green
Positive treatment
Circuit Split
Quoted verbatim 4×
11.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1990 ·
…because the secretary has no discretion to act, no purpose can be served by requiring him to prepare an eis, which is designed to insure that decisionmakers fully consider the environmental impact of a contemplated action.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 ·
…the act is based on the fundamental assumption that it is in the indian child's best interests that its relationship to the tribe be protected.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Donald Lee Noggle v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt.
(2×)
But see, Granviel v. Estelle, 655 F.2d 673, 679-83 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
People ex rel. J.L.P.
the act is based on the fundamental assumption that it is in the indian child's best interests that its relationship to the tribe be protected.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
People in Interest of JLP
the act is based on the fundamental assumption that it is in the indian child's best interests that its relationship to the tribe be protected.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Todd Goos v. Interstate Commerce Commission
because the secretary has no discretion to act, no purpose can be served by requiring him to prepare an eis, which is designed to insure that decisionmakers fully consider the environmental impact of a contemplated action.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Goos v. Interstate Commerce Commission
because the secretary has no discretion to act, no purpose can be served by requiring him to prepare an eis, which is designed to insure that decisionmakers fully consider the environmental impact of a contemplated action.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Daniel Arceneaux, Louis Daverede, Jr., Vives Lemmon and Jules Menesses v. Amstar Corp., Amstar Sugar Corp., Tate and Lyle North American Sugars, Inc., and Domino Sugar Company
Id. at 1038.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
A.W. Chesterton Co. v. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
The court’s “continuous trigger” approach, which defines bodily injury as occurring continually during “any part of the single injurious process that asbestos-related diseases entail,” id. at 1047, mirrors that stipulated to by the parties in this case.
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. California Union Insurance
(4×)
Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 (1982). 7 Id. at 1044. 8 Id. at 1046. 9 Id. at 1047. 10 See id. at 1041; see also Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 633 F.2d 1212 , 1222 (6th Cir. 1980). 11 See Forty-Eight Insulations at 1222. 12 126 Wis. 2d 242 , 376 N.W.2d 84 (Ct. App. 1985). 13 Id. at 250 , 376 N.W.2d at 87 . 14 Welter, 126 Wis. 2d at 251 , 376 N.W.2d at 87 (emphasis added). 15 Sec. 802.08(2), Stats. 16 Sec. 802.08(3), Stats, (emphasis added). 17 Preloznik v. City of Madison, 113 Wis. 2d 112 , 116, 334 N.W.2d 580 , 583 (Ct. App. 1983). 18 In oral argument on t…
cited
Cited "see"
Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness v. Dombeck
See State of Minnesota By Alexander v. Block, 660 F.2d 1240, 1245 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1645 , 71 L.Ed.2d 876 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness Wilderness Watch Sawbill Outfitters, Inc. Izaak Walton League of America the Wilderness Society Wilderness Inquiry, Inc. v. Michael P. Dombeck, as Chief of the United States Forest Service Daniel Glickman, as Secretary of Agriculture, County of St. Louis, County of Lake, County of Cook, National Association of Canoe Liveries and Outfitters, Conservationists With Common Sense, Ely Outfitters Association, Grand Marais Gunflint Trail Outfitters Association, Harvey G. Solberg v. Michael P. Dombeck, Chief of the U.S. Forest Service Daniel Glickman, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Wilderness Inquiry, Inc. Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness Wilderness Watch Sawbill Trail Outfitters Association, Intervenors-Appellees
See State of Minnesota By Alexander v. Block, 660 F.2d 1240, 1245 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1645 , 71 L.Ed.2d 876 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Manufactured Housing Communities v. State
See Minnesota by Alexander v. Block, 660 F.2d 1240, 1256 (8th Cir. 1981) (statute granting federal government right of first refusal not a taking even if some diminution in value results), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 (1982); Kaiser Dev.
cited
Cited "see"
Celotex Corp. v. AIU Insurance Co. (In Re Celotex Corp.)
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am. 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981) cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1645 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec, Ltee. v. American Home Assur.
cited
Cited "see"
CNA Lloyds of Texas v. St. Paul Insurance Co.
See Keene Cory. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1042 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 1645, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Northern States Power Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047-49 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1645 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982), reh'g denied, 456 U.S. 951 , 102 S.Ct. 2024 , 72 L.Ed.2d 476 (1982). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Gulf Chemical & Metallurgical Corp. v. Associated Metals & Minerals Corp.
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1050-52 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 -45, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); id. at 1058 (Wald, J., concurring); Budd Co. v. Travelers Indem.
discussed
Cited "see"
American Red Cross v. Travelers Indemnity Co.
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1041 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 reh’g denied, 456 U.S. 951 , 102 S.Ct. 2024 , 72 L.Ed.2d 476 (1982); Owens-Illinois, 597 F.Supp. at 1522 . 4 In determining the “objectively reasonable” reading of the policy, the Court must give effect to the policy’s dominant purpose of indemnity.
cited
Cited "see"
Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1041 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
North East Insurance v. Northern Brokerage Co.
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of No. America, 667 F.2d 1034 , 1040 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 . 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Mueller v. Healthplus, Inc.
See generally Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North Am., 215 U.S.App.D.C. 156, 165 , 667 F.2d 1034 , 1043 (1981) (where lack of clarity in insurance contract, applying general principles interpreting contract in favor of the insured under contingent event vested right the *440 ory), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Elmer M. Kunkel, William H. Dennler, John D. Lockton, Ted B. Westfall and William D. Robertson v. Continental Casualty Company
We explained: “The contingent nature of the right or obligation in controversy will not bar a litigant from seeking declaratory relief when the circumstances reveal a need for a present adjudication.” Id. at 594; accord Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1039-40 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Taylor Bay Protective Ass'n v. Ruckelshaus
See, State of Minnesota by Alexander v. Block, 660 F.2d 1240, 1259 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1645 , 71 L.Ed.2d 876 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Commercial Union Insurance
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981) (asbestosis), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 633 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir.1980) (asbestosis), modified on rehearing, 657 F.2d 814 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 686 , 70 L.Ed.2d 650 (1981); Porter v. American Optical Corp., 641 F.2d 1128 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 686 , 70 L.Ed.2d 650 (1981) (asbestosis); Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Insurance Co., 482 N.E.2d 467 (Ind.1985) (DES…
cited
Cited "see"
Commercial Union Insurance Co., Counter-Claim-Defendant v. Sepco Corp., Counter-Claim-Plaintiff, Third-Party v. United National Insurance Co., Third-Party
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Commercial Union Insurance v. Sepco Corp.
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
ACandS, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1043-44 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Acands, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company and the Travelers Indemnity Company and the Travelers Insurance Company v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1043-44 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982). 19 The phrase "bodily injury" has also been interpreted by four courts of appeals in this very context, i.e., on the issue of trigger of coverage under comprehensive general liability policies in asbestos-related personal injury actions.
discussed
Cited "see"
Sanchez v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.
(2×)
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Puritan Life Insurance Co. v. Guess, 598 P.2d 900 (Alaska 1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Johns-Manville Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 , 1038 n. 3 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Emons Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
See Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 513 F.Supp. 47, 49 (D.D.C.), rev’d, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Gaf Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America
See, generally, Keene Corporation v. Insurance Co. of North America, 513 F.Supp. 47 , on appeal, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981) cert. denied 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See e.g., Free Enterprise, supra (quoting Minnesota v. Block, 660 F.2d 1240 , 1249 (8th Cir. 1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 1007 (1982) to the effect that: ". . . this authority [under the Property Clause] to protect public land . . . must extend to regulation of conduct on or off the public land that would threaten the designated purpose of federal lands"); United States v. Richard, 636 F.2d 236 , 240 (8th Cir. 1980), cert denied 450 U.S. 1033 (1981) ("federal regulation may exceed federal boundaries when necessary"); United States v. Lindsey, 595 F.2d 5 (9th Cir. 1979) ("It is well established…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Koppers Company, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company Zurich Insurance Company the Travelers Indemnity Co. The American Home Assurance Company Commercial Union Insurance Company the Home Insurance Company Underwriter's at Lloyd's of London. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Certain Insurance Companies in the London Market, Referred to in This Action as \Jackson and Companies\"
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1047-50 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 1645, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Dayton Indep.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Koppers Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am,., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1047-50 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 1645, 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Dayton Indep.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yavapai-Apache Tribe v. Mejia
See also In re Appeal in Pima County, 130 Ariz. 202 , 635 P.2d 187, 189 (Ariz.Ct.App.1981), cert. denied by Catholic Social Services of Tucson v. P.C., 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Note, Indian Child Welfare: A Jurisdictional Approach, 21 Ariz. L.Rev. 1123, 1123 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
SCSC Corp. v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.
Id. at 1411 ; see also Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1048 (D.C.Cir.1981) (“There is nothing in the policies that provides for a reduction of the insurer’s liability if an injury occurs only in part during a policy period”) (emphasis in original), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Doctors' Co. v. Insurance Corp. of America
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Transamerica Insurance Company v. Ronald M. South, Roy W. Brunsmann, Walter E. Jones, Kathleen Jones, and Iris L. Hannon
See also Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1040 (D.C.Cir.1981) (upholding declaratory judgment regarding duty to defend and indemnify in cases not yet filed), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); ACandS, Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Fairchild Industries
Indeed, litigation over insurance coverage has become the paradigm for asserting jurisdiction despite "future contingencies that will determine whether a controversy ever actually becomes real." 10A Wright & Miller, supra, at 586; see, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1039-40 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); ACandS, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 666 F.2d 819, 822-23 (3d Cir.1981); see also G.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.
Indeed, litigation over insurance coverage has become the paradigm for asserting jurisdiction despite “future contingencies that will determine whether a controversy ever actually becomes real.” 10A Wright & Miller, supra, at 586; see, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1039-40 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); ACandS, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 666 F.2d 819, 822-23 (3d Cir.1981); see also G.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)
See Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty Eight Insulations, Inc., 657 F.2d 814, 816 (6th Cir.) (trigger for insurance coverage exposure because ‘bodily injury’ occurs when asbestos victims first starts breathing asbestos fibers), cert denied, 454 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 686 , 70 L.Ed.2d 650 (1981); see also Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047 (D.C.Cir.1981) (term “bodily injury” in comprehensive liability policies means “any part of the single injurious process that asbestos-related disease entails”), cer t. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 7…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carey Canada, Inc. v. California Union Insurance
Compare Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047 (D.C.Cir.1981), cer t. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982) (continuous trigger applies because bodily injury caused by asbestos begins with inhalation of fibers and ends with manifestation); accord Phase V-A Decision, supra, at 15 (“The continuous trigger adopted ... in the bodily injury cases was based upon a finding that bodily injury from asbestos exposure was a continuous process beginning with first exposure.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of N. Am., 667 F.2d 1034 , 1051-52 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Insurance Co. of N. Am. v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., 451 F.Supp. 1230 (E.D.Mich.1978), aff'd, 633 F.2d 1212 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1109 , 102 S.Ct. 686 , 70 L.Ed.2d 650 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982) (asbestos-related diseases); Lac D’Amiante Du Quebec v. American Home Insurance, 613 F.Supp. 1549 (D.N.J.1985) (asbestos-related diseases); Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. *768 Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 597 F.Supp. 1515 (D.D.C.1984); Vale, supra, (DES-related diseases).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Monsanto Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
See e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, D.C.Cir., 667 F.2d 1034, 1041 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. Bergen v. Lawrence
See also Minnesota v. Block, 660 F.2d 1240 , 1249 & n. 18 (8th Cir.1981) (Congressional power extends to conduct “on or off the public land”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1645 , 71 L.Ed.2d 876 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lawrence
See also Minnesota v. Block, 660 F.2d 1240 , 1249 & n. 18 (8th Cir.1981) (Congressional power extends to conduct "on or off the public land"), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1645 , 71 L.Ed.2d 876 (1982). 27 Second, we can find nothing of Lawrence's that has been "taken." Certainly, his federal grazing leases are not damaged as a portion of the animal unit months ("AUMs") for those leases is reserved for wildlife, presumably including antelope.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Insurance Companies v. Northeastern Pharmaceutical & Chemical Co.
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1047 (D.C.Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982) (Date of occurrence is the continuous period from exposure to manifestation.). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clemtex, Inc. v. Southeastern Fidelity Insurance Company
Compare Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc. and Porter with, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1045 (D.C.Cir.1981) (multiple trigger theory), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982), and Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 682 F.2d 12, 24 (1st Cir.1982) (manifestation theory), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1028 , 103 S.Ct. 1279 , 75 L.Ed.2d 500 (1983), and American Home Products Corp. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 748 F.2d 760, 764 (2d Cir.1984) (injury in fact as trigger).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vale Chemical Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Keene Corp. v. Insurance Company of North America, 667 F.2d 1034 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982); Eli Lilly v. Home Insurance Co., No. 82-0669, (D.D.C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Frederick F. Petersen, Deceased, and Mary Jane Petersen, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Frederick F. Petersen, Cross-Appellants v. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Cross-Appellee, and Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Third-Party v. Armstrong Cork Company, the Celotex Corporation, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation, Owens-Illinois Glass Company, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., and Garlock, Inc., Third- Party
See also Keene Corp. v. Insurance Co. of North America, 667 F.2d 1034, 1040 (D.C.Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1007 , 102 S.Ct. 1644 , 71 L.Ed.2d 875 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
v.
Granviel
v.
Granviel
No. 81-1011.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 8, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (2) · Colorado Court of Appeals (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.