 (9th Cir.1992) (" '[W]hen a defendant who has chosen not to testify comes forward to offer testimony exculpating a codefendant, the evidence is not "newly discovered." ' ") (quoting United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 740 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981)); United States v. Gustafson, 728 F.2d 1078, 1084 (8th Cir.) (finding no abuse of discretion in denying new trial motion based on probability that post-trial testimony of convicted co-defendants, who had agreed to provide government with in…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Dale
See United States v. Reyes-Alvarado, 963 F.2d 1184, 1188 (9th Cir.1992) (“ ‘[W]hen a defendant who has chosen not to testify comes forward to offer testimony exculpating a codefendant, the evidence is not “newly discovered.” ’ ”) (quoting United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 740 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981)); United States v. Gustafson, 728 F.2d 1078, 1084 (8th Cir.) (finding no abuse of discretion in denying new trial motion based on probability that post-trial testimony of convicted co-defendants, who had agreed to provide govern…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas W. Berthold
See United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 739-40 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Stephen Sneezer
(2×)
That is, evidence of prior crimes is not excluded unless its sole purpose is to "prove the character of a person to show action in conformity therewith." Fed.R.Evid. 404(b); accord United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 737 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Maria Dolores Rodriguez-De Pelayo
See United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 739-40 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Irby v. United States
Heard v. United States, 245 A.2d 125, 126 (D.C.1968); see United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 740 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981). 9 We find no abuse of discretion by the trial judge.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Patricia Corley
See United States v. Horton, 646 F.2d 181, 184 (5th Cir. Unit A), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 381 (1981); United States v. Caice *937 do-Asprilla, 632 F.2d 1161 , 1166 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1000 , 101 S.Ct. 1707 , 68 L.Ed.2d 201 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Greer
See United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 737-38 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Cray Stenberg, United States of America v. Loren Jay Ellison, United States of America v. Earl K. Fike, Jr.
When entrapment is raised as a defense, the defendant is exposed to “a searching inquiry into his own conduct and predisposition.” United States v. Reynoso-Ulloa, 548 F.2d 1329, 1341 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 436 U.S. 926 , 98 S.Ct. 2820 , 56 L.Ed.2d 769 (1978); see United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 737 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles William Lynch, United States of America v. Michael Robert Bauer
See United States v. Garcia, 647 F.2d 794, 795 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981); cf. United States v. Wilson, 665 F.2d 825, 828 (8th Cir.1981) (no abuse of discretion in foreclosing inquiry about witnesses’ releases to a halfway house and on bond pending trial respectively when defendant had cross-examined witnesses regarding favorable treatment and no such treatment was revealed), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 994 , 102 S.Ct. 2279 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1291 (1982). *771 V.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Aaron M. Binder and Frederick G. Celani
See United States v. Jones, 707 F.2d 1169,1172 (10th Cir.1983) (citing United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 735 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981)).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. McKoy
See United States v. Diggs, 649 F. 2d 731 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed. 2d 387 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
18 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 428, prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 10,840 Sarah Coursen and Katherine Cook v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation, Terri Johnson, Gayle McCann Laurie Jo Franz, Debbie Rohn, and Pamela Van Duyn v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc., a Virginia Corporation
See United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 737 (9th Cir.) (Rule 403 and 404), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981); United States v. Ford, 632 F.2d 1354, 1375 (9th Cir.1980) (Rule 404), rejected on other grounds, United States v. DeBright, 730 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc); Longenecker v. General Motors Corp., 594 F.2d 1283, 1286 (9th Cir.1979) (Rule 403).
discussed
Cited "see"
Coursen v. A.H. Robins Co.
See United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 737 (9th Cir.) (Rule 403 and 404), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981); United States v. Ford, 632 F.2d 1354, 1375 (9th Cir.1980) (Rule 404), rejected on other grounds, United States v. DeBright, 730 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc); Longenecker v. General Motors Corp., 594 F.2d 1283, 1286 (9th Cir.1979) (Rule 403).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kwong Shing So
See United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 739 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981); Reynoso, 548 F.2d at 1336 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter L. Mitchell, Jr.
See United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 736 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlin
See United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 740 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981); United States v. Gloria, 494 F.2d 477, 484 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 995 , 95 S.Ct. 306 , 42 L.Ed.2d 267 (1974); United States v. Jacobs, 475 F.2d 270 , 286 n. 33 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 821 , 94 S.Ct. 116 , 38 L.Ed.2d 53 (1973); United States v. Bujese, 371 F.2d 120, 124-25 (3d Cir.1967); McAteer v. United States, 148 F.2d 992, 993 (5th Cir.1945); Coplin v. United States, 88 F.2d 652, 665 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 301 U.S. 703 , 57 S.Ct. 929 , 81 L.E…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry Lee Rhodes, and Charles Dudley
See United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 739 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981); United States v. Hermosillo-Nanez, 545 F.2d 1230, 1232 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1050 , 97 S.Ct. 763 , 50 L.Ed.2d 767 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jeanne P. Johnson, Clarence A. Johnson
See United States v. Horton, 646 F.2d 181, 189 (5th Cir.) (remanding to district court for Rule 35 proceeding), cert, denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 388 (1981), 455 U.S. 919 , 102 S.Ct. 1274 , 71 L.Ed.2d 459 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ronald Boles, United States of America v. Robert J. Quinlan, United States of America v. Robert B. Quinlan
See United States v. Garcia, 647 F.2d 794 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981); United States v. Jackson, 549 F.2d 517, 524-25 (8th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Robinson
See e.g., United States v. Diggs, 649 F. 2d 731, 740 (9th Cir.1981), cert. den. 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed. 2d 387 (1981); United States v. Jacobs, 475 F. 2d 270, 286, n. 3 (2d Cir.1973), cert. den. 414 U.S. 821 , 94 S.Ct. 116 , 131, 38 L.Ed. 2d 53 (1973); United States v. Bujese, 371 F. 2d 120, 125 (3d Cir.1967); cf. State v. Schultheis, 113 N.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kevin Patrick McCourt
See also United States v. Hadley, 918 F.2d 848, 850 (9th Cir.1990) (“we have held that Rule 404(b) is an ‘inclusionary rule,’ under which evidence is inadmissible ‘only when it proves nothing but the defendant’s criminal propensities’ ”) (quoting United States v. Diggs, 649 F.2d 731, 737 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 970 , 102 S.Ct. 516 , 70 L.Ed.2d 387 (1981)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Garcia
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-556.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 2, 1981.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)
C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied.