green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
6.7 score
“retroactive rule of administrative agency is invalid, generally speaking, only if unreasonable”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Texaco, Inc. v. Department of Energy
retroactive rule of administrative agency is invalid, generally speaking, only if unreasonable
cited
Cited "see"
Garthwait v. Eversource Energy Service Company
See In re Cement Antitrust Litig., 673 F.2d 1020 , 1026 (9th Cir. 1981), aff’d, 459 U.S. 1190 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hirsch-Chemie Limited Hirschscionics Limited Hirsch Cinemedic Corporation v. The Johns Hopkins University
See In re Cement Antitrust Litig., 673 F.2d 6 1020, 1026 (9th Cir. 1982), aff'd, 459 U.S. 1190 (1983). 7 Since the district court's order that is the subject of this appeal is not final and does not appear to fall within any exception to the rules requiring finality, this appeal is hereby dismissed. 2 DISMISSED 1 On October 2, 1991, seven days after the district court's order and prior to the running of the thirty day period in which the court directed the defen dant to notify the court whether it intended to pursue its counterclaim, the notation "Case closed" was entered.
discussed
Cited "see"
Barbara A. Murphy v. Joseph Hamilton Fay Lassiter Carr Mills Marilyn Gasswint, Katrina O. McKay Priscilla Penne Waugh v. Joseph Hamilton Fay Lassiter, Donna Patrice Queen v. Joseph Hamilton Fay Lassiter Danny Thompson
See In re Cement Antitrust Litig., 673 F.2d 1020, 1026 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd, 459 U.S. 1190 (1983). 4 The courts of appeal "have jurisdiction of appeals from all final decisions of the district courts," see 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and from a narrow class of "collateral orders" that would otherwise effectively destroy a party's rights and be practically unreviewable upon appeal from a final judgment.
discussed
Cited "see"
McIntyre v. State
(2×)
See State v. Rebstock, 418 So.2d 1306 (La.1982), cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1190 , 103 S.Ct. 841 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ballard v. Uribe
(2×)
However “[i]t is well settled that a presumption of prejudice arises from any juror misconduct.” (People v. Honeycutt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 150, 156 ; accord Hasson v. Ford Motor Co., supra, 32 Cal.3d 388, 416 , cert. dism. (1983) 459 U.S. 1190 .) The presumption may be rebutted by affirmative evidence or by “a reviewing court’s examination of the entire record to determine whether there is a reasonable probability of actual harm to the complaining party resulting from the misconduct.” {Id.., at p. 417.) In conducting this examination, the reviewing court may consider “the strength of …
cited
Cited "see"
Joseph v. Bohn Ford, Inc.
See Hasson v. Ford Motor Company, 32 Cal.3d 388 , 185 Cal. Rptr. 654 , 650 P.2d 1171 (1982), cert. dismissed 459 U.S. 1190 , 103 S.Ct. 1167 , 75 L.Ed.2d 422 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Teleport Oil Company
See In re Cement Antitrust Litigation (MDL 296), 688 F.2d 1297, 1301-03 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd for absence of quorom sub nom., Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement Co., 459 U.S. 1190 , 103 S.Ct. 1172 , 75 L.Ed.2d 425 (1983). 9 APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 Although the prior decisions of this court discussed below addressed 28 U.S.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
Teleport Oil Co. v. Security Pacific National Bank
See In re Cement Antitrust Litigation (MDL 296), 688 F.2d 1297, 1301-03 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd for absence of quorom sub nom., Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement Co., 459 U.S. 1190 , 103 S.Ct. 1172 , 75 L.Ed.2d 425 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Petricevic v. Shin
See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 ; see also In re Cement Antitrust Litig., 673 F.2d 1020, 1025-26 (9th Cir. 1982), aff’d sub nom., Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement Co., 459 U.S. 1190 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Elnora G. POPE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
(2×)
Co. v. Commissioner, 297 U.S. 129, 135 , 56 S.Ct. 397, 400 , 80 L.Ed. 528 (1936); see also Pennzoil Co. v. United States Dep’t of Energy, 680 F.2d 156 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1982), cert. dismissed, 459 U.S. 1190 , 103 S.Ct. 841 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1032 (1983); Kenneth Culp Davis, Administrative Law Treatise § 7:23 (2d ed. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnnie Reynaga v. Sharon M. Cammisa Steve White M. Cedillo Michael T. Garcia
(2×)
Co. v. United States District Court, 881 F.2d 1486, 1488-91 (9th Cir.1989); see also In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation, 688 F.2d 1297, 1301 (9th Cir.1982) (noting guidelines for granting mandamus), aff'd for lack of quorum, 459 U.S. 1190 , 103 S.Ct. 1173 , 75 L.Ed.2d 425 459 U.S. 1191 , 103 S.Ct. 1173 , 75 L.Ed.2d 425 (1983), issuance of such a writ is appropriate where, as here, a lower court has exceeded its jurisdiction.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rebstock
v.
Louisiana
v.
Louisiana
No. 82-968.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 31, 1983.
Published
Citer courts: Temporary Emergency Court of A… (1)
Sup. Ct. La. Certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 53.