green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
10.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1990 ·
…even where arguably mixed with questions of law, is subject to attack only if clearly erroneous.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Mark A. Maragh
(2×)
even where arguably mixed with questions of law, is subject to attack only if clearly erroneous.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Daniel Thomas
even where arguably mixed with questions of law, is subject to attack only if clearly erroneous
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Larsen
Anderson v. Anderson (In re Anderson), 936 F.2d 199, 204 (5th Cir.1991); In re Saturley, 131 B.R. at 517 ; see In re Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Arlan’s Dep’t Stores, Inc., 615 F.2d 925 (2d Cir.1979); see generally In re Cuisine Magazine, Inc., 61 B.R. 210 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1986) (strict disclosure requirements provide the court with the opportunity to examine the integrity of the professionals involved and to give interested parties an opportunity to object).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Begun
See In re Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982) (compensation for special counsel denied for failing to disclose all connections with attorneys for the debtor); In re EWC, Inc., 138 B.R. 276 (Bankr.W.D.Okla.1992) (attorney for debtor was denied compensation and required to disgorge previously received sum for failing to disclose his concurrent representation of the debtor’s sole shareholder in a divorce action); In re Marine Outlet, Inc., 135 B.R. 154 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1991) (special counsel was required to forfeit all …
cited
Cited "see"
Cohn v. U.S. Trustee (In Re Ostas)
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin, 655 F.2d 463, 468-71 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied sub. nom, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Peoples Savings Corp.
See In re Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Hargis, 73 B.R. 622 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.1987); In re Bobroff, 64 B.R. 308 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1986); In re Lewis, 30 B.R. 404 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1983); In re Morton Shoe Cos., 22 B.R. 449 (Bankr.D.Mass.1982); In re Byman Furniture & Interiors, Inc., 14 B.R. 230 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Huether
See United States v. Kendall, 655 F.2d 199 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1434 , 71 L.Ed.2d 652 (1981); United States v. Jackson, 544 F.2d 407 (9th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re French
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Smith v. Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts (In re Sapphire Steamship Lines, Inc.), 509 F.2d 1242, 2245-46 (2d Cir.1975); In re Progress Lektro Shave Corp., 117 F.2d 602, 604 (2d Cir.1941); General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Updike (In re H.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Rosen
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Progress Lektro Shave Corp., 117 F.2d 602, 604 (2d Cir.1941); In re Cuisine Magazine, Inc., 61 B.R. 210 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y. 1986); In re Sapolin Paints, Inc., 38 B.R. 807 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1984); In re Ochoa, 74 B.R. 191 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Command Services Corp.
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Progress Lektro Shave Corp., 117 F.2d 602, 604 (2d Cir.1941); In re Cuisine Magazine, Inc., 61 B.R. 210 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.1986); In re Sapolin Paints, Inc., 38 B.R. 807 (Bankr.E.D.N.Y.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Northeast Dairy Cooperative Federation, Inc.
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Smith v. Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts (In re Sapphire Steamship Lines, Inc.), 509 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (2d Cir.1975); In re Progress Lektro Shave Corp., 117 F.2d 602, 604 (2d Cir.1941); General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Updike, (In re H.L.
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Cuisine Magazine, Inc.
See Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Ingram v. State
See United States v. Kendall, 655 F.2d 199, 201-02 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1434 , 71 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); United States v. Jackson, 544 F.2d 407 (9th Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Jensen-Farley Pictures, Inc.
See Matter of Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Illinios v. Associated Milk Producers Inc.
See In re Beef (argument permitted) and Zinser v. Continental Grain Co., 660 F.2d 754, 761 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1434 , 71 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982) (court disagrees with use of "functional equivalent" argument); Midwest Paper Products Co. v. Continental Group, Inc., 596 F.2d 573 , 578 (3rd Cir.1979) (argument disallowed); see also Comment, A Legal and Economic Analysis of the Cost Plus Contract Exception in Hanover Shoe and Illinois Brick, 47 U.Chi.L.Rev. 743 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lynette Burnette, United States of America v. Theresa Burnette, United States of America v. Michael Curtis Burnette
(2×)
See United States v. Kendall, 655 F.2d 199 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1434 , 71 L.Ed.2d 652 (1981); United States v. Canady, 615 F.2d 694 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 165 , 66 L.Ed.2d 78 (1980); United States v. Jackson, 544 F.2d 407 (9th Cir.1976). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mazzei v. Winnecour (In re Mazzei)
Sommer eds., 15th ed. rev. 2007); see also Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 470 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Crafts Retail Holding Corp.
See, e.g., Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Smith v. Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts (In re Sapphire S.S.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McCrary & Dunlap Construction Co. v. Mendes & Gonzales PLLC
Applying the willfulness standard in Downs, we affirmed the judgment of the district court, which ordered complete disgorgement of fees and was based on a finding that debtor’s counsel had demonstrated a “callous disregard” for the duties imposed by the Code and Rules by “affirmatively ... concealing] his fee arrangement.” Id. at 479-80 ; see also Futuronics v. Arutt (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 466-68, 471 (2d Cir.1981) (requiring complete denial of all compensation and disgorgement of all fees received for flagrant violation of fiduciary obligations exhibiting a callous …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coan v. Hutter (In Re Hutter)
See, e.g., Matter of Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Rainbow Press of Fredonia, 197 B.R. 428, 429 (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.1996); In re Piecuil, 145 B.R. 777 (Bankr.W.D.N.Y.1992).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Bennett Funding Group, Inc.
See, e.g., Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Smith v. Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts (In re Sapphire Steamship Lines, Inc.), 509 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (2d Cir.1975); General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Updike (In re H.L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Crivello
See, e.g., Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981) (construing former Bankruptcy Rules 215 and 219), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1485 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Michigan General Corp., 78 B.R. 479 (Bankr.N.D.Tex.1987), aff'd in part and rev’d in part, 88 B.R. 773 (N.D.Tex.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re 245 Associates, LLC
See, e.g., Futuronics Corp. v. Arutt, Nachamie & Benjamin (In re Futuronics Corp.), 655 F.2d 463, 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); Smith v. Winthrop, Stimson, Putnam & Roberts (In re Sapphire Steamship Lines, Inc.), 509 F.2d 1242, 1245-46 (2d Cir.1975); In re Progress Lektro Shave Corp., 117 F.2d 602, 604 (2d Cir.1941); In re Rogers-Pyatt Shellac Co., 51 F.2d 988, 991 (2d Cir.1931); In re Robotics Resources R2, Inc., 117 B.R. at 62 ; In re French, 111 B.R. 391, 394 (Bankr.N.D.N.Y.1989); In re Northeast Dairy Co-op.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In the Matter of Daisy M. Prudhomme and John and Kathleen Batten, Debtors. John F. Arens v. Al Boughton, Trustee
See 11 U.S.C. §§ 327 , 1107(a) (requiring court approval before debtor-in-possession may employ counsel); id. § 330(a) (requiring court approval of professional fees); Woods v. City Nat’l Bank & *1004 Trust Co., 312 U.S. 262, 268 , 61 S.Ct. 493, 497 , 85 L.Ed. 820 (1941) (using denial of compensation as tool for strict enforcement of conflict-of-interest rules); Anderson v. Anderson (In re Anderson), 936 F.2d 199, 204 (5th Cir.1991) (recognizing bankruptcy court’s broad discretion as court of equity to grant or deny fees and noting that attorney has no absolute right to fee award absent…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Grabill Corp. v. Pelliccioni
See also In re Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Morton Shoe Cos., 22 B.R. 449 (Bankr.D.Mass.1982); In re Byman Furniture & Interiors, Inc., 14 B.R. 230 (Bankr.S.D.Tex.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. of Chicago v. Charles N. Wooten, Ltd. (In re Evangeline Refining Co.)
See, e.g., Matter of Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463, 470-71 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Endeco Inc., 675 F.2d 166, 167 (8th Cir.1982); Matter of Arlan’s Dept.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In The Matter Of Evangeline Refining Company
See, e.g., Matter of Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463, 470-71 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Endeco Inc., 675 F.2d 166, 167 (8th Cir.1982); Matter of Arlan's Dept.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Nana Daly's Pub, Ltd.
See, e.g., In re Futuronics, 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (denied compensation to attorneys for debt- or-in-possession due to failure to disclose fee arrangements and certain relatively minor payments); In re Arlan’s Dept.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Mahone
See, e.g., United States v. Kendall, 655 F.2d 199 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 (1982); United States v. Miller, 589 F.2d 1117 (1st Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 958 (1979); United States v. Colbert, supra. We agree with the federal courts and hold that under the Hawaii Constitution, Article I, Section 7, the same rule of law is applicable to the facts of this case.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Daig Corp.
Minn.1981); see also Matter of Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Sapolin Paints Inc., 38 B.R. 807 (Bktcy.E.D.N.Y.1984); In re Morton Shoe Companies, Inc., 22 B.R. 449 (Bktcy.D.Mass.1982). .This is equally true as to services rendered subsequent to a professional person’s termination by the debtor.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Ex Rel. Kraft v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
See also In re Futuronics Corp., 655 F.2d 463 , 469 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In re Rene Press, 23 B.R. 381, 383 (Bankr.D.Mass.1982), vacated on other grounds, 29 B.R. 446 (Bankr. 1st Cir.1983); In re Holiday Mart, Inc., 18 B.R. 212, 215-16 (Bankr.D.Hawaii 1982); In re Morton Shoe, 22 B.R. at 450 ; In re Garland Corp., 8 B.R. 826, 828 (Bankr.D.Mass.1981); In re McAuley Textile Corp., 11 B.R. 646, 648 (Bankr.D.Me.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Devers
See, e.g., In Re Futuronics Corporation, 655 F.2d 463 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1435 , 71 L.Ed.2d 653 (1982); In Re Arlan’s Department Store, Inc., 615 F.2d 925 (2d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Delphine O. Tolbert
See, e.g., United States v. Kendall, 655 F.2d 199 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 941 , 102 S.Ct. 1434 , 71 L.Ed.2d 652 (1982); United States v. Berd, 634 F.2d 979 (5th Cir.1981); United States v. Canady, 615 F.2d 694 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 862 , 101 S.Ct. 165 , 66 L.Ed.2d 78 (1980); United States v. Colbert, 474 F.2d 174 (5th Cir.1973) (en banc); cf. United States v. Washington, 677 F.2d 394, 396 (4th Cir.1982) (although stating that it was not an abandonment case, the court concluded that where a defendant specifically denied ownership of a suitcase, agents “could …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Tabcor Sales Clearing, Inc.
v.
Department of the Treasury
v.
Department of the Treasury
No. 81-979.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (3)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.