green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
cited
Cited "see"
New England Dragway, Inc. v. M-O-H Enterprises, Inc.
See Sharon Steel Corp. v. Insurance Commissioner of New Hampshire, 458 U.S. 1101 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Michael T. Wilburn v. Maritrans Gp Inc
(2×)
See Scott v. Plante, 641 F.2d 117, 136 (3d Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds, 458 U.S. 1101 , 102 S.Ct. 3474 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1362 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Wilburn v. Maritrans GP Inc
See Scott v. Plante, 641 F.2d 117, 136 (3d Cir. 1981), vacated on other grounds, 458 U.S. 1101 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Webb v. Heckler
Accord Rosofsky v. Schweiker, 523 F.Supp. 1180, 1184 (E.D.N.Y.1981), appeal dismissed 457 U.S. 1141 , 102 S.Ct. 3474 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1361 (1982). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Posnack v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
See Rosofsky v. Schweiker, 523 F.Supp. 1180, 1188 (E.D.N.Y.1981), appeal dismissed, 457 U.S. 1141 , 102 S.Ct. 3474 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1361 (1982) (court not strictly bound by 20 C.F.R. § 404.509 in determining equity and good conscience).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kazan v. Wolinski
See Scott v. Plante, 641 F.2d 117, 136 (3d Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. —, 102 S.Ct. 3474 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1362 (1982); Perzeproski v. American President Lines, Ltd., 319 F.Supp. 1329, 1330 (E.D.Pa.1970).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kazan v. Wolinski
See Scott v. Plante, 641 F.2d 117, 136 (3d Cir.1981), vacated on other grounds, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. 3474 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1362 (1982); Perzeproski v. American President Lines, Ltd., 319 F.Supp. 1329, 1330 (E.D.Pa.1970). 19 Kazan argues that the district court impermissibly considered the jury's mid-deliberation note in determining whether the evidence could support a verdict of $150,000. 2 We do not agree.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
BRADFORD-WHITE CORPORATION, Appellant in 88-1781 v. ERNST & WHINNEY; BRADFORD-WHITE CORPORATION, v. ERNST & WHINNEY, Appellant in 88-1828
(2×)
We therefore will vacate the judgment of the district court and will remand the case for entry of judgment....”); see also Scott v. Plante, 641 F.2d 117, 124-25 (3d Cir.1981) (“[sjince the defendants did not in the trial court object to the form of the interrogatories either before or after the verdict, and do not on appeal argue that they were prejudiced by the way the questions were formulated, we must read them in a manner which reconciles them with the jurors’ probable intention in light of the Court’s instructions.”), vacated on other grounds, 458 U.S. 1101 , 102 S.Ct. 3474 , 73…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Woe v. Cuomo
(2×)
See, e.g., Scott v. Plante, 641 F.2d 117 (3d Cir.1981), vacated and remanded, 458 U.S. 1101 , 102 S.Ct 3474 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1362 , on remand, 691 F.2d 634 (3d Cir.1982); Welsch v. Likins, 373 F.Supp. 487 (D.Minn.1974), partially vacated on other grounds, 550 F.2d 1122 (8th Cir.1977); Wyatt v. Stickney, supra; Davis v. Watkins, 384 F.Supp. 1196 (1974), supplemented sub nom.
Graham
v.
New York
v.
New York
No. 80-6397.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 28, 1982.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 3d Jud. Dept. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Judgment vacated and case remanded for further consideration in light of United States v. Johnson, 457 U. S. 537 (1982).