green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
9.0 score
“mere delegation by myers of the authority to personally hire crew members to the ship's foreman does not detract from myers' ultimate status as organizer”
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 42 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Hicks v. State
See United States v. Laura, 607 F.2d 52, 58 (3d Cir.1979); but cf. United States v. Hobson, 672 F.2d 825 , 829 n. * (11th Cir.) (court noted, where defendant represented by two attorneys, disqualification of one only partially affects defendant’s right to counsel of choice), reh’g en banc denied, 677 F.2d 117 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982). .
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Gorski v. United States
lthe maker of the overpayments is entitled to the credit or refund
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Humberto Hinojosa and Carlos Lerma
mere delegation by myers of the authority to personally hire crew members to the ship's foreman does not detract from myers' ultimate status as organizer
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. United States
See Gens v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 407 , 615 F.2d 1335, 1339 (1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 209 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982) ("once the government has obtained a single satisfaction, it must abate all 100-percent penalty assessments which have arisen from the payroll tax liability”); see also Schultz v. United States, 918 F.2d 164, 167 (Fed.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 500 U.S. 906 , 111 S.Ct. 1686 , 114 L.Ed.2d 80 (1991); Kelly v. Lethert, 362 F.2d 629, 635 (8th Cir.1966);. .
discussed
Cited "see"
Keohan v. United States
See Gens v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 407 , 615 F.2d 1335, 1339 (Ct.Cl.1980), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 209 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982) (By settling with one party, government affected the rights of other party because 100% penalty under § 6672 is collected only once).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jerry Washington and Herbert Edward James
See United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1030 (5th Cir. Unit B Dec. 28, 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 and 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982). 24 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oscar Smith, Regina Smith and Gary King, Julia Thom
“The test for assessing compelling prejudice is whether it is within the capacity of jurors to follow a court’s limiting instructions and appraise the independent evidence against each defendant solely upon that defendant’s own acts, statements and conduct, and, if possible, severance should not be granted.” United States v. Silien, 825 F.2d 320, 323 (11th Cir.1987) (per curiam); see United States v. Marszalkowski, 669 F.2d 655, 660 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982); see also *1560 United States v. Barnette, 800 F.2d 1558, 1570 (11th Cir.19…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Parsons
See United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1002 (“an allegation of bias sufficient to require disqualification must demonstrate that the bias is personal as distinguished from judicial in nature ... [and] must stem from an extrajudicial source”), cert. denied 457 U.S. 1136, 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 and 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
The United States of America v. Patricia Poole, A/K/A Patricia Hunter
See generally United States v. Marszalkowski, 669 F.2d 655, 662 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Tersea Adela Ashby
See United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 990-997 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) cert. denied 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982) (trial court did not err, when possible jury bias became apparent, in substituting alternate juror after deliberations had begun, instructing jury to begin anew, and receiving individual assurances from each jury that they could in fact begin anew).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Julio Zavala
(2×)
See United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1034 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982), 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. James A. Esposito, United States of America v. Joseph Scutella, Jr., A/K/A Little Joe, United States of America v. Robert v. Pietrzak
See United States v. Hobson, 672 F.2d 825 (11th Cir.1982), reh. denied, 677 F.2d 117 (1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 (1982); United States v. DeLuna, 584 F.Supp. 139, 140 (W.D.Mo.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bernard v. United States
Accord e.g., McCabe v. Commissioner 688 F.2d 102, 105-06 (2nd Cir.) (commuting expenses to and from work are not deductible), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); Pevsner v. Commissioner, 628 F.2d 467, 469 (5th Cir.1980) (commuting expenses and meals during work are not deductible).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of Denver
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Hobson, 672 F.2d 825 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Clark
See State v. Garrett, 627 S.W.2d 635, 639 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); State v. Baker, 636 S.W.2d 902, 909 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1183 , 103 S.Ct. 834 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1027 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gilbert Rivera and Albert Saul Platt
United States v. Hewes, 729 F.2d 1302, 1319 (11th Cir.1984), (citation omitted), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 790 , 83 L.Ed.2d 783 (1985); see United States v. Marszalkowski, 669 F.2d 655 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carmine Persico, Andrew Russo, and Hugh McIntosh
See United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 , 1009 & n. 55 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); United States v. Brooklier, 637 F.2d 620, 624 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 1195 , 75 L.Ed.2d 439 (1983); cf. United States v. Walsh, 700 F.2d 846, 856 (2d Cir.) (allowing cumulative punishments for predicate conduct and RICO violation), cer t. denied, 464 U.S. 825 , 104 S.Ct. 96 , 78 L.Ed.2d 102 (1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Internal Revenue Service v. Blais
See Gens v. United States, 615 F.2d 1335, 1339 , 222 Ct.Cl. 407 (Ct.Cl.1980), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 209 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Padilla-Martinez
See, United States v. Marszalkowski, 669 F.2d 655 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Padilla-Martinez
See, United States v. Marszalkowski, 669 F.2d 655 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bulls v. United States
See, e.g., Henderson v. Lane, 613 F.2d 175 (7th Cir.) (no federal constitutional bar to state court’s substitution of alternate after jury deliberations had begun), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 986 , 100 S.Ct. 2971 , 64 L.Ed.2d 844 (1980); accord United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 992-93 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 & 459 U.S. 906 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 & 103 S.Ct. 208 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 & 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); cf. People v. Collins, 17 Cal.3d 687, 690-94 , 131 Cal.Rptr. 782, 784-87 , 552 P.2d 742, 744-47 (1976) (no bar under California state constitution), ce rt. denied, 429 U.S. 1…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roosevelt Theodore Becton, Jr.
See United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 , 1042-43 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 , 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); United States v. Sperling, 560 F.2d 1050, 1057 (2d Cir. 1977).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Fred W. Sans, Frank A. Weaner, Raymond O. McDonald Jr.
See United States v. Marszalkowski, 669 F.2d 655, 659-60 (11th Cir. 1982) cert. denied sub. nom Brock v. United States, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jonathan Garrett and Christopher Garrett
See United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1017 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 , 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 453 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 991 , 102 S.Ct. 2274 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1287 , 457 U.S. 1137 , 102 S.Ct. 2967 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1355 , 459 U.S. 832 , 103 S.Ct. 72 , 74 L.Ed.2d 71 (1982); United States v. Zicree, 605 F.2d 1381, 1389 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 966 , 100 S.Ct. 1656 , 64 L.Ed.2d 242 (1980); Tillman v. United States, 406 F.2d 930, 93…
discussed
Cited "see"
Billy Sunday Birt v. Charles N. Montgomery, Warden, Georgia State Prison
See United States v. Hobson, 672 F.2d 825, 827 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982) (trial court disqualification of the defendant’s counsel of choice because counsel had prior knowledge of crime held not to violate defendant’s right to counsel of choice); United States v. Kitchin, 592 F.2d 900, 903 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 86 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979) (upholding dismissal of defendant’s counsel for conflict of interest and stating that “a defendant’s right to counsel of choice is not absolute and must yield to the hig…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Martinez
Rodriguez, 719 P.2d at 706 ; see also United States v. Hobson, 672 F.2d 825, 828-29 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
U.S. v. Hinojosa
See also, United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1034 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 , and cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982)("Mere delegation by Myers of the authority to personally hire crew members to the ship's foreman does not detract from Myers' ultimate status as organizer"); United States v. Butler, 885 F.2d 195, 200-01 (4th Cir. 1989)("Nor need the defendant have personal contact with the five persons because organizational authority and responsibility may be delegated"); United States v. Alvarez…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor v. Lucian Hileman
When a challenge to an agency’s construction of its regulations arises, “the ultimate criterion is the administrative interpretation, which becomes of controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., 325 U.S. 410, 414 , 65 S.Ct. 1215, 1217 , 89 L.Ed.2d 1700 (1945); see also Puerto Rico Maritime Shipping Auth. v. Federal Maritime Comm’n, 678 F.2d 327 , 345 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 210 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982) (courts “will accept the [agency’s] interpretation so long as it does not do…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jon R. And Carol J. Pollei, and Harry W. And Renee L. Patrick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
See, e.g., McCabe v. Commissioner, 688 F.2d 102, 107 (2d Cir.) (police officer not entitled to deduct commuting expenses when use of personal auto dictated by choice of residence location rather than need to carry service revolver), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); Fausner v. Commissioner, 413 U.S. 838 , 93 S.Ct. 2820 , 37 L.Ed.2d 996 (1973) (need to carry incidentals of work while commuting doesn’t transform commute costs from personal into business expenses).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edens v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
See, e.g., Wilkinson v. United States, 677 F.2d 998, 1002 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 209 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982) (although disinclined to consider issue not raised below, court considered point anyway and found it meritless); Martin v. United States, 780 F.2d 1147 , 1150 n. 9 (4th Cir.1986) (court refused to address matter not raised below where another issue disposed of the case); Sanderson v. Rice, 777 F.2d 902 , 905 n. 4 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1027 , 106 S.Ct. 1226 , 89 L.Ed.2d 336 (1986) (same); Newman v. Hy-Way Heat Systems, Inc., 789 F.2d 269, 271-…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Edens v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
See, e.g., Wilkinson v. United States, 677 F.2d 998, 1002 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 209 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982) (although disinclined to consider issue not raised below, court considered point anyway and found it merit-less); Martin v. United States, 780 F.2d 1147 , 1150 n. 9 (4th Cir.1986) (court refused to address matter not raised below where another issue disposed of the case); Sanderson v. Rice, 777 F.2d 902, 905 n. 4 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1027 , 106 S.Ct. 1226 , 89 L.Ed.2d 336 (1986) (same); Newman v. Hy-Way Heat Systems, Inc., 789 F.2d 269, 271-…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cox v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.
DISCUSSION We review this case by “applying the ‘clearly erroneous’ test to issues of fact while carefully examining a [district [j]udge’s application of relevant legal standards.” Woods v. Covington County Bank, 537 F.2d 804, 810 (5th Cir.1976) 3 ; see also United States v. Hobson, 672 F.2d 825, 827 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Annette Cox v. American Cast Iron Pipe Company
DISCUSSION 7 We review this case by "applying the 'clearly erroneous' test to issues of fact while carefully examining a [d]istrict [j]udge's application of relevant legal standards." Woods v. Covington County Bank, 537 F.2d 804, 810 (5th Cir.1976) 3 ; see also United States v. Hobson, 672 F.2d 825, 827 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marion Van Horn, Scott Bertelsen, Gary Balough, Dennis Kay, Robert Van Horn, Dennis Cason, Thomas Sikes, John Crosby Bertelsen, Joseph William Campbell, United States of America v. William Joseph Harvey, A/K/A Billy
See, e.g., United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1016 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); United States v. Corbin, 734 F.2d 643, 649 (11th Cir.1984) (proper test is whether charges arise out of "series of acts or transactions" as shown by "substantial identity of facts or participants").
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Michael Grayson, A/K/A White Bear, United States of America v. Charles Moore, A/K/A Uncle Charlie, United States of America v. Michael Lawless, A/K/A Caveman, United States of America v. Charles McKnight A/K/A McNut United States of America v. Donald Robinson, A/K/A Dino, United States of America v. Michael Giordano, A/K/A Bugsy, United States of America v. John Gavis, A/K/A Wacker John
See also United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 , 1009 n. 55 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982) ("The legislative history of RICO demonstrates that Congress intended to permit the imposition of cumulative sentences for both RICO offenses and the underlying predicate offenses. [citations omitted].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Grayson
See also United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 , 1009 n. 55 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982) (“The legislative history of RICO demonstrates that Congress intended to permit the imposition of cumulative sentences for both RICO offenses and the underlying predicate offenses, [cita tions omitted].
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Van Horn
See, e.g., United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1016 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982); United States v. Corbin, 734 F.2d 643, 649 (11th Cir.1984) (proper test is whether charges arise out of “series of acts or transactions” as shown by “substantial identity of facts or participants”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Zeleznik v. United States
See, e.g., Wilkinson v. United States, 677 F.2d 998, 1002 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 209 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Zeleznik v. United States
See, e.g., Wilkinson v. United States, 677 F.2d 998, 1002 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 209 , 74 L.Ed.2d 167 (1982). 19 The Zelezniks contend, however, that the application of this "injury and immediate cause" standard would be unjust in their case because a reasonable investigation begun in 1974 would not have turned up the INS involvement.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert W. Harrington and Paul McLeod
See also United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1043 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), (affirming sentences of 64, 53 and 33 years under Section 848 and other provisions with observation that “proportionality principle might be applicable to an ‘extreme example’ ”), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 , 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed. 166 (1982); United States v. Valenzuela, 646 F.2d 352, 354 (9th Cir.1980), (affirming life sentence under Section 848 with similar observation).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Tom Darby, Constantine Yamanis, Vincent Calise, and Michael Yamanis
As the Court pointed out in Rummel v. Estelle, 445 U.S. 263 , 100 S.Ct. 1133 , 63 L.Ed.2d 382 (1980), “Outside the context of capital punishment, successful challenges to the proportionality of particular sentences have been exceedingly rare.” Id. at 272 , 100 S.Ct. at 1138 ; see also United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1043 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981) (affirming sentences of 64, 53 and 33 years under section 848 and other provisions with observation that *1526 “proportionality principle might be applicable in an ‘extreme example’ ”), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Angelo Pepe and Thomas Miglionico, United States of America v. Albert Joseph Facchiano, Francis Santo, Paul Santo
See also United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 , 459 U.S. 906 , 103 S.Ct. 208 , 74 L.Ed.2d 166 (1982). 10 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Garrett
v.
Missouri
v.
Missouri
No. 81-6851.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 12, 1982.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1) · Federal Claims (1)
Sup. Ct. Mo. Certiorari denied.