green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Childress v. Johnson
See Bradbury v. Wainwright, 658 F.2d 1083, 1087 (5th Cir. Unit B Oct. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2275 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1288 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kline A. Gowen
See United States v. Mathis, 668 F.2d 1157, 1160-61 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2275 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1288 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarence Evans
See United States v. Saint Prix, 672 F.2d 1077, 1083 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982) (defendant argued that sales slips bearing his name for vans used to move marijuana should have been excluded as hearsay; the court stated that “the sales slips were not admitted to prove that [defendant] bought the vans.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Braj Nandan Singh
(2×)
Accord United States v. Saint Prix, 672 F.2d 1077 , 1082 n. 10 (2d Cir.) (“ ‘border search’ exception does not justify searches of homes or business establishments”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Jimmy F. Smith v. O.L. McCotter Director, Texas Department of Corrections
See Bradbury v. Wainwright, 658 F.2d 1083, 1086 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2275 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1288 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Carr
See Bradbury v. Wainwright, 658 F.2d 1083, 1087-88 (5th Cir. 1981) (unit B), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2275 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1288 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Leonard O. Diaz, Jr. v. T.C. Martin, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution
See authorities cited supra notes 7-9 17 Bradbury v. Wainwright, 658 F.2d 1083, 1087 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2275 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1288 (1982); Herring v. Estelle, 491 F.2d at 127 ; Walker v. Caldwell, 476 F.2d 213 (5th Cir.1973) 18 Calloway v. Powell, 393 F.2d 886 (5th Cir.1968) 19 Lamb v. Estelle, 667 F.2d 492 (5th Cir.1982); Bradbury v. Wainwright, 658 F.2d at 1087 20 Jones v. Estelle, 622 F.2d 124, 127 (5th Cir.1980); Easter v. Estelle, 609 F.2d 756, 759 (5th Cir.1980); Carbo v. United States, 581 F.2d 91, 93 (5th Cir.1978) 21 Washington v. Strickland, 693 F.2d 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rahmaan v. United States
Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335, 344 (1980) (citations omitted); see also Bradbury v. Wainwright, 658 F.2d 1083, 1087 (Sth Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 (1982) (guilty plea waiver does not extend to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel that attack the voluntariness of the plea).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
King v. State
Rather, the key to satisfying [Federal Evidence] Rule 803(6) in this context is whether an employee was "able in some way to verify the information provided-for example, by examining a credit card, driver's license, or other form of identification." United States v. Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95, 101 (2d Cir.1980). "[Ilf such verification is obtained by the employee, we see no reason why the guest card that has been filled in by the guest himself would not qualify as a business record and thus be admissible for the truth of its statements." Id.; see also United States v. Saint Prix, 672 F.2d 1077, 10…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nathaniel Mathes v. United States
Slaughter v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2084 , 104 L.Ed.2d 648 (1989); United States v. Jordan, 810 F.2d 262, 264 (D.C.Cir.) (citing United States v. Lemonakis,, 485 F.2d 941, 948 (D.C.Cir.1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 989 , 94 S.Ct. 1586 , 39 L.Ed.2d 885 (1974)), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1032 , 107 S.Ct. 1963 , 95 L.Ed.2d 535 (1987); see also United States v. Saint Prix,, 672 F.2d 1077, 1083 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); United States v. Bruner, 657 F.2d 1278, 1284-85 (D.C.Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Orlando Zapata
Rather, the key to satisfying Rule 803(6) in this context is whether an employee was “able in some way to verify the information provided— for example, by examining a credit card, driver’s license, or other form of identification.” United States v. Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95, 101 (2d Cir.1980). “[I]f such verification is obtained by the employee, we see no reason why the guest card that has been filled in by the guest himself would not qualify as a business record and thus be admissible for the truth of its statements.” Id.; see also United States v. Saint Prix, 672 F.2d 1077, 1084 (2d…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cochran v. State
See also United States v. Saint Prix , 672 F.2d 1077 , 1084 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 992 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 (1982); McNeary v. Stone , 482 F.2d 804 , 806 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1071 , 94 S.Ct. 584 , 38 L.Ed.2d 478 (1973).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Saint Prix
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 81-1975.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 24, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.