green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.2 score
“it is now well established that any rule of reason analysis requires a showing of anti-competitive market effect. to hold otherwise would ignore the very purpose of the antitrust laws which were enacted for the protection of competition, not competitors.”
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 49 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Robert's Hawaii School Bus, Inc. v. Laupahoehoe Transportation Co.
a subsequent failure to achieve monopoly status cannot itself vitiate a claim of attempted monopoly where other evidence substantially supports the attempt without eviscerating the entire attempt offense.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Judith Nelson and Darci Anne Bowman, Cross-Appellees v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, Formerly Known as the Monroe Clinic, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
it is now well established that any rule of reason analysis requires a showing of anti-competitive market effect. to hold otherwise would ignore the very purpose of the antitrust laws which were enacted for the protection of competition, not competitors.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
White and White, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.
umerous courts have found a market share of 30 or higher to be insufficient, by itself, to prove a dangerous probability of monopolization (citing cases)
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Complaint Against Judge Harper
See Davis v. Williams (C.A.5, 1980), 617 F.2d 1100 , certiorari denied (1980), 449 U.S. 937 , 101 S.Ct. 336 , 66 L.Ed.2d 160 (upholding constitutionality of fire department regulation prohibiting conduct prejudicial to good order), and Vorbeck v. Schnicker (C.A.8, 1981), 660 F.2d 1260 , certiorari denied (1982), 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (declining jurisdiction because of lack of actual case and controversy, while indicating that police regulations, like military regulations, are generally cast in broad terms).
cited
Cited "see"
Advanced Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Giles Memorial Hospital
See Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 270-71 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Busby v. City Of Orlando
See Vorbeck v. Schnicker, 660 F.2d 1260, 1262 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Busby v. City of Orlando
See Vorbeck v. Schnicker, 660 F.2d 1260, 1262 (8th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Baker's Aid, a Division of M. Raubvogel Co. v. Hussmann Foodservice Co.
See Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 267 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); Alders v. AFA Corp. of Florida, 353 F.Supp. 654, 658 (S.D.Fla.1973), aff'd without opinion, 490 F.2d 990 (5th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Flanagan v. Munger
See Vorbeck v. Schnicker, 660 F.2d 1260, 1262 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982) (prohibition against vagueness applies to administrative regulations as well as statutes). .
examined
Cited "see"
G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
(3×)
See Lektro-Vend Corporation v. Vendo Company, 660 F.2d 255 , 269-70 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982). *1473 (1) Elements of Claims 58.
cited
Cited "see"
Martin v. Sargent
See Vorbeck v. Schnicker, 660 F.2d 1260, 1265 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Martin v. Sargent
See Vorbeck v. Schnicker, 660 F.2d 1260, 1265 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
In re Basto
See Application of Carden, 291 Or. 515 , 635 P.2d 341 (1981), cert. den. 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
All American Life And Casualty Company v. Oceanic Trade Alliance Council International
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 788 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Martinez, 604 F.2d 361, 366 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 708 , 62 L.Ed.2d 671 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
All American Life & Casualty Co. v. Oceanic Trade Alliance Council International, Inc.
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 788 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Martinez, 604 F.2d 361, 366 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 708 , 62 L.Ed.2d 671 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Charles W. Leigh and Ervin F. Dusek, Etc., and George Johnson, Intervening v. Clyde William Engle
See Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 262-63 (7th Cir.1981) (review of mixed, findings and “paper” cases), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul W. Granville
See United States v. Sedigh, 658 F.2d 1010, 1015 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982); cf. United States v. Dorr, 636 F.2d 117, 121 (5th Cir.1981) (in assessing prejudice to defendant from prosecutor’s closing argument, jury instruction may be considered).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael Becker v. Egypt News Company, Inc.
See Auburn News Co. v. Providence Journal Co., 659 F.2d 273, 278 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); Hardin v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co., 434 F.Supp. 54, 56 (S.D.Tex.1977); Lamarca v. Miami Herald Publishing Co., 395 F.Supp. 324, 327 (S.D.Fla.1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rex C. Cauble, Individually and Doing Business as Cauble Enterprises
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786 (5th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2). 30 .
cited
Cited "see"
Multiflex, Inc. v. Samuel Moore & Company, and Eaton Corporation
See Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 270 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982) and cases cited.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth Joe Whitten, John Elmer Gaiefsky, Jack Wayne Gish, Richard Lawrence Shimel
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 787-89 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) (evidence of a large number of calls between a narcotics buyer and defendant who was identified as the seller sufficient to establish a violation of § 843(b)); United States v. Cooper, 606 F.2d 96, 98 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 685 , 62 L.Ed.2d 657 (1980) (testimony that witness sent several money orders and that some of the money used for heroin sufficient to support a conviction on two counts of § 843(b)).
discussed
Cited "see"
John E. Breen, J.D. Malkemus, R.B. Lewis, J.D. Griffin and Jeannie F. Graham v. Centex Corporation
See Rufenacht v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 492 F.Supp. 877 (N.D.Tex.1980), affirmed, 656 F.2d 198 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 ; see also Moore Fed.Pract. ¶ 0.416[2] at 2231 n. 10 and cases cited therein.
cited
Cited "see"
Laurence J. Gordon, Inc. v. Brandt, Inc.
See Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 271-72 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. David L. Mack
See United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 789 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lopez Quinonez v. Puerto Rico National Guard
Inc. v. SprintCom, Inc., 287 F.3d 1, 9 (1st Cir.2002); see also Auburn News Co. v. Providence Journal Co., 659 F.2d 273, 277 (1st Cir.1981) (“[T]he probability-of-suecess component has loomed large in cases before this court”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); LeBeau v. Spirito, 703 F.2d 639, 645 (1st Cir.1983) (affirming denial of preliminary injunction and ending inquiry after concluding that plaintiffs were unlikely to prevail on the merits).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State of Missouri v. Cuffley
"The basic inquiry is whether the 'conflicting contentions of the parties ... present a real, substantial controversy between parties having adverse legal interests, a dispute definite and concrete, not hypothetical or abstract.' " Babbitt v. United Farm Workers Nat'l Union, 442 U.S. 289, 298 , 99 S.Ct. 2301, 2308 , 60 L.Ed.2d 895 (1979) (quoting Railway Mail Ass'n v. Corsi, 326 U.S. 88, 93 , 65 S.Ct. 1483, 1487 , 89 L.Ed. 2072 (1945)); see also Vorbeck v. Schnicker, 660 F.2d 1260, 1266 (8th Cir.1981) (noting that only "a definite and concrete controversy" satisfies the requirements of Article…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Missouri Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Cuffley
“The basic inquiry is whether the ‘conflicting contentions of the parties ... present a real, substantial controversy between parties having adverse legal interests, a dispute definite and concrete, not hypothetical or abstract.’ ” Babbitt v. United Farm Workers Nat’l Union, 442 U.S. 289, 298 , 99 S.Ct. 2301, 2308 , 60 L.Ed.2d 895 (1979) (quoting Railway Mail Ass’n v. Corsi, 326 U.S. 88, 93 , 65 S.Ct. 1483, 1487 , 89 L.Ed. 2072 (1945)); see also Vorbeck v. Schnicker, 660 F.2d 1260, 1266 (8th Cir. 1981) (noting that only “a definite and concrete controversy” satisfies the requir…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. v. Straach
See e.g., United States v. Sedigh, 658 F.2d 1010, 1014 (5th Cir. 1981 Unit A), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 (1982); United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301, 1305 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied Nelson v. United States, 113 S. Ct. 355 (1992) (each case applies abuse of discretion standard of review).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gary Eugene Straach
See e.g., United States v. Sedigh, 658 F.2d 1010, 1014 (5th Cir.1981 Unit A), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982); United States v. Webster, 960 F.2d 1301, 1305 (5th Cir.1992), cert. denied Nelson v. United States, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 355 , 121 L.Ed.2d 269 (1992) (each case applies abuse of discretion standard of review).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Augusta News Co. v. News America Publishing, Inc.
See also Auburn News Co., Inc. v. Providence Journal Co., 659 F.2d 273, 277 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Reardon v. United States
See also Auburn News Co., Inc. v. Providence Journal Co., 659 F.2d 273, 277 (1st Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kukla v. Village of Antioch
See, e.g., Vorbeck v. Schnicker, 660 F.2d 1260, 1263 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982); Byrd v. Gain, 558 F.2d 553, 554 (9th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1087 , 98 S.Ct. 1282 , 55 L.Ed.2d 792 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Football League v. National Football League
(2×)
See, e.g., Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. Gross, 563 F.2d 1057, 1082 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1035 , 98 S.Ct. 769 , 54 L.Ed.2d 782 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fred B. Shelton Iii, and John Paul Jones, Cross v. City of College Station, Cross-Appellants
See, e.g., Couf v. DeBlaker, 652 F.2d 585, 587-90 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1278 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1981); Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285, 1289 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 885 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980); Blackman v. City of Big Sandy, 507 F.2d 935, 936 (5th Cir.1975); Nasser v. City of Homewood, 671 F.2d 432, 441 (11th Cir.1982); Rogin v. Bensalem Township, 616 F.2d 680, 689 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1029 , 101 S.Ct. 1737 , 68 L.Ed.2d 223 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Caldwell
Compare United States v. Brantley, 733 F.2d 1429, 1439-40 (11th Cir.1984) with United States v. Sedigh, 658 F.2d 1010, 1013-14 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921, 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Indiana Federation of Dentists, an Unincorporated Association v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
See also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255 , 265 n. 11 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Shell Oil Co., 626 F.2d 549, 555 (7th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Advisory Information & Management Systems, Inc. v. Prime Computer, Inc.
See also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Corp., 660 F.2d 255 , 271 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982) (and citations); United States v. Empire Gas Corp., 537 F.2d 296, 305-07 (8th Cir. 1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1122 , 97 S.Ct. 1158 , 51 L.Ed.2d 572 (1977); Terry’s Floor Fashions v. Burlington Industries, 568 F.Supp. 205, 214 (E.D.N.C.1983). 7 Prime’s maximum market share of 25 percent in 1983 had stabilized from the year before.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Federal Trade Commission v. Warner Communications Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 274 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James R. French v. Jinright & Ryan, P.C. Architects
See also, Rufenacht v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc., 656 F.2d 198 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 462 (1982); Stovall v. Price Waterhouse Co., 652 F.2d 537 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981); Port Arthur Towing Co. v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 492 F.2d 688 , 692 n. 6 (5th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Association For Intercollegiate Athletics For Women v. National Collegiate Athletic Association
See also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 273 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982) ("[An] intent to triumph in the competitive market, in the absence of unfair, anticompetitive or predatory conduct, is not enough to establish an antitrust violation." (quoting Hayes v. Solomon, 597 F.2d 958, 977 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1078 , 100 S.Ct. 1028 , 62 L.Ed.2d 761 (1980)) 12 AIAW argues that the district court, even in the absence of direct evidence of specific intent, should have inferred this intent for attempted monopolizati…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Association for Intercollegiate Athletics for Women v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n
See also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 273 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982) ("[An] intent to triumph in the competitive market, in the absence of unfair, anticompetitive or predatory conduct, is not enough to establish an antitrust violation.” (quoting Hayes v. Solomon, 597 F.2d 958, 977 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1078 , 100 S.Ct. 1028 , 62 L.Ed.2d 761 (1980)). .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League
See Kaplan, 611 F.2d at 291 ; see also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 268-269 (7th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission v. National Football League, an Unincorporated Association, Defendants/cross-Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees, and New England Patriots Football Club, Inc., Highwood Service, Inc., Empire Sports, Inc., Houston Oilers, Inc., New York Jets Football Club, Inc., and Chargers Football Company, Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc., and Miami Dolphins, Ltd., Defendants/cross-Defendants-Appellants, and Los Angeles Rams Football Co., Defendant/cross-Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee, and Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum, Inc., Intervenor/defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Oakland Raiders, Ltd., Cross-Claimant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
See Kaplan, 611 F.2d at 291 ; see also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 268-269 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R. Anthony Marrese and Michael R. Treister v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
(2×)
See, e.g., Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 274 (7th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982); Hayes v. Solomon, 597 F.2d 958, 984 (5th Cir.1979), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1078 , 100 S.Ct. 1028 , 62 L.Ed.2d 761 (1980); Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway & Park District of Peoria, 583 F.2d 378, 379 (7th Cir.1978) (per curiam), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 1090 , 99 S.Ct. 873 , 59 L.Ed.2d 57 (1979); Abramson v. Pennwood Investment Corp., 392 F.2d 759, 762 (2d Cir.1968).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Organization of Minority Vendors, Inc. v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad
See also Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 268 (7th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aydin Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Loral Corporation, a New York Corporation, and Conic Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F.2d 255, 264-65 (7th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982) (noncompetition covenants ancillary to sale of business); Bradford v. New York Times Co., 501 F.2d at 59-60 (post-employment noncompetition agreement).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
National Football League v. North American Soccer League
See, e. g., Lektro-Vend Corp. v. Vendo Co., 660 F. 2d 255 (CA7 1981), cert. denied, 455 U. S. 921 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rhea Lucky Nichols and Michael Ford, A/K/A L.D. Haufer
See, e.g., United States v. Lerma, 657 F.2d 786, 788 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1279 , 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982); United States v. Martinez, 604 F.2d 361, 366 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1034 , 100 S.Ct. 708 , 62 L.Ed.2d 671 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gweldon Lee Paschall and All Intervenors v. The Kansas City Star Company
See also Auburn News Co. v. Providence Journal Co., 659 F.2d 273, 278 (1st Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 921 , 102 S.Ct. 1277 , 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lektro-Vend Corp.
v.
Vendo Co.
v.
Vendo Co.
No. 81-1007.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 25, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.