green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
11.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1990 ·
…absent an abuse of discretion, a reviewing court may not disturb the judgment of the district court respecting the introduction, presentation or exclusion of evidence ...
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 45 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Layton
But cf. United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 889-90 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Kaiser, 660 F.2d 724, 731-32 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 956 , 102 S.Ct. 1467 , 71 L.Ed.2d 674 and 457 U.S. 1121 , 102 S.Ct. 2935 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1333 (1982).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Steven Harold Erikson v. James R. Rowland
the judge's conclusion about the effect of the alleged juror misconduct deserves substantial weight.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Delbert Bowling (89-5595), and Idell Bowling (89-5618)
(2×)
absent an abuse of discretion, a reviewing court may not disturb the judgment of the district court respecting the introduction, presentation or exclusion of evidence ...
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Donald Robert Schramm
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 888 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Javier Barraza v. James Gomez, Director of Corrections for the State of California
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 888 (9th Cir.1981) (jury presumed to be rational), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Raymond Swinton
See United States v. Bag *382 nariol, 665 F.2d 877, 885 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982) (noting that where trial court learns of possible juror misconduct, it must hold evidentiary hearing to determine precise nature of extraneous information); United States v. Rhodes, 556 F.2d 599, 602 (1st Cir.1977) (stating that denial of motion for new trial without any investigation of exposure to extraneous materials was insufficient response to serious matters raised in affidavit); cf. United States v. Cheyenne, 855 F.2d 566, 568 (8th Cir.1988) (statin…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bruce Swinton
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 885 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 (1982) (noting that where trial court learns of possible juror misconduct, it must hold evidentiary hearing to determine precise nature of extraneous information); United States v. Rhodes, 556 F.2d 599, 602 (1st Cir. 1977) (stating that denial of motion for new trial without any investigation of exposure to extraneous materials was insufficient response to serious matters raised in affidavit); cf. United States v. Cheyenne, 855 F.2d 566, 568 (8th Cir. 1988) (stating district court properly conducted e…
cited
Cited "see"
Tennant v. Marion Health Care Foundation, Inc.
See United States Gypsum Co. v. Schiavo Bros., Inc., 668 F.2d 172 (3rd Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 961 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Estrada, Also Known as Taco Estrada, United States of America v. Daniel Greg Dossett
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 888-89 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Manfred Westphal, Husband Orietta Westphal v. Steven Rubisch, D.D.S.
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877 (9th Cir.1981) (no new trial though juror did outside research about a company at stake in the litigation), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 (1982); Hard v. Burlington Northern R.R., 870 F.2d 1454 (9th Cir.1989) (no new trial though juror may have told other jurors about his experience as an employee of the defendant's predecessor company and about his familiarity with X-rays, which were one piece of evidence). 8 Plaintiffs' cite two cases in which the Ninth Circuit has granted new trials in light of juror misconduct.
examined
Cited "see"
Autran v. State
(4×)
See State v. Geraldo, 68 Ohio St.2d 120 , 429 N.E.2d 141 , 145 fn. 5 (1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 486 (1982); Dixon v. State, 737 P.2d 942 (Okla.Crim.App.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Department of Revenue v. There to Care, Inc.
(2×)
See United States v. Bagnariol (9th Cir.1981), 665 F.2d 877, 896 , cert. denied, Bagnariol v. United States (1982), 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (scheme to liberalize state gambling laws had sufficient effect on interstate commerce to satisfy jurisdictional requirements of various federal criminal statutes); Gulch Gaming, Inc. v. State of South Dakoto (D.S.D.1991), 781 F.Supp. 621, 626 (requirement that corporations applying for gaming license be owned in the majority by South Dakota residents violated the commerce clause); National Ass'n of Fundraising Ticket Mfrs. v. Humphr…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Melvin Turner
See Martin v. Weaver, 666 F.2d 1013 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 (1982) (noting that the trial court has broad discretion to determine the scope of rebuttal testimony); United States v. Butcher, 926 F.2d 811, 817 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 2273 (1991); United States v. Moody, 903 F.2d 321, 330 (5th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Josuf Papraniku, AKA Sofi, United States of America v. Shaban Dobrova
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 881-83 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 (1982) (tracing the development of the doctrine in this circuit as well as in the Supreme Court).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jesse Arzate
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 881-83 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 (1982) (tracing the development of the doctrine in this circuit as well as in the Supreme Court).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sara Lee Boling, United States of America v. James F. Ray
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 881-83 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 (1982) (tracing the development of the doctrine in this circuit as well as in the Supreme Court).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nordberg v. Arab Banking Corp. (In re Chase & Sanborn Corp.)
In our system of justice, absent defects in the original proceedings, a party gets only one trial to prove its claims; the record cannot be reopened merely “to introduce evidence that was available at trial but was not proffered, to relitigate old issues, to advance new theories, or to secure a rehearing on the merits.” Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 791 F.2d 1207, 1219 (5th Cir.1986); accord United States Gypsum Company v. Schiavo Brothers, Inc., 668 F.2d 172, 180 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982); McGregor Boulevard Church of Christ v. Wa…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard George Maree, United States of America v. Joseph Brooks
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 884-85 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); Abatino v. United States, 750 F.2d 1442, 1446 (9th Cir.1985); Dickson v. Sullivan, 849 F.2d 403, 406 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
George Lee Hughes v. R.G. Borg
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 887 (9th Cir.1981) (suggesting that overwhelming evidence may be sufficient to uphold a conviction even in the presence of extraneous material), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Tebha, 770 F.2d 1454, 1456 (9th Cir.1985) (where other evidence against defendant “was far from overwhelming,” court was constrained to reverse because of extraneous material); cf. United States v. McKinney, 434 F.2d 831, 832-33 (5th Cir.1970) (affirming defendant’s conviction, despite presence of extraneous influen…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1987 Ford Aerostar Minivan
See Martin v. Weaver, 666 F.2d 1013, 1020 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Bermuda Express v. Litsa Ex. Laurie
See In re Bankers Trust Co., 658 F.2d 103 , 108 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Bermuda Express v. M/V Litsa
See In re Bankers Trust Co., 658 F.2d 103, 108 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Walter D. Brodie, United States of America v. Nancy A. Brodie
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 885 (9th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Langford, 802 F.2d 1176, 1180 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 3235 , 97 L.Ed.2d 740 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George Dadanian and Jean Dadanian
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 899 (9th Cir.1981) (per curiam), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.
See United States Gypsum Co. v. Schiavo Bros., Inc., 668 F.2d 172, 180 (3d Cir.1981) (“the trial record must support whatever additional findings of fact or conclusions of law a party seeks under Rule 52(b) or it is certainly not entitled to them”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrew Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co., Defendant-Third Party Cross-Appellant, Cross-Appellee v. Rowandrill, Inc., Defendant-Third Party Cross-Appellant, Cross-Appellee v. Bristow Offshore Helicopters, Inc., Third Party Cross
See United States Gypsum Co. v. Schiavo Bros., Inc., 668 F.2d 172, 180 (3d Cir.1981) ("the trial record must support whatever additional findings of fact or conclusions of law a party seeks under Rule 52(b) or it is certainly not entitled to them"), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982). 70 Under the circumstances of this case, we cannot fault the District Court for denying Bristow's motion.
discussed
Cited "see"
Evan Lee Deakle, Jr. v. John E. Graham & Sons, a Corp. M/v Clara G., Her Engines, Hull, Tackle, Cargo and Appurtenances Thereof
See In re Complaint of Bankers Trust Co., 658 F.2d 103 , 112 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982); Arco Pipeline Co. v. SS Trade Star, 693 F.2d 280, 281 (3d Cir. 1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Deerfield Commodities, Ltd. v. Nerco, Inc.
See United States Gypsum Co. v. Schiavo Bros., Inc., 450 F. Supp. 1291, 1302 (E.D.Pa. 1978), new trial granted 485 F. Supp. 46 (E.D.Pa. 1979), aff'd. in part, rev'd in part 668 F.2d 172 (3d Cir.1981), cert. den. 456 U.S. 961 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Association of Recycling Industries, Inc., Plaintiffs v. American Mail Line, Ltd.
See Yellow Forwarding Co. v. Atlantic Container Line, 498 F.Supp. 105 (E.D.Mo.1980), aff’d, 668 F.2d 350 (8th Cir.1981), cert. de *620 nied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2039 , 72 L.Ed.2d 486 (1982); Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc., 1976-2 Trade Cas.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Valdovinois-Valdovinois
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 882 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Prairie, 572 F.2d at 1319 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Moreno Ramirez, United States of America v. Robert H. Reynolds
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 881-83 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982) (tracing development of the defense both in this circuit and in the Supreme Court).
cited
Cited "see"
Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. William F. Smith, Attorney General. Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Philip Shiff Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Acton Corporation Appeal of Anthony R. Martin-Trigona. Anthony Gwara v. William F. Smith, U.S. Attorney General Peter N. Georgiades v. Helen Martin-Trigona. Appeal of Anthony R. Martin-Trigona. Peter N. Georgiades v. Helen Martin-Trigona, Anthony R. Martin-Trigona v. Federal Communications Commission, Capital Cities Communications, Inc., Intervenor
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 892-93 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Martin-Trigona v. Smith
See United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 892-93 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James (\Jake\") Rohrer
Fed.R.Evid. 606(b); United States v. Freedson, 608 F.2d 739, 741 (9th Cir.1979); see generally United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 883-89 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Rose Hall Ltd. v. Chase Manhattan Overseas Banking Corp.
See Matter of Bankers Trust Co., 658 F.2d 103 , 108 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982); EM.
cited
Cited "see"
Dravo Mechling Corp. v. Standard Terminals, Inc.
See In re Bankers Trust Co., 658 F.2d 103, 108 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kramer
See also United States Gypsum v. Schiavo, 485 F.Supp. 46, 55 (E.D.Pa.1979), aff'd in part, rev in part, 668 F.2d 172 (3d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 961 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982); United States v. Kikumura, 947 F.2d 72, 77 (3d Cir.1991) (“[U]nder the law of the case doctrine, when a court decides upon a rule of law, that decision should continue to govern the same issues in subsequent stages in the same case.”) (citing Christianson v. Colt Indus.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Fogg v. MacAluso
(4×)
See, e.g., Martin v. Weaver, 666 F.2d 1013 , 1018 n. 1 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982); Lingo v. Hoekstra, 176 Ohio St. 417 , 27 O.O.2d 384 , 200 N.E.2d 325 , 328 (1964); see generally, W.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nos. 90-16623, 90-16624
See, e.g., United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 890-91 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982). 11 The district court dismissed the RICO counts under the mistaken belief that Rae v. Union Bank, 725 F.2d 478 (9th Cir.1984), requires that a RICO enterprise "must be an entity separate and distinct from the defendants." Memorandum of Decision and Order at 7.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
River City Markets, Inc. v. Fleming Foods West, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 890-91 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People ex rel. M.N.
There is both federal and state authority recognizing the proposition that “governmental over involvement, if ‘outrageous,’ will bar prosecution of a defendant on the ground of deprivation of due process even if he is ‘predisposed.’ ” State v. Hohensee, 650 S.W.2d at 271 ; see also United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Fekri, 650 F.2d 1044 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373 (3d Cir.1978); Batres-Santolino, 521 F.Supp. 744 ; Isaacson, 44 N.Y.2d 511 , 378 N.E.2d …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People in Interest of MN
There is both federal and state authority recognizing the proposition that "governmental over involvement, if `outrageous,' will bar prosecution of a defendant on the ground of deprivation of due process even if he is `predisposed.'" State v. Hohensee, 650 S.W.2d at 271 ; see also United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); United States v. Fekri, 650 F.2d 1044 (9th Cir.1981); United States v. Twigg, 588 F.2d 373 (3d Cir.1978); Batres-Santolino, 521 F.Supp. 744 ; Isaacson, 44 N.Y.2d 511 , 378 N.E.2d 78 , 406 N.Y.…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lockwood v. a C & S, Inc.
See, e.g., United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877 , 884 n.3 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 (1982); Keyes v. Amundson, 343 N.W.2d 78, 86-87 (N.D. 1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The Republic of the Philippines v. Ferdinand E. Marcos, Imelda R. Marcos, Ramon Azurin, Diosdado C. Ordonez and Ancor Holdings, N.V.
(2×)
See also United States v. Bagnariol, 665 F.2d 877, 892 (9th Cir.1981) (effect on commerce is an essential element of a RICO violation), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2040 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mary Rodriguez v. Olin Corporation, and Third Party v. Hunter Chemicals, Inc., Smith Valve Corporation, Third Party
(2×)
See also Martin v. Weaver, 666 F.2d 1013, 1020 (6th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 962 , 102 S.Ct. 2038 , 72 L.Ed.2d 485 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Weaver
v.
Martin, Administrator
v.
Martin, Administrator
No. 81-1678.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 3, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Sixth Circuit (2) · Ninth Circuit (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.