Asam v. Stanley, 459 U.S. 1189 (1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Asam v. Stanley, 459 U.S. 1189 (1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
495 citation events across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Doyle J. Williams v. Bill Armontrout (ca8, 1990-02-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Doyle J. Williams v. Bill Armontrout (2×)
8th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Trimble, 638 S.W.2d 726, 732 (Mo.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1188 , 103 S.Ct. 838 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983).
examined Cited "see" State v. Cummings (5×)
N.C. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pinch, 306 N.C. at 25 , 292 S.E.2d at 222 , cert. denied, Smith v. North Carolina, 459 U.S. 1056 [ 103 S.Ct. 474 ], 74 L.Ed.2d 622 , reh'g denied, Pinch v. North Carolina, 459 U.S. 1189 , [ 103 S.Ct. 839 ] 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 ; State v. Oliver, 309 N.C. at 360, 307 S.E.2d at 326 .
examined Cited "see" State v. McLaughlin (5×)
N.C. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pinch, 306 N.C. 1 , 292 S.E.2d 203 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1056 , 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982), reh'g denied, 459 U.S. 1189 , 103 S.Ct. 839 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983); State v. Williams, 305 N.C. 656 , 292 S.E.2d 243 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1056 , 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982), reh'g denied, 459 U.S. 1189 , 103 S.Ct. 839 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983).
cited Cited "see" Gilmore v. Armontrout
W.D. Mo. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Trimble, 638 S.W.2d 726, 738 (Mo.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1188 , 103 S.Ct. 838 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Zuniga (2×)
N.C. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Williams, 305 N.C. 656 , 292 S.E. 2d 243 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1056 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 622 (1982), reh’g denied, 459 U.S. 1189 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 1031 (1983).
examined Cited "see" State v. Brown (6×)
N.C. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pinch, 306 N.C. at 17-18, 292 S.E. 2d at 218 , cert. denied, Smith v. North Carolina, 459 U.S. 1056 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 622 , reh’g denied, Pinch v. North Carolina, 459 U.S. 1189 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 1031 .
discussed Cited "see" In the Interest of C.L.P. v. Pate
Mo. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Moore, 306 N.C. 394 , 293 S.E.2d 127 (1982), appeal dismissed, 459 U.S. 1189 , 103 S.Ct. 776 , 74 L.Ed.2d 987 (1982); In re Keyes, 574 P.2d 1026 (Okla.1977), appeal dismissed, 439 U.S. 804 , 99 S.Ct. 59 , 58 L.Ed.2d 97 (1978); Knox v. Lynchburg Div. of Social Services, 223 Va. 213 , 288 S.E.2d 399 (1982).
examined Cited "see" State v. Marlow (3×)
N.C. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Williams, 305 N.C. 656 , 292 S.E.2d 243 , reh. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 839 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1982).
examined Cited "see" State v. Moose (3×)
N.C. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pinch, 306 N.C. 1 , 292 S.E.2d 203 , cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982), reh. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 103 S.Ct. 839 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983).
examined Cited "see" Hutchins v. Woodard (3×)
4th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pinch, 306 N.C. 1, 9-10 , 292 S.E.2d 203, 213 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1056 , 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982), reh’g denied, 459 U.S. 1189 , 103 S.Ct. 839 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983): It would have amounted to an absurdity and a mockery of our law to have permitted these jurors to sit on a case where imposition of the death penalty was an available sentencing option.
discussed Cited "see" Hutchins v. Woodard (2×)
4th Cir. · 1984 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pinch, 306 N.C. 1, 9-10 , 292 S.E.2d 203, 213 , cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982), reh'g denied, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 839 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983): It would have amounted to an absurdity and a mockery of our law to have permitted these jurors to sit on a case where imposition of the death penalty was an available sentencing option.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Stokes (2×)
unknown court · 1983 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Hutchins, 303 N.C. 321 , 279 S.E. 2d 788 (1981). *653 The trial judge’s determination of whether a mitigating circumstance should be submitted to the sentencing jury should be guided by our statement in State v. Pinch, 306 N.C. 1 , 292 S.E. 2d 203 , cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 622 (1982), reh. denied, --- U.S. ---, 103 S.Ct. 839 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 1031 (1983).
examined Cited "see, e.g." State v. McLaughlin (3×)
N.C. · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
"Such evidence has no bearing upon defendant's character, record or the nature of his participation in the offense." Id.; see also State v. Williams, 305 N.C. 656 , 292 S.E.2d 243 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1056 , 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982), reh'g denied, 459 U.S. 1189 , 103 S.Ct. 839 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983).
examined Cited "see, e.g." State v. Morston (3×)
N.C. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
In Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), the Supreme Court of the United States explained that "it is impermissible to penalize an individual for exercising his Fifth Amendment privilege when he is under police custodial interrogation." Id. at 468 n. 37, 86 S.Ct. at 1625 n. 37, 16 L.Ed.2d at 720 n. 37; see also State v. Williams, 305 N.C. 656, 673-74 , 292 S.E.2d 243, 254 , cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1056 , 103 S.Ct. 474 , 74 L.Ed.2d 622 (1982), reh'g denied 459 U.S. 1189 , 103 S.Ct. 839 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983) (explaining that arguments of this sort are based …
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Schlup v. State
Mo. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Trimble, 638 S.W.2d 726, 732 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1188 , 103 S.Ct. 838 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 1031 (1983) (sole aggravating circumstance that defendant was in a place of lawful confinement).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Morton
N.M. Ct. App. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See State v. Stout; State v. Rhodes; see also State v. Trimble, 638 S.W.2d 726 (Mo. 1982) (En Banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1188 , 103 S.Ct. 838 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983) (statutorily required notice of aggravation given defendant before trial satisfies due process).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Caldwell
Mo. Ct. App. · 1985 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Trimble, 638 S.W.2d 726, 732 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1188 , 103 S.Ct. 838 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1031 (1983).
examined Cited "see, e.g." State v. Maynard (4×)
N.C. · 1984 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State v. Pinch, 306 N.C. 1 , 292 S.E. 2d 203 , cert. denied, 74 L.Ed. 2d 622 (1982), reh. denied, 74 L.Ed. 2d 1031 (1983); State v. Taylor, 304 N.C. 249 , 283 S.E. 2d 761 (1981), cert. denied, 77 L.Ed. 2d 1398, reh. denied, 77 L.Ed. 2d 1456 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Asam
v.
Stanley, dba Poodle Palace Lampkin-Asam v. Miami Daily News, Inc., dba The Miami News Mizrahi v. United States Armstrong v. Washington Williams v. North Carolina Pinch v. North Carolina Cotton v. Federal Land Bank of Columbia White v. Florida Sellner v. Prince George's County, Maryland
No. 82-43; No. 82-193; No. 82-445; No. 82-5271; No. 82-5352; No. 82-5353; No. 82-5476; No. 82-5534; No. 82-5581.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 24, 1983.
459 U.S. 1189
Cited by 175 opinions  |  Published

ante, p. 859;

ante, p. 806;

ante, p. 1086;

ante, p. 1089;

ante, p. 1056;

ante, p. 1056;

ante, p. 1041;

ante, p. 1055; and

ante, p. 1090. Petitions for rehearing denied.