green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
14.3 score
“the plaintiff to this very date ha not received any decision or determination on the issues raised at the hearing____”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Small v. Inhabitants of City of Belfast
(2×)
See Aitchison v. Raffiani, 708 F.2d 96, 100-103 (3d Cir.1983); but see Pauk v. Board of Trustees, 654 F.2d 856 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982); Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp., 613 F.2d 438 (2d Cir.1980); Pearman v. Walker, 512 F.Supp. 228 (D.R.I.1981). 2 .
discussed
Cited "but see"
Loengard v. Santa Fe Industries, Inc.
(2×)
But see Pauk v. Board of Trustees, 654 F.2d 856, 861 (2d Cir.1981) (action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , although not unknown prior to statute, governed by CPLR § 214(2)), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982); Staples v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc., 537 F.Supp. 1215, 1218 (W.D.N.Y.1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Williams v. King
the plaintiff to this very date ha not received any decision or determination on the issues raised at the hearing____
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Commonwealth v. Ellis
In discussing the rationale underlying the work product doctrine, the court stated that “(n]o court construing [the work produce doctrine] . . . has held that an attorney committing a crime could, by invoking the work product doctrine, insulate himself from criminal prosecution for abusing the system he is sworn to protect.” Id. at 1078; see also In Re Impounded Case (Law Firm), 879 F.2d 1211, 1214 (3rd Cir. 1989) (applying crime-fraud exception to opinion work product).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Douglas v. Dyn McDermott Petroleum Operations Co.
The Payne court stated “[i]f the defendant took adverse employment action against the plaintiff because of opposition conduct by the plaintiff that was outside the protection of the statute, then the defendant may have had a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason to justify its actions.” Id. at 1142 (emphasis added).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hodge v. Ruperto
New York, 654 F.2d 856 (2nd Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 5.Ct. 1631, 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ashcroft v. Southern California Permanente Medical Group
Cf. Sias v. City Demonstration 15 Agency, 588 F.2d 692 , 694–96 (9th Cir. 1978) (holding that retaliation claims may 16 succeed despite no underlying discriminatory practice having occurred, as retaliation 17 claims rely on actions taken in response to perceived discrimination rather than 18 discrimination itself); accord Payne v. McLemore’s Wholesale & Retail Stores, 654 F.2d 19 1130 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1000 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Parker v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.
(2×)
See Payne v. McLemore’s Wholesale & Retail Stores, 654 F.2d 1130, 1137 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1630 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982)(finding picketing in protest of discriminatory practices to be protected activity). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Regan
See In re John Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1079 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lucas v. People's Counsel for Baltimore County
(2×)
See City of Burbank v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority, 72 Cal.App.4th 366, 378 , 85 Cal.Rptr.2d 28 (Cal.App.2d Dist.1999). 27 In other words, “while a municipality may not control the source of the noise (the aircraft), it may use its police powers to mitigate the noise, such as the zoning power to assure harmonious development. ‘Congress has preempted only local regulation of the source of aircraft noise.’ ” Burbank, 72 Cal.App.4th at 379 , 85 Cal.Rptr.2d 28 , cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982) (citing San Diego Unified Port Disk v. Giant…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lewis v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n
(2×)
See Payne v. McLemore’s Wholesale and Retail Stores, 654 F.2d 1130, 1141 (5th Cir. Unit A Sept.1981) 3 (“Defendant’s failure to rehire the plaintiff was undoubtedly an adverse employment action” for purposes of Title VII) 4 , cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1630 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Amos v. Housing Authority of Birmingham Dist.
(2×)
See Payne v. McLemore’s Wholesale & Retail Stores, 654 F.2d 1130, 1137 (5th Cir. Unit A Sept. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1630 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rose Marie RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TANDEM COMPUTERS, INC., Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
See Payne v. McLemore’s Wholesale & Retail Stores, 654 F.2d 1130 n. 13 (5th Cir.1981) (allowing inference of causation based on employer's knowledge of activities and temporal proximity of this knowledge and the adverse action), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1630 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982). 24 .
discussed
Cited "see"
66 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 769, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,388 Victoria L. Trent, AKA Victoria L. Winebarger v. Valley Electric Association Inc. Richard Burasco Ross Dohlen
(2×)
See Payne v. McLemore's Wholesale & Retail Stores, 654 F.2d 1130, 1137-38 (5th Cir.1981) (employee belief that conduct being opposed was discriminatory must only be "reasonable") (quoting Hearth v. Metropolitan Transit Commission, 436 F.Supp. 685, 688-89 (D.Minn.1977)), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1630 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982); Sisco v. J.S.
discussed
Cited "see"
Trent v. Valley Electric Ass'n, Inc.
(2×)
See Payne v. McLemore’s Wholesale & Retail Stores, 654 F.2d 1130, 1137-38 (5th Cir.1981) (employee belief that conduct being opposed was discriminatory must only be “reasoriable”) (quoting Hearth v. Metropolitan Transit Commission, 436 F.Supp. 685, 688-89 (D.Minn.1977)), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1630 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982); Sisco v. J.S.
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. Joint School District No. 241
(2×)
“A district court abstaining under Pullman must dismiss the state law claim and stay its proceedings on the [federal] constitutional question until a state court has resolved the state issue." Cedar Shake & Shingle Bureau v. City of Los Angeles, 997 F.2d 620, 622 (9th Cir.1993); see Manney v. Cabell, 654 F.2d 1280, 1285 (9th Cir.1980) ("The district court should retain jurisdiction of the federal constitutional issues at the request of either party, pending proceedings in the state courts.”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1630 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982); Santa Pe Land Improv.
discussed
Cited "see"
Phyllis Wright Harris, on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Her Three Children Beverly Harris Butler, Formerly Beverly Harris Samuel Harris v. Joint School District No. 241 Board of Trustees of District No. 241 Trent Woods, Chairperson of Board Al Arnzen, Superintendent v. Citizens Preserving America's Heritage, Inc., an Idaho Corporation, Defendants-Intervenors-Appellees
(2×)
Knudsen Corp. v. Nevada State Dairy Comm'n, 676 F.2d 374 , 377 (9th Cir.1982) "A district court abstaining under Pullman must dismiss the state law claim and stay its proceedings on the [federal] constitutional question until a state court has resolved the state issue." Cedar Shake & Shingle Bureau v. City of Los Angeles, 997 F.2d 620, 622 (9th Cir.1993); see Manney v. Cabell, 654 F.2d 1280, 1285 (9th Cir.1980) ("The district court should retain jurisdiction of the federal constitutional issues at the request of either party, pending proceedings in the state courts."), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
Whitehead v. Nevada Commission on Judicial Discipline
(2×)
See In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073 , 1080 (4th Cir. 1981) (prima facie showing of illegal activity upon the part of the attorney was sufficient to overcome the work-product protection), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 (1982); Diamond v. Stratton, 95 F.R.D. 503, 506 (S.D.N.Y. 1982) (substantial need for documents shown where they shed direct light on motive and knowledge of defendant and counsel, and actions of counsel were an issue in the case); Donovan v. Fitzsimmons, 90 F.R.D. 583, 588 (N.D.
cited
Cited "see"
Hohenwater v. Roberts Pharmaceutical Corp.
See In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1081 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Blankman v. County of Nassau
(2×)
Cullen v. Margiotta, 811 F.2d 698 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1021 , 107 S.Ct. 3266 , 97 L.Ed.2d 764 (1987); accord Pauk v. Board of Trustees of City University of New York, 654 F.2d 856, 859 (2d Cir.1981) cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982); see also Wolf v. Wagner Spray Tech Corp., 715 F.Supp. 504, 509 (S.D.N.Y.1989) (“ ‘facts that should arouse suspicion ... are equated with actual knowledge of the claim’ ”) (citation omitted); Anisfeld v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., 631 F.Supp. 1461, 1465 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (knowledge may be imputed to a plaintiff by…
discussed
Cited "see"
Nos. 91-1873, 91-1874
See Doe v. United States (In re Doe), 662 F.2d 1073, 1078 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982). 91 Determining whether work product immunity is available requires a three step analysis.
discussed
Cited "see"
Leon v. Murphy
(2×)
See Cullen, 811 F.2d at 725 (quoting Pauk v. Board of Trustees of City Univ., 654 F.2d 856, 859 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leon v. Murphy
(2×)
See Cullen, 811 F.2d at 725 (quoting Pauk v. Board of Trustees of City Univ., 654 F.2d 856, 859 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982)).
cited
Cited "see"
Sandberg v. Virginia Bankshares, Inc.
See Doe v. United States (In re Doe), 662 F.2d 1073, 1078 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. of Mass. v. Mosbacher
See generally Carey v. Klutznick, 653 F.2d 732 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 999 , 102 S.Ct. 1630 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982); Tucker v. United States Dep’t of Commerce, 135 F.R.D. 175 (N.D.Ill.1991), appeal pending, No. 91-2051 (7th Cir.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alaska Airlines, Inc. Qwest Commuter Corp. Westair Incorporated v. City of Long Beach Long Beach City Council Evan Braude Wallace Edgerton Jan Hall Thomas J. Clark Ernie Kell James R. Wilson Eunice Sato Ed Tuttle Warren Harwood Ray Grabinski Marc A. Wilder, Long Beach Unified School District Long Beach Hugh, Inc., Defendants-Intervenors v. Pacific Southwest Airlines Aircal Inc. America West Airlines United Air Lines American Airlines, Inc. Ozark Airlines, Inc. Wings West Airlines, Inc. Federal Express Corporation Airserv Delta Air Lines, Inc. Continental Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees. Alaska Airlines, Inc. Qwest Commuter Corp. Westair Incorporated, and Pacific Southwest Airlines, Inc. Federal Express Corporation Airserv Aircal Inc. United Air Lines American Airlines, Inc. Ozark Airlines, Inc. Wings West Airlines, Inc., AKA American Eagle America West Airlines Delta Air Lines, Inc. Continental Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellees v. City of Long Beach Long Beach City Council, and Its Members
(2×)
See San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Gianturco, 651 F.2d 1306, 1316-17 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982) (ownership, operation, promotion and ability to acquire necessary approach easements comprise proprietorship of airport); see also Air Cal, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco, 865 F.2d 1112, 1117-18 (9th Cir.1989) (scope of proprietary powers). 22 Furthermore, we have held that the rationale for the exemption extends beyond purely financial concerns.
discussed
Cited "see"
Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. City of Long Beach
(2×)
See San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Gianturco, 651 F.2d 1306, 1316-17 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982) (ownership, operation, promotion and ability to acquire necessary approach easements comprise proprietorship of airport); see also Air Cal, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco, 865 F.2d 1112, 1117-18 (9th Cir.1989) (scope of proprietary powers).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mason v. Texaco, Inc.
See Vanskike v. ACF Indus., Inc., 665 F.2d 188 , 201-02 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982); National Business Lists, Inc. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 552 F.Supp. 99, 101 (N.D.Ill.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Babigian v. Association of the Bar
(2×)
See Pauk v. Board of Trustees, 654 F.2d 856, 859 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Babigian v. ASS'N OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NY
(2×)
See Pauk v. Board of Trustees, 654 F.2d 856, 859 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Essie Rollins v. State of Florida Department of Law Enforcement
(2×)
See Payne v. McLemore’s Wholesale & Retail Stores, 654 F.2d 1130, 1137 (5th Cir. Unit A Sept. 1981), 7 cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1630 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Martin Marietta Corporation, United States of America v. William C. Pollard
See In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073 , 1081 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cuomo v. Baldrige
(2×)
See Carey v. Klutznick, 653 F.2d 732 , 735 n. 10 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 999 , 102 S.Ct. 1630 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
In re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Litigation
See In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1079 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982); In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 604 F.2d 798, 801 (3d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Selzer v. Board of Education of New York
(2×)
See Pauk v. Board of Trustees of City University of New York, 654 F.2d 856, 861-66 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982); Rodriguez v. Chandler, 641 F.Supp. at 1296 .
examined
Cited "see"
Gladys Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company
(7×)
See Pauk v. Board of Trustees, 654 F.2d 856, 866 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 7l L.Ed.2d 866 (1982); Clark v. Musick, 623 F.2d 89, 92 (9th Cir.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Chandler
See Pauk v. Board of Trustees of the City University of New York, 654 F.2d 856, 862 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 86 (1982). 16 .
discussed
Cited "see"
B.T. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLAGSHIP INTERNATIONAL D/B/A Sky Chefs, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
Accord, Payne v. McLemore’s Wholesale & Retail Stores, 654 F.2d 1130 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1630 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Duhamel
See In re Doe, 662 F.2d 1073, 1080 (4th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Green v. Coughlin
(2×)
See Pauk v. Board of Trustees, 654 F.2d 856, 866 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dean J. Villante v. Department of Corrections of the City of New York, and Mens Queens House of Detention
(2×)
See Pauk v. Board of Trustees of City University, 654 F.2d 856, 866 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Saunders v. State of NY
(2×)
See Pauk v. Board of Trustees of City University of New York, 654 F.2d 856 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Debra Martenson
(2×)
Accord, In re Grand Jury Proceedings, 664 F.2d 423, 430 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Avagliano v. Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc.
(2×)
See Pauk v. Board of Trustees of CUNY, 654 F.2d 856, 861 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982); N.Y.Civ.Prac.Law and Rules (“CPLR”) § 214(2) (McKinney 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Laney v. Coleman Co.
See Vanskike v. ACF Industries, 665 F.2d 188 , 194-95 (8th Cir.1981) (applying Missouri law), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982); Jarrell v. Fort Worth Steel & Manufacturing Co., 666 S.W.2d 828, 834 (Mo.Ct.App.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Laney v. Coleman Company
See Vanskike v. ACF Industries, 665 F.2d 188 , 194-95 (8th Cir.1981) (applying Missouri law), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982); Jarrell v. Fort Worth Steel & Manufacturing Co., 666 S.W.2d 828, 834 (Mo.App.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tirolerland, Inc. v. Lake Placid 1980 Olympic Games, Inc.
(2×)
See Pauk v. Board of Trustees, 654 F.2d 856, 861, 866 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Anderson Banks v. Iron Hustler Corp.
See Vanskike v. ACF Industries, Inc., 665 F.2d 188, 195 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1632 , 71 L.Ed.2d 867 (1982); Capasso v. Minster Machine Co., Inc., 532 F.2d 952 (3d Cir.1976); Smith v. Verson Allsteel Press Co., 74 Ill.App.3d 818 , 30 Ill.Dec. 562 , 393 N.E.2d 598 (1979). *434 Thus, whether viewed in the context of a superseding cause or under any of the other standards employed to define “substantial change in condition” under § 402A, the issue as to both the negligence and strict liability counts was one for the jury.
examined
Cited "see"
Baksalary v. Smith
(4×)
The decision of a three-judge court is entitled to no more weight than any other district court decision." 481 F.2d at 1012 ; accord San Diego Unified Port District v. Gianturco, 651 F.2d 1306 , 1315 n. 24 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1000 , 102 S.Ct. 1631 , 71 L.Ed.2d 866 ] (1982); Mazer v. Weinberger, 385 F.Supp. 1321, 1324 (E.D.Pa.1974) (three-judge court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2282-2284 declining to follow previous three-judge court's decision), vacated on other grounds, 422 U.S. 1050 , 95 S.Ct. 2671 , 45 L.Ed.2d 704 (1975); Johnston v. Hodges, 372 F.Supp. 1015, 1020 (E.D.Ky.1974) …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McLemore's Wholesale & Retail Stores, Inc.
v.
Payne
v.
Payne
No. 81-986.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: E.D. New York (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.