green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
12.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1996 ·
…handcuffing substantially aggravates the intrusiveness of an otherwise routine investigatory detention and is not part of a typical terry stop
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Charles Ellis Black, Aka: Charles Black and Donald Lee Young, Aka: Robert Wilson
But cf. United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289-90 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983). 20 B.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. LaFleur
miranda warnings are necessary even during a terry stop if the suspect has been taken into custody or if the questioning otherwise takes place in a police dominated or compelling atmosphere
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Womack v. United States
(4×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
handcuffing substantially aggravates the intrusiveness of an otherwise routine investigatory detention and is not part of a typical terry stop
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
John Wesley Duffel v. Michael Dutton, Warden, Tennessee State Penitentiary
double jeopardy does not bar retrial when evidence is improperly excluded, ... not the result of the state's negligently failing to muster its proof.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chavez-Rivas v. Olsen
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 158 (3d Cir.1982) (citing Braden for principle that a § 2241 habeas petition “must be sought from a District Court with jurisdiction over the custodian of the prisoner”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Gordon
See United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1291-1292 (9th Cir. 1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983), cited with approval in Commonwealth v. Williams , 422 Mass, at 118; Commonwealth v. Pandolfino, 33 Mass. App. Ct. 96, 98 (1992); and Commonwealth v. Andrews, 34 Mass. App. Ct. 324, 329 (1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Gentry
See United States v. Weems, 49 F.3d 528, 530-31 (9th Cir.1995) (retrial not barred by double jeopardy where prosecutor failed to prove element of crime that, at time of trial, did not need to be proved) (citing Linam v. Griffin, 685 F.2d 369, 373-74 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1207 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernest James Perkins
See United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1291 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983); see also United States v. Smith, 3 F.3d 1088 (7th Cir.1993), cert. denied, 114 S.Ct. 733 (1994); United States v. Perdue, 8 F.3d 1455 (10th Cir.1993). 6 Therefore, we affirm the district court's denial of the motion to suppress with respect to statements made in response to the first and second police questions.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Friedland
(2×)
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 154-55 (3d Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 (1983); United States v. Dansker, 581 F.2d 69, 72 (3d Cir. 1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Friedland, David J. Friedland, in No. 95-5582. David Friedland v. Douglas Lansing, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Ft. Dix, Nj United States Parole Commission David J. Friedland, in No. 95-5583. David Friedland v. United States of America, David J. Friedland, In
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 154-55 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); United States v. Dansker, 581 F.2d 69, 72 (3d Cir.1978). 28 Friedland's use of old Rule 35(b) was a particularly blatant violation of the time constraint policy of the rule because in the motion he relied on his efforts to implement his "program" as a basis for a reduction of sentence.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lewis Theodore Wacker, United States of America v. Leroy Allen Cooley, United States of America v. John Lee Wacker, United States of America v. Edith Faye Wacker, United States of America v. Susan Mary Boyle, United States of America v. Michael L. Lipp, United States of America v. Perl Glen Van Pelt
See United States v. Weems, 49 F.3d 528, 530-31 (9th Cir.1995) (retrial not barred by double jeopardy where prosecutor failed to prove element of crime that, at time of trial, did not need to be proved) (citing Linam v. Griffin, 685 F.2d 369, 373-74 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1207 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983)). 43 We find the present situation analogous to that in Lockhart v. Nelson, 488 U.S. 33 , 109 S.Ct. 285 , 102 L.Ed.2d 265 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wacker
See United States v. Weems, 49 F.3d 528, 530-31 (9th Cir.1995) (retrial not barred by double jeopardy where prosecutor failed to prove element of crime that, at time of trial, did not need to be proved) (citing Linam v. Griffin, 685 F.2d 369, 373-74 (10th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1207 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Victor Manuel Mendoza, Aka: Javier Reyes Mendoza
See United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1982); United States v. Harrington, 923 F.2d 1371, 1373 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 854 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Luis Ayala
See United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir. 1982) (reasonable suspicion established when defendants were only people in sight who matched description of robbers), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jairo Lozano
Perez, 37 F.3d at 513 ; see United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1290 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983). 5 Trooper Rosell Owens testified at the suppression hearing that after he stopped Lozano for speeding, he noticed a strong smell of fresh paint as he approached the truck.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clarke Dexter Weems
(2×)
See Linam v. Griffin, 685 F.2d 369, 373-74 (10th Cir.1982) (rehearing on habitual offender status not barred merely because government’s original proof did not conform to the requirements of a change in law occurring after trial), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1207 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hanks
See United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289-90 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211, 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983); United States v. Harley, 682 F.2d 398, 402 (2d Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Christopher X. Bohlen v. Paul D. Caspari William Webster
See Linam v. Griffin, 685 F.2d 369, 374 (10th Cir.1982) (double jeopardy does not bar resentencing when evidence is incorrectly excluded), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1207 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983); Denton v. Duckworth, 873 F.2d 144, 148 (7th Cir.) (under Lockhart v. Nelson, double jeopardy does not apply where evidence initially introduced was sufficient, even if some of, it was introduced erroneously), cert. denied, 493 U.S 941, 110 S.Ct. 341 , 107 L.Ed.2d 330 (1989).
cited
Cited "see"
Joanne Kotler, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc. v. The American Tobacco Company
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 157 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ramirez
See generally State v. Grisby, 97 Wn.2d 493, 499 , 647 P.2d 6 (1982) (jury is presumed to follow the court's instructions), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Black
See United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward X. Mondello
(2×)
The Court stressed that “our cases impose no rigid time limitation on Terry stops” and that the inquiry must focus on other factors as well, such as “the need to consider the law enforcement purposes to be served by the stop as well as the time reasonably needed to effectuate those purposes.” Id. at 685 , 105 S.Ct. at 1575 (citations omitted); see generally United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1290-91 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983); United States v. Winfrey, 915 F.2d 212, 216 (6th Cir.1990); United States v. Hardy, 855 F.2d 753…
discussed
Cited "see"
Lu Ann Buffkins v. City of Omaha, Douglas County, Nebraska, a Municipal Corporation Alvin Grigsby And, John Friend
See United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1982) (police may detain a person for further investigation when, together with other relevant facts, the person’s race matches the racial description of persons suspected of criminal activity), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983). 8 II.
cited
Cited "see"
Wilson v. State
See generally United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983); State v. Ruiz, 526 So.2d 170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).
cited
Cited "see"
Harbin v. City of Alexandria
See United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 775 , 776 (1983); United States v. Beck, 602 F.2d 726, 729 (5th Cir.1979). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez-Zayas
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 152 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Martinez-Zayas
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 152 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983). 17 The government's reliance on Sec. 3742 is misplaced.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mack Arthur Young
See United States v. Bruscino, 687 F.2d 938 (7th Cir.1982) (en banc), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonard G. Greene
See United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289-90 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William P. Jack
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 158 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1982); Block v. Petter, 631 F.2d 233 , 235 n. 1 (3d Cir.1980); see also Zannino v. Arnold, 531 F.2d 687 , 689 n. 5 (3d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Morales
Thus, questioning after a frisk, without more, does not constitute custodial interrogation (Berkemer v McCarty, supra; see, United States v Bautista, 684 F2d 1286, 1291-1292, cert denied 459 US 1211 ; United States v Pratt, 645 F2d 89, 90-91, cert denied 454 US 881 ; State v Roadenbaugh, 234 Kan 474, 673 P2d 1166, 1169-1172 ; People v Greer, 110 Cal App 3d 235, 240, 167 Cal Rptr 762, 765).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Borges
(2×)
See United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Anderson
See State v. Grisby, 97 Wn.2d 493, 506-07 , 647 P.2d 6 (1982), *107 cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Rehkopf
See United States v Ferri, 686 F2d 147, 152-154 (CA 3, 1982), cert den 459 US 1211 (1983); 15 Wright, Miller, Cooper & Elliott, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 3919; 16 Wright, Miller, Cooper & Gressman, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 3936, p 263 & n 25.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roscoe Emory Dean, Jr., in Re United States of America
(2×)
Id.; accord, United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 151 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983); United States v. DeMier, 671 F.2d 1200 , 1204 n. 12 (8th Cir.1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Samsel
See State v. Grisby, 97 Wn.2d 493, 506-07 , 647 P.2d 6 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983); State v. Cross, supra; State v. Vannoy, 25 Wn.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Scher Presents, Inc.
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 152-54 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub nom., Matthews v. United States, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Scher Presents, Inc.
See United States v. Ferri, 686 F.2d 147, 152-54 (3d Cir.1982), cert. denied sub nom., Matthews v. United States, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1205 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983). 3 As purely legal entities, corporations present a special case.
discussed
Cited "see"
Duffel v. Dutton
In footnote 4, Burks says: “There is no claim in this case that the trial court committed error by excluding prosecution evidence which, if received, would have rebutted any claim of evidentiary insufficiency.” In the case before us, the trial judge improperly excluded the crucial evidence, and this case may be distinguished from Burks * * *. 631 S.W.2d 445, 448 (Tenn.Cr.App.1981); accord Linam v. Griffin, 685 F.2d 369, 374 [2] (10th Cir.1982), cert. den. 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1207 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Dictado
See State v. Grisby, 97 Wn.2d 493, 497-98 , 647 P.2d 6 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 75 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re David S.
See, e.g., United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289-90 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983) (finding that, under the circumstances, placing suspect in handcuffs was justified when police believed another suspect was close by and at large).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Phillips v. State
State v. Barber, 118 Wash.2d 335 , 823 P.2d 1068 (1992) (en banc); see also United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289 (9th Cir.1982) ("Race or color alone is not a sufficient basis for making an investigatory stop."), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983) (citing United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873, 886-87 , 95 S.Ct. 2574 , 45 L.Ed.2d 607 (1975)); La-Fontaine v. State, 749 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (holding that there was no reasonable suspicion to justify an investigatory stop where a white female was talking to black males in a predominately b…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Jones
App 813, 819, 901 P.2d 1050 , review denied, 128 Wn.2d 1004 , 907 P.2d 296 (1995). 4 State v. Hoffman, 116 Wn.2d 51, 74 , 804 P.2d 577 (1991); State v. Bythrow, 114 Wn.2d 713, 718 , 790 P.2d 154 (1990); CrR 4.4(c)(2) (discretionary severance is appropriate when “necessary to achieve a fair determination of the guilt or innocence of a defendant”); see also State v. Grisby, 97 Wn.2d 493, 506-08 , 647 P.2d 6 (1982), cert. denied., 459 U.S. 1211 (1983). 5 Grisby, 97 Wn.2d at 507 . 6 State v. Canedo-Astorga, 79 Wn.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Williams
See also United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289-1290 (9th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983); United States v. Laing, 889 F.2d 281, 285-286 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Dana Estabrook
See Nix, 467 U.S. at 444 ; see also United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1290-91 (9th Cir.1982) (length of a routine investigative stop depends on the time required for police to conduct an adequate investigation), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas L. Hudspeth
(2×)
This is not a "case of the state getting a second chance to prove something it had failed to prove the first time, the heart of double jeopardy's bar." Tate v. Armontrout, 914 F.2d 1022, 1026-27 (8th Cir.1990) (concluding that an insufficient record was trial error); see also Linam v. Griffin, 685 F.2d 369, 374 (10th Cir.1982) (holding that double jeopardy does not bar retrial when evidence is incorrectly excluded), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1207 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983). 68 In reaching the conclusion that the Double Jeopardy Clause is not violated by the reconsideration of the th…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Pendergast v. State
See, e.g., Martin v. United States, 691 F.2d 1235, 1240 (8th Cir.1982) (holding that evidence was sufficient- to withstand a motion for acquittal, where the threatening'language was not ambiguous), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1207 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Loren Francis Bellrichard
Watts, 394 U.S. at 708 , 89 S.Ct. at 1402 ; see also Martin v. United States, 691 F.2d 1235, 1240 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1207 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Andrews
See also United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286, 1289-1290 (9th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 (1983) (handcuffing permitted for investigative stop where two armed robbery suspects appeared nervous and one suspect was pacing up and down); United States v. Laing, 889 F.2d 281, 285-286 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Turner
See also, United States v. Bautista, 684 F.2d 1286 (9th Cir.1982) (holding that robbery suspects found on likely escape route, meeting description of robbers and dressed inappropriately for the weather may be stopped) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1211 , 103 S.Ct. 1206 , 75 L.Ed.2d 446 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kell
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 82-5575.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 1983.
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.