green
Positive treatment
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lancaster Cty. C & Y Social Srvcs. Agency v. DHS
Cmwlth. v. Penn, 439 A.2d 1154, 1159 (Pa.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980 14 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Lehane
See Kines v. Butterworth, 669 F.2d 6, 9 (1st Cir.1981) (government interference with defendant’s right to interview witnesses violates due process), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2250 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Singleton
See Kines v. Butterworth, 669 F.2d 6, 9 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2250 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982); United States v. White, 454 F.2d 435, 438 (7th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 962 , 92 S.Ct. 2070 , 32 L.Ed.2d 350 (1972); United States v. Fink, 502 F.2d 1 (5th Cir.1974), rev’d on other grounds, 425 U.S. 80 , 96 S.Ct. 1330 , 47 L.Ed.2d 592 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Stokes
See, Commonwealth v. Penn, 497 Pa. 232 , 439 A.2d 1154 (1982), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2251 , 72 L.Ed.2d 857 (1982), (impeachment of witness limited to prior convictions of a crimen falsi nature); Commonwealth v. Randall, 515 Pa. 410 , 528 A.2d 1326 (1987), (impeachment of a defendant limited to prior convictions of crimen falsi nature).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Tejeda, United States of America v. Paul Christian
See Arboleda, 929 F.2d at 868 (“ ‘[n]o right of a defendant is violated when a potential witness freely chooses not to talk....’”) (quoting Kines v. Butterworth, 669 F.2d 6, 9 (1st Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2250 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roach v. Zimmerman
See Commonwealth v. Penn, 497 Pa. 232 , 439 A.2d 1154 , cert. denied 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2251 , 72 L.Ed.2d 857 (1982) (prior conviction for robbery involved dishonesty); Commonwealth v. Henderson, 497 Pa. 23 , 438 A.2d 951 (1981) (prior convictions for theft and robbery were admissible to impeach credibility); Commonwealth v. Thomas, 484 Pa. 383 , 399 A.2d 128 (1979) (impeachment of defendant with larceny conviction proper); Commonwealth v. Kahley, 467 Pa. 272 , 356 A.2d 745 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1044 , 97 S.Ct. 746 , 50 L.Ed.2d 757 (1976) (impeachment of defense witness with prior con…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
See Kines v. Butterworth, 669 F.2d 6, 9 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2250 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982) (”[n]o right of a defendant’s violated when a potential witness freely chooses not to talk; a witness may of his own free will refuse to be interviewed by either the prosecution or the defense”). 33 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Sherwood
See also Commonwealth v. Penn, 497 Pa. 232 , 439 A.2d 1154, 1159 (1982), cert. denied, Penn v. Pennsylvania, 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2251 , 72 L.Ed.2d 857 (1982) (holding that child’s statement was admissible under excited utterance exception even though statement was not made immediately after incident and was the product of questioning).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Carlos Arboleda, United States v. Martin Castillo, United States v. Jecennia C. Orellana
See also Kines v. Butterworth, 669 F.2d 6, 10-11 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2250 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State Ex Rel. Upham v. Bonebrake
See, e.g., Kines v. Butterworth, 669 F2d 6, 9 (1st Cir 1981), cert den 456 US 980 (1982); United States v. Scott, 518 F2d 261, 268 (6th Cir 1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Louise White v. Dorothy Arn
See, e.g., Carter v. Jago, 637 F.2d 449, 455 (6th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2249 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982); Hooper v. Perini, 641 F.2d 445, 446 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 817 , 102 S.Ct. 95 , 70 L.Ed.2d 86 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kennedy v. State
See, e.g., Kines v. Butterworth, 669 F.2d 6 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2250 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982); United States v. Mayo, 705 F.2d 62 *291 (2nd Cir.1983); United States v. Walton, 602 F.2d 1176 (4th Cir.1979); United States v. Caldwell, 750 F.2d 341 (5th Cir.1984) cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1007 , 105 S.Ct. 1873 , 85 L.Ed.2d 166 (1985); United States v. Scott, 518 F.2d 261 (6th Cir.1975); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arnold L. King v. Joseph Ponte
See, e.g., Kines v. Butterworth, 669 F.2d 6, 11-12 (1st Cir.1981) (State court remedies have been exhausted when that court had an opportunity to consider and correct the constitutional defect.) (quoting Picard v. Con *641 nor, 404 U.S. 270, 276 , 92 S.Ct. 509, 512 , 30 L.Ed.2d 438 (1971)), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 980 , 102 S.Ct. 2250 , 72 L.Ed.2d 856 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reed
v.
Webster
v.
Webster
No. 81-6417.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 17, 1982.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.