green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Toste Farm Corp. v. Hadbury, Inc.
(2×)
See Martin v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc., 665 F.2d 598 (5th Cir.) (stating Louisiana law), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1122 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982); Perry v. M.M.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gospel Missions of America v. Bennett
(2×)
See Fernandes v. Limmer, 663 F.2d 619, 628 (5th Cir. Unit A Dec. 1981), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1124 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1395 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Holloway v. Wittry
See Corriz v. Naranjo, 667 F.2d 892, 898 (10th Cir.1981), cert. granted, 456 U.S. 971 , 102 S.Ct. 2233 , 72 L.Ed.2d 844 , cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1123 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Complaint for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability of Shell Oil Co.
See, Martin v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc., 665 F.2d 598 , 602 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1122 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982), vacating the district court's judgment that plaintiff lacked standing to pursue an antitrust claim against defendants and stating: The trial court dismissed the suit under Rule 12(b), but did not specify whether the dismissal was under 12(b)(1), lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or 12(b)(6), failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nicolls Pointing Coulson, Ltd. v. Transportation Underwriters of Louisiana, Inc.
See Martin v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc., 665 F.2d 598, 603-04, n. 3 (5 Cir.) cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1122 , *496 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982); Jefferson County Pharmaceutical Association, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 656 F.2d 92, 98 (5 Cir.1981), rev’d on other grounds, 460 U.S. 150 , 103 S.Ct. 1011 , 74 L.Ed.2d 882 , reh'g denied, 460 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 1808 , 76 L.Ed.2d 371 (1983); Kershaw v. Kershaw Manufacturing Co., 209 F.Supp. 447 (M.D.Ala.1962), aff'd, 327 F.2d 1002 (5 Cir.1964). 5 Thus, the Fifth Circuit has indicated that it perceives no inconsistency in saying on the one…
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul S. Dopp v. Htp Corporation, Paul S. Dopp v. Htp Corporation, Paul S. Dopp v. Htp Corporation, Island Resorts, S.A.
See Corriz v. Naranjo, 667 F.2d 892, 896 (10th Cir.1981) (objection to sufficiency of § 1983 damages claim held inadequate to preserve for review issue of whether damage award was duplicative), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1123 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982); Fed.R.Civ.P. 51; see also CVD, Inc. v. Raytheon Co., 769 F.2d 842, 858-59 (1st Cir.1985) (to preserve objection to jury instructions for appeal, aggrieved party must distinctly state the ground of objection before the jury retires), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); Jordan v. U.S. Lines, Inc., 738…
discussed
Cited "see"
FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas
(2×)
See Dumas v. City of Dallas, 648 F.Supp. 1061 (N.D.Tex.1986). . 380 U.S. 51 , 85 S.Ct. 734 , 13 L.Ed.2d 649 (1965). . 663 F.2d 619 (5th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1124 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1395 (1982). .Id. 380 U.S. at 58-59 , 85 S.Ct. at 738-39 . . 663 F.2d at 628 . . 427 U.S. 50 , 96 S.Ct. 2440 , 49 L.Ed.2d 310 (1976). . 475 U.S. 41 , 106 S.Ct. 925 , 89 L.Ed.2d 29 (1986). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Group W Cable, Inc. v. City of Santa Cruz
(2×)
See Fernandes v. Limmer, 663 F.2d 619, 633 (5th Cir.1981), cert, denied, 458 U.S. 1124 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1395 (1982); Baldwin v. Redwood City, 540 F.2d 1360, 1371 (9th Cir.1976), cert, denied, 431 U.S. 913 , 97 S.Ct. 2173 , 53 L.Ed.2d 223 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Ortega v. City of Kansas City, Kansas
Accord Corriz v. Naranjo, 667 F.2d 892, 898 (10th Cir.1981), cert. dis missed, 458 U.S. 1123 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
The People Of The State Of Illinois v. Life Of Mid-America Insurance Company
See Martin v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc., 665 F.2d 598, 604 (5th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1122 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982) (stating the general rule "that the question of whether a person is a real party in interest under Rule 17(a) is decided by the substantive law of the forum which created the right being sued upon"); White Hall Building Corp. v. Profexray Division of Litton Industries, Inc., 387 F.Supp. 1202, 1204 (E.D.Pa.1974); Rackley v. Board of Trustees, 35 F.R.D. 516, 517 (D.S.C.1964); see also Carter v. Berger, 777 F.2d 1173 (7th Cir.1985). 6 The RICO statute provides…
discussed
Cited "see"
Illinois v. Life of Mid-America Insurance
See Martin v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc., 665 F.2d 598, 604 (5th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1122 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982) (stating the general rule “that the question of whether a person is a real party in interest under Rule 17(a) is decided by the substantive law of the forum which created the right being sued upon”); White Hall Building Corp. v. Profexray Division of Litton Industries, Inc., 387 F.Supp. 1202, 1204 (E.D.Pa.1974); Rackley v. Board of Trustees, 35 F.R.D. 516, 517 (D.S.C.1964); see also Carter v. Berger, 777 F.2d 1173 (7th Cir.1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Walje v. City of Winchester
See Corriz v. Naranjo, 667 F.2d 892, 897-98 (10th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1123 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982); Herrera v. Valentine, 653 F.2d 1220, 1227-31 (8th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walje v. City Of Winchester
See Corriz v. Naranjo, 667 F.2d 892, 897-98 (10th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1123 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982); Herrera v. Valentine, 653 F.2d 1220, 1227-31 (8th Cir.1981). 9 In the present case, we are confronted with a violation of the First Amendment guarantee of free speech and association.
cited
Cited "see"
Sygma Photo News, Inc. v. Globe International, Inc.
See Martin v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc., 665 F.2d 598, 604-05 (5th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1122 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lavicky v. Burnett
See Corriz v. Naranjo, 667 F.2d 892, 897 (10th Cir. 1981), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1123 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982); Smith v. Heath, 691 F.2d 220, 226 (6th Cir.1982); cf. Hostrop v. Board of Junior College, District No. 515, 523 F.2d 569, 579 (7th Cir.1975) (citing cases awarding damages in civil rights cases where no pecuniary loss shown), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 963 , 96 S.Ct. 1748 , 48 L.Ed.2d 208 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lavicky v. Burnett
See Corriz v. Naranjo, 667 F.2d 892, 897 (10th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1123 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982); Smith v. Heath, 691 F.2d 220, 226 (6th Cir.1982); cf. Hostrop v. Board of Junior College, District No. 515, 523 F.2d 569, 579 (7th Cir.1975) (citing cases awarding damages in civil rights cases where no pecuniary loss shown), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 963 , 96 S.Ct. 1748 , 48 L.Ed.2d 208 (1976). 28 Defendants Otis and Coppock claim that the trial court erred in not granting their motions for a directed verdict or for judgment n.o.v.
discussed
Cited "see"
Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company and Nu-Car Carriers, Inc.
Hill v. Trustees of Ind. Univ., 537 F.2d 248, 251 (7th Cir.1976); accord Martin v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc., 665 F.2d 598 , 602 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert, dismissed, 458 U.S. 1122 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Elizabeth A. Brandon and James D. Muse, Cross-Appellants v. Robert J. Allen, Defendant-Cross-Appellee, E. Winslow Chapman, Cross-Appellee
See Corriz v. Naranjo, 667 F.2d 892, 897-98 (10th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982); Herrera v. Valentine, 653 F.2d 1220, 1227-31 (8th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
30 Fair empl.prac.cas. 11, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,084 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Brown & Root, Inc., Cross-Appellant
Accord, Fernandes v. Limmer, 663 F.2d 619, 636 (5th Cir. 1981), petition for cert. dismissed, - U.S. -, 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1395 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
The General Contracting & Trading Co., LLC v. Interpole, Inc. v. Transamerican Steamship Corporation, Third-Party
Accord Commodities Export Co. v. U.S. Customs Service, 888 F.2d 431, 436-37 (6th Cir.1989) (standard for whether some type of hearing is required on Rule 12(b)(1) motion is whether or not genuine issues of material fact exist); see also Martin v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc., 665 F.2d 598 , 602 n. 1 (5th Cir.) (discussing when action may be dismissed without a hearing), cert. dism’d, 458 U.S. 1122 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melton v. City Of Oklahoma City
See also Corriz v. Naranjo, 667 F.2d 892, 901 (10th Cir.) (Doyle, J., specially concurring) (instructions not properly objected to at trial to be reviewed where error may well have been a generating factor which culminated in unwarranted verdict or where a "miscarriage of justice may occur"), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1123 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982); 1 S. Childress & M.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Melton v. City of Oklahoma City
See also Corriz v. Naranjo, 667 F.2d 892, 901 (10th Cir.) (Doyle, J., specially concurring) (instructions not properly objected to at trial to be reviewed where error may well have been a generating factor which culminated in unwarranted verdict or where a “miscarriage of justice may occur”), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1123 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1394 (1982); 1 S. Childress & M.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Altonette Jackson v. Raoul Galan, in His Official Capacity as Clerk, 24th Judicial District Court for the Parish of Jefferson
(2×)
Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 , 104 S.Ct. 1970, 1981-82 , 80 L.Ed.2d 565 (1984); see also Fernandes v. Limmer, 663 F.2d 619, 637 (5th Cir. Unit A 1981), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1124 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1395 (1982) (section 1988 fees are an element of costs rather than damages, and may be awarded in spite of officials’ immunity). 6 .
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Plain Dealer Publishing Co., Cross-Appellee v. City of Lakewood, Cross-Appellant
(4×)
Under the Secretary's interpretation, charities whose First Amendment rights are abridged by the fundraising limitation simply would have traded a direct prohibition on their activity for a licensing scheme that, if it is available to them at all, is available only at the unguided discretion of the Secretary of State. 14 Id. at 964 n. 12, 104 S.Ct. at 2851 n. 12 (citations omitted); See also Fernandes v. Limmer, 663 F.2d 619, 631 (5th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1124 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1395 (1982) (holding unconstitutional ordinance that gave executive director excessive discr…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now v. Municipality of Golden, Colorado
(4×)
See, e.g., Strasser v. Doorley, 432 F.2d 567, 568 (1st Cir.1970); Natco Theatres, Inc. v. Rainer, 463 F.Supp. 1124, 1126 (S.D.N.Y.1979); see also Fernandes v. Limmer, 663 F.2d 619, 625 (5th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1124 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1395 (1982). 3 Here the trial judge reasoned that “the narrow question presented by the attack on the facial validity of this ordinance is whether the requirement of an application for an exemption is unreasonable.” Trial Court op. at 5-6.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Association Of Community Organizations For Reform Now v. Municipality Of Golden
(4×)
See, e.g., Strasser v. Doorley, 432 F.2d 567, 568 (1st Cir.1970); Natco Theatres, Inc. v. Ratner, 463 F.Supp. 1124, 1126 (S.D.N.Y.1979); see also Fernandes v. Limmer, 663 F.2d 619, 625 (5th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed, 458 U.S. 1124 , 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1395 (1982). 3 16 Here the trial judge reasoned that "the narrow question presented by the attack on the facial validity of this ordinance is whether the requirement of an application for an exemption is unreasonable." Trial Court op. at 5-6.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Curtis Graves v. Ben Barnes
See also Fernandez v. Limmer, 663 F.2d 619 , 637 (5th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed,-U.S.-, 103 S.Ct. 5 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1395 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McDonald
v.
Alexander, Governor of Tennessee
v.
Alexander, Governor of Tennessee
No. A-958.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Sep 9, 1982.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Application for injunction, addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court, denied.