green
Positive treatment
7.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shields v. Keating
(2×)
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); Kirkpatrick v. J.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bank of Denver v. Southeastern Capital Group, Inc.
(2×)
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 469-70 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); Dalton v. Alston & Bird, 741 F.Supp. 1322, 1327-28 (S.D.Ill.), modified, 116 F.R.D. 342 (S.D.Ill.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re MDC Holdings Securities Litigation
(2×)
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Eckstein v. Balcor Film Investors
(2×)
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 468 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Stinson v. Van Valley Development Corp.
(2×)
See Abell v. Potomac Insurance Co., 858 F.2d 1104 (5th Cir.1988) (narrow reading of seminal case Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrew L. Smith v. Jack R. Ayres
(2×)
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 468 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); Finkel v. Docutel/Olivetti Corp., 817 F.2d 356, 359-60 (5th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 1220 , 99 L.Ed.2d 421 (1988); see also Rifkin v. Crow, 574 F.2d 256, 262 (5th Cir.1978) ("where a plaintiff alleges deception by defendant’s nondisclosure of material information, the Ute presumption obviates the need for plaintiff to prove actual reliance on the omitted information.”). 8 .This distinction has occasioned some confusion in the courts.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shores v. Sklar
(2×)
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983) (Shores I ). 1 I. 2 The events giving rise to this litigation occurred almost sixteen years ago.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shores v. Sklar
(2×)
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983) (Shores I). 1 I.
discussed
Cited "see"
James v. Nico Energy Corp.
(2×)
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 468 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); see also Hazen, The Law of Securities Regulation §§ 13.4-13.6 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
James v. Nico Energy Corp.
(2×)
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 468 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); see also Hazen, The Law of Securities Regulation Secs. 13.4-13.6 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kinser v. Commonwealth
(2×)
See United States v. Knight, 680 F.2d 470 (6th Cir.1982) cert. den. 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 723 , 74 L.Ed.2d 950 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Platsis v. EF Hutton & Co. Inc.
(2×)
See, Rose v. Arkansas Valley Environmental & Utility Authority, 562 F.Supp. 1180 , (CCH) Fed.Sec.L.Rep. ¶99, 224 (W.D.Mo.1983) at pp. 95, 940-41, and cases cited therein, i.e., Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462 (5th Cir.1981), (en banc), cert. *1301 denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); Dekro v. Stern Bros. & Co., 540 F.Supp 406 (W.D.Mo.1982); Frankel v. Wyllie & Thornhill Inc, 537 F.Supp. 730 (WD.Va.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Slotnick v. United States
See Armstrong v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 966 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 723 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); Minimo v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 896 (1982); Baker v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 668 (1980); Cunningham, 549 F.2d at 753 . 5 The legislative history of § 211 is rather scant.
discussed
Cited "see"
Little River Lumber Co. v. United States
See Armstrong v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 966, 970 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 723 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); Jones v. United States, 229 Ct.Cl. 700, 702 (1981); Goewey v. United States, supra, 222 Ct.Cl. at 108, 612 F.2d at 541.
discussed
Cited "see"
Freschi v. Grand Coal Venture
(2×)
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 468 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); Rochez Bros., Inc. v. Rhoades, 491 F.2d 402, 410 (3d Cir.1974), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 993 , 96 S.Ct. 2205 , 48 L.Ed.2d 817 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education
(2×)
See 703 F. 2d 564 (1982). 3 Because of the importance of the issue, and because of differences among the Courts of Appeals, see n. 6, infra, we granted cer-tiorari. 459 U. S. 1102 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Kennedy v. Tallant
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,428
See Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Enron Corp. Securities
(2×)
See, e.g., Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 468 (5th Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); Finkel v. Docutel/Olivetti Corp., 817 F.2d 356 , 359 & n. 6 (5th Cir.1987) (observing that although Affiliated Ute did not discuss the question, "[c]ourts applying Affiliated Ute have doctrinally invoked a rebuttable presumption of reliance based on proof of materiality alleging deception by non-disclosure of information.”), cert denied, 485 U.S. 959 , 108 S.Ct. 1220 , 99 L.Ed.2d 421 (1988). 50 . 524 F.2d 891 , 905-08 (9th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 816 ,…
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Rosenthal v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
(4×)
See also Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 468 (5th Cir.1981) (stating that Affiliated Ute established a presumption that made it possible for plaintiffs to meet their burden of showing reliance), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Bexar County Health Facility Development Corp. Securities Litigation
(2×)
See, e.g., Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462 (5th Cir.1981) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983); Arthur Young & Co. v. United States District Court, 549 F.2d 686 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 829 , 98 S.Ct. 109 , 54 L.Ed.2d 88 (1977); T.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Buford White Lumber Co. Profit Sharing & Savings Plan & Trust v. Octagon Properties, Ltd.
(2×)
See, e.g., Shores v. Sklar, 647 F.2d 462, 468 (5th Cir.1981) (“When the Ute presumption attaches the defendant may rebut it by showing that the plaintiff did not rely on the defendant’s duty to disclose”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1102 , 103 S.Ct. 722 , 74 L.Ed.2d 949 (1983), cited in Zobrist v. Coal-X, Inc., 708 F.2d 1511, 1519 (10th Cir.1983).
Migra
v.
Warren City School District Board of Education
v.
Warren City School District Board of Education
No. 82-738.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 10, 1983.
Cited by 20 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari granted.