green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.0 score
G Cite
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Lake v. First Nationwide Bank
But see Welch v. Board of Directors of Wildwood Golf Club, 146 F.R.D. 131, 136 (W.D.Pa.1993) ("The burden is on the defendants to prove that the representation will be inadequate.”) (citing Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779, 788 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982)). .
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jarvis v. a & M RECORDS
the test is whether the accused work is so similar to the plaintiffs work that an ordinary reasonable person would conclude that the defendant unlawfully appropriated the plaintiffs protec- 291 tibie expression by taking material of substance and value
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Zepik v. Tidewater Midwest, Inc.
the rico claim, the only federal claim to which seidman's common law counts could be pendent, was not dismissed before trial, so the rule just stated is not strictly applicable.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
MOZES ON BEHALF OF GENERAL ELEC. CO. v. Welch
... mere conclusory allegations of director wrongdoing will not suffice to excuse demand.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kaster v. Modification Systems, Inc.
certainly, there is no presumption that a director is controlled. rather, the issue is an intensely factual one.
cited
Cited "see"
Daventree Ltd. v. Republic of Azerbaijan
See Johns v. Rozet, 141 F.R.D. 211, 217 (D.D.C.1992) (citing Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779, 788 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fields v. Biomatrix, Inc.
Wetzel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 508 F.2d 239, 247 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 1011 , 95 S.Ct. 2415 (1975); see Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779, 788 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thomas & Betts Corp. v. Panduit Corp.
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 453 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); Real Colors, Inc. v. Patel, 974 F.Supp. 645, 651 (N.D.Ill.1997).
cited
Cited "see"
Brandt v. Steel Hector & Davis
See generally Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 456 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Walco Investments, Inc. v. Thenen
See Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779, 789 (3rd Cir.1982) (class representatives are not required to have a detailed knowledge of the litigation), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Company
See In re Wedtech Corp. (Wedtech Corp. v. KMG Main Hurdman), 81 B.R. 240, 241 (S.D.N.Y.1987) ("[A]s alleged against an accountant, claims of fraud, malpractice, aiding and abetting a fraud ..., fraudulent transfer, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and monies had and received, allege what is essentially 'a single form of wrongdoing under different names.' ") (quoting Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 453 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982)). 37 "Under the Bankruptcy Code, the bankruptcy trustee may bring claims founded, inter a…
discussed
Cited "see"
Hirsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co.
See In re Wedtech Corp. (Wedtech Corp. v. KMG Main Hurdman), 81 B.R. 240, 241 (S.D.N.Y.1987) (“[A]s alleged against an accountant, claims of fraud, malpractice, aiding and abetting a fraud ..., fraudulent transfer, breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and monies had and received, allege what is essentially ‘a single form of wrongdoing under different names.’ ”) (quoting Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 453 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re MacMillan Inc.
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); accord FDIC v. Shrader & York, 991 F.2d 216, 224 (5th Cir.1993); In re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation, 802 F.Supp. 804 , 817 (E.D.N.Y.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
Maxwell Macmillan Realization Liquidating Trust v. Aboff (In re Macmillan Inc.)
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); accord FDIC v. Shrader & York, 991 F.2d 216, 224 (5th Cir.1993); In re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation, 802 F.Supp. 804 , 817 (E.D.N.Y.1992).
discussed
Cited "see"
CMM Cable Rep., Inc. v. Keymarket Communications, Inc.
Accord, Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp., 672 F.2d 607, 619 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp. v. Atari, Inc., 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Neely ex rel. Neely v. Rutherford County Schools
See Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp., 672 F.2d 607, 620 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. Church & Dwight Co., 560 F.2d 1325, 1333-34 (7th Cir.1977), ce rt. denied, 434 U.S. 1070 , 98 S.Ct. 1252 , 55 L.Ed.2d 772 (1978). 18.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re ML-Lee Acquisition Fund II, L.P. & ML-Lee Acquisition Fund (Retirement Accounts) II, L.P. Securities Litigation
See Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779, 789 (3d Cir.) (class representative adequate even where he “displayed a complete ignorance of the facts concerning the transaction that he was challenging), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982); In re Data Access, 103 F.R.D. 130, 141 (D.N.J.1984); Peil v. Speiser, 97 F.R.D. 657, 660 (E.D.Pa.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Mirror Group Newspapers, PLC v. Maxwell Newspapers, Inc. (In Re Maxwell Newspapers, Inc.)
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); accord FDIC v. Shrader & York, 991 F.2d 216, 224 (5th Cir.1993).
cited
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corp. v. KPMG Peat Marwick
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 454-55 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Pride Communications Ltd. Partnership v. WCKG, INC.
See Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp., 672 *904 F.2d 607, 620 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. Church & Dwight Co., 560 F.2d 1325, 1333-34 (7th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1070 , 98 S.Ct. 1252 , 55 L.Ed.2d 772 (1978). 18.
cited
Cited "see"
Drabkin v. L & L Construction Associates, Inc. (In Re Latin Investment Corp.)
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); Security Am.
discussed
Cited "see"
Oppenheimer-Palmieri Fund, L.P. v. Peat Marwick Main & Co.
See Cenco, Inc. v. Siedman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 , 453 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982). “[W]here a defendant’s only sin is its failure to prevent transgressions by the plaintiff, no benefit flows to the public from rewarding the transgressor.” Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 568 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Crazy Eddie Securities Litigation
See Cenco, Inc. v. Siedman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 , 453 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982). "[W]here a defendant's only sin is its failure to prevent transgressions by the plaintiff, no benefit flows to the public from rewarding the transgressor." Miller v. New York Produce Exchange, 550 F.2d 762, 568 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 823 , 98 S.Ct. 68 , 54 L.Ed.2d 80 (1977).
cited
Cited "see"
General Glass Industries Corporation v. Monsour Medical Foundation
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 , Fed.Sec.L.Rep. p. 98615 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 117 [177, 74 L.Ed.2d 145 ] (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
General Glass Industries Corp. v. Monsour Medical Foundation
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 , Fed.Sec.L.Rep. p. 98615 (7th Cir.1982), ce rt. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 117 [177, 74 L.Ed.2d 145 ] (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Autoskill, Inc. v. National Educational Support Systems Inc.
See Atari Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp., 672 F.2d 607, 614 (7th Cir.1982), cert. den. 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Comeau v. Rupp
See generally Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 454-56 (7th Cir.) (discussing relevant factors to the application of respondeat superior in auditor malpractice actions), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joy Manufacturing Corp. v. Pullman-Peabody Co.
See Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982), where the court stated that in “determining whether a demand is necessary, [the court] should consider whether a demand on the directors would be likely to prod them to correct a wrong.” Berger’s suit sought to have the stock rights and pension plans, the poison pills, declared invalid as the products of a breach of fiduciary duty by the Joy board of directors.
cited
Cited "see"
Granada Investments, Inc. v. DWG Corp.
See Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779, 788 (3rd Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982); see also Baron v. Strawbridge & Clothier, 646 F.Supp. 690 (E.D.Pa.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Floyd v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
See Dorsey v. Honda Motor Co., 655 F.2d 650, 657-58 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982), later proceeding 730 F.2d 675 (11th Cir.1984); Prosser § 2 at 9-10. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
(2×)
See Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779, 783 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982); Heyl & Patterson Int’l, Inc. v. F.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
Shelton v. Thompson
If, as alleged, this deflated value was the product of illegal or fraudulent conduct on the part of Lexington's directors, then Colonial would presumably deem it desirable and appropriate to seek redress for a loss occasioned by persons who, at the time of the loss, were outside the Colonial corporate structure. [2] If that presumption is correct, and I believe that it is, then for the plaintiffs to give notice to Colonial's directors before bringing a derivative action would not be futileit would be imperative, given that "the demand requirement of Rule 23.1 should be rigorously enforced." …
discussed
Cited "see"
King v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
See Dorsey v. Honda Motor Co. Ltd., 655 F.2d 650 (car manufacturer's knowing refusal to accept recommendations for eliminating risks, constituted wantonness, willfulness or reckless indifference to the rights of others), modified, 670 F.2d 21 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); Piper Aircraft Corp. v. Coulter, 426 So.2d 1108 (Fla. 4th DCA) (failure to act in face of known substantial danger to lives of aircraft passengers sufficient to justify punitive damages), review denied, 436 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1983); American Motors Corp. v. Ellis, 403 So.2d 4…
discussed
Cited "see"
King Fisher Marine Service, Inc. v. Hanson Development Co.
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); Transok Pipeline Co. v. Darks, 565 F.2d 1150 (10th Cir.1977) cert. denied, 435 U.S. 1006 , 98 S.Ct. 1876 , 56 L.Ed.2d 388 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Samuel M. Feinberg Testamentary Trust v. Carter
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Consumers Power Co. Derivative Litigation
See Lewis v. Curtis, 671 F.2d 779 (3d Cir.), cert denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982); Tabas v. Mullane, 608 F.Supp. 759, 767 (D.N.J. 1985); Reilly Mortgage Group, Inc. v. Mount Vernon Savings & Loan Ass’n, 568 F.Supp. 1067 (E.D.Va.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
SJ Advanced Technology & Manufacturing Corp. v. Junkunc
Nothing blocks an injured competitor from calling on civil RICO; see Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 457 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed. 145 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Bank South Leasing, Inc., a Georgia Corporation v. James R. Williams and Julius M. Garner, Bank South Leasing, Inc., a Georgia Corporation v. Florida National Bank of Orlando, a National Banking Association, Bank South Leasing, Inc., a Georgia Corporation v. James R. Williams, Julius M. Garner, Florida National Bank of Orlando, a National Banking Association, and Allen G. MacArthur
See Dorsey v. Honda Motor Company, 673 F.2d 911 , 912 (5th Cir. Unit B), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Bank South Leasing, Inc. v. Williams
See Dorsey v. Honda Motor Company, 673 F.2d 911, 912 (5th Cir. Unit B), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. Central National Bank of Mattoon
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 454 (7th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); Commercial National Bank of Peoria v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 131 Ill.App.3d 977, 982 , 87 Ill.Dec. 107, 111 , 476 N.E.2d 809, 813 (3d Dist.1985); Carter v. Mueller, 120 Ill.App.3d 314, 320 , 75 Ill.Dec. 776, 781 , 457 N.E.2d 1335, 1340 (1st Dist.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Universal City Studios, Inc. v. Nintendo Co. Ltd.
See Atari, Inc. v. North American, 672 F.2d 607 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
Exeter Towers Associates v. Bowditch
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 457 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Roper Corporation v. Litton Systems, Inc.
See generally Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp., 672 F.2d 607, 620 , 214 USPQ 33, 43-44 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Scoreboard Posters, Inc., 600 F.2d 1184, 1187-88 , 203 USPQ 321, 323-24 (5th Cir.1979) (substantial likelihood of success); Wainwright Securities, Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., 558 F.2d 91, 94 , 194 USPQ 401, 402 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1014 , 98 S.Ct. 730 , 54 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Scott Buethe v. Britt Airlines, Inc.
See Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 458 (7th Cir.) (district court has discretion, on remand of pendent state claims after dismissal of federal claims affirmed, to dismiss pendent claim involving “novel and difficult issues of state law”), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); Financial General Bankshares, Inc. v. Metzger, 680 F.2d 768, 769 (D.C.Cir.1982) (abuse of discretion for district court to exercise pendent jurisdiction over novel and unsettled questions of District of Columbia law after dismissal of federal claims); Nottelson v. A.O.
discussed
Cited "see"
Edwards v. Sharkey
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 (7th Cir.) (dismissal of main claim after trial began did not require dismissal of ancillary cross-claim), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982) 4 The only information in the record concerning the settlement is that contained in Reliance's supplemental brief on jurisdiction 5 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (11th Cir.1981) (en banc), theEleventh Circuit adopted as precedent the decisions of the Fifth Circuit rendered prior to October 1, 1981 6 The Texas policy is designated No. T-NSA-166T801-1-79.
discussed
Cited "see"
Edwards v. Sharkey
See Cenco, Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449 (7th Cir.) (dismissal of main claim after trial began did not require dismissal of ancillary cross-claim), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982). .
cited
Cited "see"
Belushi v. Woodward
See Atari, Inc. v. North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp., 672 F.2d 607, 620 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Togut v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (In Re Mid-Atlantic Fund, Inc.)
In re Investors Funding Corp., 523 F.Supp. 533, 547 (S.D.N.Y.1980); see Cenco Inc. v. Seidman & Seidman, 686 F.2d 449, 453 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed.2d 145 (1982); IIT v. Cornfeld, 619 F.2d 909, 927 (2d Cir.1980); Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 545 F.Supp. 1314, 1361 (S.D.N.Y.1982); White v. Guarente, 43 N.Y.2d 356, 361-62 , 401 N.Y.S.2d 474, 478 , 372 N.E.2d 315, 319 (1977). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Fischer v. Johns-Manville Corp.
See Dorsey v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd., 655 F. 2d 650 (5th Cir.1981), modified on other grounds, 670 F. 2d 21 (5th Cir.1982), cert. den. 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 177 , 74 L.Ed. 2d 145 (1983), presaging Piper Aircraft Corp. v. Coulter, supra .
cited
Cited "see"
Century Air Freight, Inc. v. American Airlines, Inc.
See Moore Drug Exchange v. Eli Lilly & Co., 662 F.2d 935, 941 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 880 , 103 S.Ct. 176 , 74 L.Ed.2d 144 (1982).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
H. L. Moore Drug Exchange, a Division of Levitt Industries, Inc.
v.
Eli Lilly & Co.
v.
Eli Lilly & Co.
No. 81-2215.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 1982.
Consideration, Motion, Took.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of petitioners to defer consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari denied. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.